trinuclear cluster from the surface oxygen (eliminating more CO
from the complex). It is noted that TGA-DTA (not shown) indeed
indicates similar Os content (7 wt%) for both the Al-MCM-41 and
the MCM-41 supports but the signal of the CO2 evolution (Fig. 2)
is clearly reduced in this acidic catalyst, which suggests the presence
of less carbonyl species available from the Al-MCM-41 support. A
similar surface species of a tri-Os carbonyl cluster with a bidentate
alkenes in liquid phase. The precise nature of the surface chiral
species is yet to be disclosed.
We are grateful to D. Law for help with SCIENTA ESCA300
X-ray photoelectron spectrometry at the RUSTI Laboratory
(UK), A. Munday for elemental analysis and Drs G. Blond, C.-M.
Yang and E. Toukoniitty for helpful discussions. Further
characterisations of the anchored Os samples can be found in
the Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI{).
oxygen donor from
a silica surface has been previously
suggested.13 On the other hand, after calcination of the as-
synthesised samples at 220 uC, the numbers of CO stretching
bands in both MCM-41/Al-MCM-41 samples have been
substantially decreased as compared to the free Os3(CO)12
cluster. Three principal FTIR CO-stretching vibrations are
now observed at 2130, 2040 and 2000 cm21, in agreement with
the previous observations that heat treatment of silica anchored
(m–H)Os3(CO)10(m–OSi–) species can produce mononuclear sur-
face species Os(CO)x (x 5 2 or 3) with C2v or C3v symmetry
through the cluster degradation.9,13
Vale´rie Caps,{ Ioannis Paraskevas and Shik Chi Tsang*
The Surface and Catalysis Research Centre, School of Chemistry,
University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, UK RG6 6AD.
E-mail: s.c.e.tsang@reading.ac.uk; Fax: +44 118 931 6632;
Tel: +44 118 931 6346
Notes and references
1 H. C. Kolb, M. S. VanNieuwenhze and K. B. Sharpless, Chem. Rev.,
1994, 94, 2483; L. Ahrgren and L. Sutin, Org. Process Res. Dev., 1997, 1,
425.
From the above characterisation, it may not be possible to work
out the precise origin of the exciting enantioselectivity observed in
the as-synthesised mesoporous samples. However, it is apparently
clear that the mononuclear Os species anchored on the MCM-41
surface give a racemic mixture with no enantioselectivity in trans-
stilbene oxidation. On the other hand, the trinuclear Os species
anchored onto MCM-41, and in particular onto Al-MCM-41
(which accommodates more trinuclear Os species), give a very high
enantioselectivity for the same reaction. It has recently been
reported that placing chiral catalysts in confined porous structures,
such as mesoporous silicates, could significantly boost the ee
values.15 Thus, it is thought that our impressive ee in the case of
Al-MCM-41 is a result of the introduction of surface Al sites into
MCM-41 for immobilisation of more trinuclear species, hence
generating a more sterically crowded environment at higher
coverage. Perhaps the most intriguing difference between our
results and the literature is that no chiral ligand/modifier or
oxidant is used in our case. Thus, we believe that upon
immobilisation on the MCM-41 or related surfaces, a favourable
chiral orientation of the triosmium complex precursor must have
taken place, resulting in a new surface chiral catalytic species.
In summary, we have made an unprecedented observation that
heterogenisation of Os3(CO)12 on the internal surface of Al-MCM-
41 using simple chemical vapour deposition gives a superior
enantioselectivity in the dihydroxylation of trans-stilbene without
adding a chiral modifier. The present enantiomeric excess observed
reaches 90%, rendering these materials potential heterogeneous
catalysts akin to enzymes for the asymmetric dihydroxylation of
2 D. E. De Vos, B. F. Sels and P. A. Jacobs, Adv. Catal., 2002, 46, 1;
A. Severeyns, D. E. De Vos and P. A. Jacobs, Top. Catal., 2002, 19, 125.
3 D. Pini, A. Petri, A. Nardi, C. Rosini and P. Salvadori, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1991, 32, 5175; P. Salvatori, D. Pini and A. Petri, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1997, 119, 6929; C. Bolm and A. Gerlach, Eur. J. Org. Chem.,
1998, 21.
4 C. Bolm, A. Maischak and A. Gerlach, Chem. Commun., 1997, 2353.
5 I. Motorina and C. M. Crudden, Org. Lett., 2001, 3, 2325.
6 W. A. Herrmann, R. M. Kratzer, J. Blu¨mel, H. B. Friedrich,
R. W. Fischer, D. C. Apperley, J. Mink and O. Berkesi, J. Mol.
Catal. A: Chem., 1997, 120, 197.
7 S. Kobayashi, T. Ishida and R. Akiyama, Org. Lett., 2001, 3, 2649.
8 B. M. Choudary, N. S. Chowdari, M. L. Kantam and K. V. Raghavan,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 9220; B. M. Choudary, N. S. Chowdari,
K. Jyothi and M. L. Kantam, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 5341.
9 V. Caps, I. Paraskevas and S. C. Tsang, Appl. Catal., A, 2003, 252, 37.
10 A. Matsumoto, H. Chen, K. Tsutsumi, M. Gru¨n and K. Unger,
Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 1999, 32, 55.
11 H.-L. Kwong, C. Sorato, Y. Ogino, H. Chen and K. B. Sharpless,
Tetrahedron Lett., 1990, 31, 2999.
12 C. E. Song, Chem. Commun., 2004, 1033–1043.
13 R. Psaro, C. Dossi, A. Fiso and R. Ugo, Res. Chem. Intermed., 1991, 15,
31; J. Evans, Spectrochim. Acta, 1987, 43, 1511.
14 V. Caps and S. C. Tsang, Appl. Catal., A, 2003, 248, 19.
15 B. F. G. Johnson, S. A. Raynor, D. S. Shephard, T. Mashmeyer,
J. M. Thomas, G. Sankar, S. Bromley, R. Oldroyd, L. Gladdenc and
M. D. Mantlec, Chem. Commun., 1999, 1167; J. M. Thomas,
T. Maschmeyer, B. F. G. Johnson and D. S. Shephard, J. Mol.
Catal. A: Chem., 1999, 141, 139; S. A. Raynor, J. M. Thomas, R. Raja,
B. F. G. Johnson, R. G. Bell and M. D. Mantlec, Chem. Commun.,
2000, 1925; R. Raja, J. M. Thomas, M. D. Jones, B. F. G. Johnson and
D. E. W. Vaughan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 14982; M. D. Jones,
R. Raja, J. M. Thomas, B. F. G. Johnson, D. W. Lewis, J. Rouzaud
and K. D. M. Harris, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 4326.
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2005
Chem. Commun., 2005, 1781–1783 | 1783