aReagents and conditions: o-Tol-Br (0.5 mmol), n-hexylamine (1.0 mmol), 1
(0.5 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol%), ligand (monodentate 10 mol%, bidentate 5
mol%), µ-wave irradiation (130 °C, 20 min), 1,4-dioxane (2 mL).
aDetermined by GC-MS using a standard curve of 2a. bIsolated yield.
8
0
Changing the ligand to Sphos slightly increased the yield to
35% (Table 1, entry 2).8 When the ligand was changed to tri-tert-
butylphosphonium tetrafluoroborate an almost quantitative yield
(95% from GC-MS and 82% isolated) was obtained (Table 1,
entry 3). Changing to the bidentate ligands dppf, CataXium A or
Xantphos gave 2a in 44%, 26% and 45% yield, respectively
(Table 1, entries 4-6).
aReagents and conditions: ArBr (0.5 mmol), n-hexylamine (1.0 mmol), 1 (0.5
mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol%), P(t-Bu)3HBF4 (10 mol-%), µ-wave irradiation
(130 °C, 20 min), 1,4-dioxane (2 mL). bIsolated yield.
Next, the effect of the amine was evaluated (Table 3). Primary
amines generally provided the corresponding product in higher
yield than secondary amines or aniline. 2-Methylpropan-1-amine
provided amide 2i in 60% yield, whereas when benzylamine was
used, a yield of 68% (2j) was obtained (Table 3, entries 1-2). The
secondary amines 4-phenylpiperidine and morpholine gave
amides 2k and 2l in 52% and 65% yield, respectively (Table 3,
entries 3-4). Changing the amine to aniline provided the
corresponding amide 2m in 42% yield (Table 3, entry 5). Lastly,
when diisobutylamine was used no amide 2n could be identified
in the crude mixture (Table 3, entry 6). The flexible and bulky
nature of this amine may cause the reaction to be hampered.
Using the optimized reaction conditions for the palladium-
catalyzed carbonylation we sought to evaluate the scope and
limitations of the developed method. Initially the impact of the
aryl bromide was evaluated (Table 2). In general, the electronic
properties had little effect on the yield of the products. Aryl
bromides containing electron-withdrawing or donating groups
gave the corresponding amides (2a-2f) in 70-82% isolated yield
(Table 2, entries 1-6). Functional groups such as methoxy (2b
and 2e) or cyano (2d) did not significantly change the yield. One
exception was the 2-phenyl substituted product 2f (Table 2, entry
7). In this case the steric bulk of the phenyl group in close
vicinity to the bromide most likely causes the decreased yield
(52%). When 1-bromo-4-nitrobenzene was used no amide 2h
was formed (Table 2, entry 8). The iron-containing 1 may cause a
reduction of the nitro functional group to an amine which could
compete with n-hexylamine in the carbonylative reaction.
Table 3. Influence of the amine in the carbonylative reaction.
Entry
1
Producta
Yield (%)b
60
Table 2. Influence of the aryl bromide in the µ-wave assisted
carbonylative reaction.
2
3
68
52
Entry
1
Producta
Yield (%)b
82
2
3
74
71
4
5
65
42
4
72
6
0
aReagents and conditions: p-Tol-Br (0.5 mmol), amine (1.0 mmol), 1 (0.5
mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol%), P(t-Bu)3HBF4 (10 mol%), µ-wave irradiation
(130 °C, 20 min), 1,4-dioxane (2 mL). bIsolated yield.
5
6
7
74
70
52
Conclusion
In conclusion a palladium-catalyzed method was developed
for the carbonylation of aryl bromides into amides using µ-wave
irradiation at 130 °C for 30 min. After optimization of the
reaction condition it was shown that tri-tert-butylphosphonium
tetrafluoroborate (P(t-Bu)3HBF4) was a superior ligand that
provided the desired products in up to 82% isolated yield.