Table 1 Preparation of oxetes 3a–c and esters 4a–e (yields are unoptimized)
from aldehydes 1a–e
–O–CHHb–Ph), 3.89 (1 H, part A of ABX3 system, JAB 9.6, JAX 7.1,
O–CHaH–Me), 3.86 (1 H, part B of ABX3 system, JAB 9.6, JAX 7.0,
O–CHHb–Me), 3.66 (1 H, m, CH–OBn), 1.82 (1 H, part A of ABXY system,
JAB 14.5, JAX 8.7, JAY 3.7, O–CH–CHaH–CH–O), 1.72 (1 H, part B of
ABXY system, JAB 14.5, JAX 7.1, JAY 3.3, O–CH–CHHb–CH–O),
1.88–1.46 (6 H, m), 1.37–1.18 (14 H, m), 0.87 (3 H, t, J 7.0, –Me), 0.85 (3
H, br t, O–CH2–Me); dc (50.3 MHz, CDCl3) 138.3 (s), 138.0 (s), 128.5 (d,
2C), 128.0 (d, 2C), 127.9 (d), 111.8 (d), 77.0 (d), 77.1 (t), 68.7 (t), 68.6 (d),
39.8 (t), 33.4 (t), 32.0 (t), 29.8 (t), 29.7 (t, 2C), 29.6 (t, 2C), 29.4 (t), 25.4 (t),
22.8 (t), 14.2 (q, 2C).
§ 1H and 13C NMR data of 3b,c are similar to those described for 3a.
¶ Oxete 3c was, for example, kept over 2 months in a NMR tube (1H
concentration). We first imagine that the relative stability of Lewis acid-free
3a could result from an intramolecular p-stacking (between the double bond
and the aromatic ring), but both the formation of 3b and semiempirical
(AM1) calculations were in disagreement with such an explanation.
(E)-Ester
Entry Aldehyde
Lewis acid
Oxete (d.r.)
(yield)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1a
1a
1b
1c
1d
1d
1e
1e
MgBr2–OEt2
BF3–OEt2
MgBr2–OEt2
MgBr2–OEt2
BF3–OEt2
MgBr2–OEt2
BF3–OEt2
MgBr2–OEt2
3a (4:1)
—
3b (9:1)
3c (9:1)
—
—
—
—
4a (88%)
4a (70%)
4b (67%)
4c (75%)
4d (60%)
4d (71%)
4e (56%)
4e (73%)
therefore B is not possible12 and hence the conrotatory ring
opening takes place.
1 H. Vieregge, H. J. T. Bos and J. F. Arens, Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas,
1959, 78, 664; see also H. Vieregge and J. F. Arens, Recl. Trav. Chim.
Pays-Bays, 1959, 78, 921.
2 H. Vieregge, H. M. Schmidt, J. Renema, H. J. T. Bos and J. F. Arens,
Recl. Trav. Chim Pays-Bas, 1966, 85, 929.
Finally, although 3a–c are stable in CDCl3 solution at
220 °C,¶ their life-time at room temperature does not exceed 1
or 2 h and is a few seconds in solution at 230 °C in the presence
of BF3–Et2O (in all three cases, ring opening leads to esters
4a–c). This last observation gives further support for the
structure of 3a–c and to our hypothesis of the rigidity of chelate
B.
In conclusion, we have provided the first evidence of a [2 +
2] mechanism for the studied reaction. We think that the
isolation of oxetes 3a–c at room temperature rests upon the
formation of stable chelates B which prevents the conrotatory
ring opening step of the reaction. Since the formation of 3a–c
occurs with good diasteroselectivity, studies are currently
underway to use these as intermediates in synthesis.
We are grateful to Dr François Volatron (CNRS-Orsay) for
useful discussions, and to Mrs Roselyne Rosas and Dr Robert
Faure (Universite´ d’Aix-Marseille) for NMR experiments.
3 W. J. Middleton, J. Org. Chem., 1965, 30, 1307.
4 J. Pornet, A. Rayadh and L. Miginiac, Tetrahedron Lett., 1986, 27,
5479; J. Pornet, A. Rayadh and L. Miginiac, Tetrahedron Lett., 1988,
29, 3065; D. Zakarya, A. Rayadh, M. Samih and T. Lakhlifi,
Tetrahedron Lett., 1994, 35, 405; D. Zakarya, A. Rayadh, M. Samih and
T. Lakhlifi, Tetrahedron Lett., 1994, 35, 2345; C. J. Kowalski and S.
Sakdarat, J. Org. Chem., 1990, 55, 1977.
5 D. Crich and J. Z. Crich, Tetrahedron Lett., 1994, 35, 2469.
6 A trimethylgermyloxete resulting from the Lewis acid catalyzed
cyclization of the O-(trimethylgermyl) derivative of 4-ethoxy-1,1,1-tri-
fluoro-2-(trifluoromethyl)but-3-yn-2-ol has been described: G. S.
Zaitseva, L. I. Livantsova, N. A. Orlova, Yu. L. Baukov and I. F.
Lutsenko, Zh. Obshch. Khim., 1982, 52, 2076.
7 L. E. Friedrich and G. B. Schuster, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1969, 91, 7204;
L. E. Friedrich and G. B. Schuster, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1971, 93, 4603;
L. E. Friedrich and J. D. Bower, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1973, 95, 6869; Y.
Kobayashi, Y.Hanzawa, W. Miyashita, J. Kashiwagi, T. Nakano and I.
Kumadaki, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1979, 101, 6445.
Notes and References
8 Y. I. Baukov, G. S. Zaisteva, L. I. Livanstova, R. A. Bekker and L. A.
Savost’yanova, Zh. Obshch. Khim., 1981, 51, 1304.
† E-mail: jean-marc.pons@reso.u-3mrs.fr
‡ The structure of 3a lies upon extensive 2D homo- and hetero-nuclear 1H
NMR experiments at 400 MHz. Experimental procedure: a solution of 1a
(0.35 mmol; 111 mg) in CH2Cl2 (1 cm3) was added to a suspension of
MgBr2–OEt2 (1.05 mmol; 270 mg) in CH2Cl2 (3 cm3) at 260 °C under
argon. After 15 min, a solution of 2 (0.70 mmol; 49 mg) in CH2Cl2 (2 cm3)
at room temp. was added dropwise to the suspension at 260 °C. TLC
monitoring showed the reaction to be completed (no starting material left)
after 15 min. The reaction mixture was diluted in light petroleum (10 cm3)
and hydrolyzed with ice–water (2 cm3). Filtration and concentration in
vacuo gave 126 mg of crude product; 1H NMR (400 MHz) was used to
establish the presence of 3a as a 4:1 mixture of the two diastereomers. An
increase in the temperature of the reaction mixture, up to 230 °C, prior to
the hydrolysis led to unsaturated ester 4a (88%). Rf (light petroleum–Et2O
= 7:3) 1a:0.5; 3a:0.25; 4a:0.75.
9 D. C. England and C. G. Krespan, J. Org. Chem., 1970, 35, 3312.
10 A. Pommier, J.-M. Pons, P. J. Kocienski and L. Wong, Synthesis, 1994,
1294; A. Pommier, J.-M. Pons and P. J. Kocienski, J. Org. Chem., 1995,
60, 7334; J.-M. Pons, M. Oblin, A. Pommier, M. Rajzmann and D.
Liotard, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 3333; B. W. Dymock, P. J.
Kocienski and J.-M. Pons, Chem. Commun., 1996, 1053.
11 For X-ray structure and NMR evidence of chelates similar to A, see
G. E. Keck and S. Castellino, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1986, 108, 3847
(NMR); M. T. Reetz, K. Harmsand and W. Reif, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1988, 29, 5881 (X-ray).
12 It is well known that TBDMS ethers do not give chelates but rather 2:1
complexes with bidentate Lewis acids. G. E. Keck and S. Castellino,
Tetrahedron Lett., 1987, 28, 281. For other examples, see M. Santelli
and J.-M. Pons, in Lewis Acids and Selectivity in Organic Synthesis,
CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1996, ch. 1.
3a: major isomer: dH (400 MHz, CDCl3) 7.35–7.25 (5 H, m, PhH), 5.12
(1 H, d, J 7.9, NCH), 4.60 (1 H, m, CH–O–), 4.59 (1 H, part A of AB system,
JAB 11.9, –O–CHaH–Ph), 4.52 (1 H, part B of AB system, JAB 11.9,
Received in Liverpool, UK, 5th May 1998; 8/03395A
1620
Chem. Commun., 1998