3
The enolation of substrate 2a followed by oxidative
dehydrogenation by molecular iodine could reduce the total steps
and increase the overall yield. We screened the different set of
reaction conditions to aromatize the substrate 2a (Table 1). To
avoid the expensive catalyst and harsh condition, we tried
different types of readily available salts, but these salts did not
afford the desired product 4a. However product 3a was isolated
with 47% by the combined treatment of NaBr and iodine in
DMSO at 100 ºC (Table 1, entry d). The combination of LiBr (1
equiv.) and molecular iodine (25 mol%) in DMSO at 80 ºC lead
to increase the yield of clausine E 4a (Table 1, entry e, 87%).
Further increase the amount of molecular iodine did not
significantly affect the reaction yield. In the next step, o-
methlyation was carried out by diazomethane in methanol to
afford mukonine (5a) in 98% yield.20 Treatment of 5a with 10%
NaOH in methanol accomplished the mukoeic acid (6) with
excellent yield. However, under similar optimal condition, we
have successfully achieved isomer 5b from 2b.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated a convenient, general
and flexible synthesis for the diverse structure of carbazole
alkaloids with good to excellent overall yields. In the present
approach, construction of a suitably substituted basic carbazole
framework in just 4-5 steps by modifying the aromatization
process is remarkable. The present method is expedient and
elegant furnishes an alternative method to aromatic process.
Syntheses of these alkaloids have been accomplished without
involving any discrete protection-deprotection steps. Further
studies on the synthesis of other carbazole alkaloids and their
analogues with additional biological studies are currently in
progress and will be reported in due course.
Acknowledgments
VTH is thankful to CSIR, New Delhi, India, for the award of a
senior research fellowship and MSN is thankful to UGC, New
Delhi, India, for the award of a senior research fellowship. We
thanks Dr, Santosh Misal, Indiana University Bloomington,
Indiana, USA for helpful discussion.
To our delight, 5a-b on our hand, we turn our synthesis to
diverse structure of carbazoles from a single precursor. The
substrates 5a-b were reduced to their corresponding alcohols 7a-
b
by lithium aluminium hydride in THF under reflux
References and notes
condition.21a Furthermore, under oxidation by activated MnO2 in
acetone, 7a-b gets converted to murrayanine 8a (98%) and
mukolidine 8b (97%).21b
1.
(a) Schmidt, A. W.; Reddy, K. R.; Knölker, H. -J. Chem. Rev.
2012, 112, 3193. (b) Knölker, H. -J.; Reddy, K. R. Chem. Rev.
2002, 102, 4303. (c) Roy, J.; Jana, A. K.; Mal, D. Tetrahedron
2012, 68, 6099.
Encouraged by the findings discussed above, we have drawn
the total synthesis of 1, 6- dioxygenated carbazole such as
clausenol (14). In this case, we smoothly achieved substrate 9 by
the condensation of 4-methoxyphenylhydrazine and 4-methyl
cyclohexanone under reflux condition. When substrate 9 was
employed to periodic acid in methanol for 6 h at -20 ºC, the oxo-
product 10 was isolated with low yield (16%). However, the
reaction was sluggish at 0 ºC and room temperature. Therefore,
we changed our strategy and started with appropriate 1-
oxotetrahydrocarbazole 12. In this case, 4-bromophenylhydrazine
and 4-methylcyclohexanone was allowed to undergo in Fischer-
Borsche method to give tetrahydrocarbazole 11. The resulting
compound 11 was treated with periodic acid in methanol, the
corresponding oxo-product 12 was accomplished with 69% yield.
A mixture of molecular iodine and lithium bromide was
subjected to 12 in dimethyl sulfoxide at 80 ºC to afforded
aromatic product 13 in 75% yield. In the next step, bromo group
of substrate 13 was displaced by methoxy group using
CuI/MeONa22 in DMF at 120 ºC, the clausenol 14 obtained in
69% yield. Finally, Phenol 14 on methylation by diazomethane in
presence of methanol furnished clausenine (15). The
spectroscopic data of all synthesized natural products are in
agreement with that reported in the literature.23
2.
3.
Schammel, A. W.; Boal, B. W.; Zu, L.; Mesganaw, T.; Garg, N.
K. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 4687.
(a) Jiricek, J.; Blechert, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 3534. (b)
Zu, L.; Boal, B. W.; Garg, N. K. J.Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133,
8877. (c) Dhanabal, T.; Sangeetha, R.; Mohan, P. S. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2005, 46, 4509.
4.
(a) Knölker, H. -J.; Reddy, K. R. Chemistry and Biology of
Carbazole Alkaloids, In The Alkaloids Chemistry and Biology,
Vol. 65, Cordell, G. A., Ed.; Academic Press: Amsterdam, 2008.
(b) Li, W. S.; McChesney, J. D.; El- Feraly, F. S. Phytochemistry
1991, 30, 343. (c) Bringmann, G.; Ledermann, A .; Holenz, J.;
Kao, M. -T.; Busse, U.; Wu, H. G.; François, G. Planta Med.
1998, 64, 54. (d) Wu, T. -S.; Huang, S. -C.; Wu, P. -L.; Teng, C.
-M. Phytochemistry 1996, 43, 133.
(a) Kumar,V. P.; Grunar, K. K.; Kataevo, O.; Knölker, H. -J.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 11073. (b) Borger, C.; Schmidt,
A. W.; Knölker, H. -J. Org. Bio. Chem. 2014, 12, 3831. (c)
Hesse, R.; Jager, A.; Schmidt, A. W.; Knölker, H. -J. Org. Bio.
Chem. 2014, 12, 3866. (d) Knölker, H. -J.; Bauermeister, M. J.
Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1990, 664. (e) Börger, C.; Krahl, M.
P.; Gruner, M.; Kataeva, O.; Knölker, H. -J. Org. Biomol. Chem.
2012, 10, 5189.
5.
6.
7.
Fiebig, M.; Pezzuto, J. M.; Soejarto, D. D.; Kinghorn, A. D.
Phytochemistry 1985, 24, 3041.
Chakraborty, D. P.; Barman, B. K.; Bose, P. K. Tetrahedron
1965, 21, 681.