J . Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 4931-4934
4931
Notes
2-Ch lor oa llyl Ca tion . Str u ctu r e, F T-IR
Sp ectr a , a n d Ma tr ix Isola tion
Davor Ki]emet,† Zlatko Mihalic´,*,† Igor Novak,‡ and
Hrvoj Vancˇik*,†
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and
Mathematics, University of Zagreb, Strossmayerov trg 14,
10000 Zagreb, Croatia, and Department of Chemistry,
National University of Singapore, Singapore 119260
Received August 11, 1997
F igu r e 1. MP2(fc)/6-311G(d,p) optimized geometries and
relative energies (including ZPVE correction) of cations 1a and
1b and transition structure for their interconversion.
Although a series of chloro-substituted allyl cations
were already characterized by NMR and IR spectra,1 the
problem of the structure of the 2-chloroallyl cation (1)
still remained an open question.2 It is known that allyl
cations are sensitive to the electron donating capabilities
of their substituents. Chlorine bound to the terminal
C-atom of the allyl group has a stabilizing effect that can
be ascribed to the back-donation of n-electrons. This effect
is manifested in the lowering of the rotational barrier
observed for the cis-trans isomerization of 1-chloroallyl
cations.1a Moreover, the extent of the stabilization by a
terminal chlorine is almost the same as by a terminal
methyl group.
However, an electron donating substituent bound to
the central carbon atom of the allyl group has no
stabilizing effect by π-conjugation. It was found3 that the
solvolysis rate of 2-chloro- and 2-bromoallyl esters is
much lower than that of the parent allyl tosylate. This
inter alia may be a consequence of the π-orbital non-
interaction between the halogen n-electrons and the allyl
cation LUMO. The orbital that describes halogen lone
pair electrons lies in the bisecting nodal plane of the
LUMO of the allyl cation. From such a point of view, it
may be expected that the preferred effect of chlorine in
1 is bridging rather than a back-donation of n-electrons,
and the Cs structure 1a seemed to be more favorable.
such a structure.2 The more symmetric C2v structure 1b
has not been taken into account in an explanation of
these spectral data. However, in spite of the lack of
π-interaction between the allyl group and the chlorine
atom, the structure 1b could be considered to be at least
as stable as isomer 1a . Stability of 1b may originate from
a perfect allyl group π-electron delocalization. Addition-
ally, the destabilizing sterical and strain effects are
absent in this structure.
In this work, we represent a reinvestigation of the
structure of 1 by ab initio calculations on the MP2 and
DFT level of theory. The results of the calculations are
supplemented with the experimental approach to the
isolation and FT-IR characterizations of the ion.
Resu lts a n d Discu ssion
Resu lts of Ca lcu la tion s. The energies of cations 1a
and 1b and the transition structure for their intercon-
version were calculated at the MP2(fc)/6-311G(d,p) level
of theory (Figure 1). The C2v structure 1b is 7.5 kcal/mol
(ZPVE-corrected value) more stable than the chlorine-
bridged isomer 1a . The activation energy for the isomer-
ization of 1a to 1b is calculated to be 14.7 kcal/mol. At
the DFT level (B3LYP/6-311G(d,p)), the stability relation
between 1a and 1b is not much different than at the MP2
level. Isomer 1b (C2v) is 10.1 kcal/mol (ZPVE-corrected
value) more stable than 1a . Theoretically, both of the
carbocations are isolable. Noninteraction of the chlorine
n-electrons in 1b could be demonstrated by unchanged
values of the C-Cl bond distance. It is less shortened
(1.703 Å, compared to 1.640 Å in 1-chloroallyl cation,
1.747 Å in 2-chloropropene, or 1.735 Å in 2,3-dichloro-
propene (2), all at MP2(fc)/6-311G(d,p)) than could be
expected for the structures with more significant chlorine
interaction. A decrease in the C-Cl bond length by
0.0674a and 0.0584b Å in going from a neutral chloride to
an R-chlorocarbocation has been observed by X-ray dif-
This structure could also be considered as a kind of
allene chloronium ion. Previously published 1H NMR
spectra of 1 in a SbF5/SO2 solution were explained by
† University of Zagreb.
‡ National University of Singapore.
(1) (a) Vancˇik, H.; Mihalic´, Z.; Ki]emet, D. Croat. Chem. Acta 1996,
69, 1511. (b) West, R.; Kwitowski, P. T. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88,
5280. Deno, N. C.; Holland, G. W. J .; Schulze, T. J . Org. Chem. 1967,
32, 1496. Deno, N. C. In Carbonium Ions; Olah, G. A., Schleyer, P. v.
R., Eds.; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1970; Vol. 2, pp 783-806.
(2) Bollinger, J . M.; Brinich, J . M.; Olah, G. A. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1970, 92, 4025.
(4) (a) Laube, T.; Bannwart, E.; Hollenstein, S. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1993, 115, 1731. (b) Chen, G. S.; Glaser, R.; Barnes, C. L. J . Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1993, 1530. (c) Review: Weinhold, F.; Carpenter,
J . L. In The Structure of Small Molecules and Ions; Naaman, R., Vager,
Z., Eds.; Plenum: New York, 1988; p 227. (d) Bader, R. F. W. Atoms
in Molecules-A Quantum Theory; Clarendon Press: Oxford, 1990.
(3) Bentley, T. W.; Norman, S. J .; Kemmer, R.; Christl, M. Liebigs
Ann. 1995, 599.
10.1021/jo971481g CCC: $18.00 © 1999 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 06/06/1999