presence of 5% Pd(PPh3)4 to afford iminodiacetic acid 6 in
92% yield. Iminodiacetic acid 6 was initially treated with
1.0 equiv of DCC at room temperature to generate anhydride
3. In a separate sequence, amino azide 4 was acylated with
the readily available bis-protected glutamate 71b in methylene
chloride with 1.1 equiv of DCC and a catalytic amount of
DMAP for 12 h at 25 °C to provide azide 8 in 94% yield
(cf. 47% yield in THF). Reaction of 8 with triphenylphos-
phine2,5 in THF and H2O gave the desired primary amine 9
in 98% yield. Addition of amine 9 to the preformed
anhydride 3 and stirring for an additional 12 h at 25 °C
smoothly provided glutamate 10 (Scheme 1).
Hu¨nig’s base at 25 °C in methylene chloride. Similar reaction
in THF only afforded 12 in 58% yield. Reaction of 2′-alloc
paclitaxel 12 with carboxylic acid 10 in the presence of DCC
and a catalytic amount of DMAP in methylene chloride for
12 h at 25 °C provided Y-shaped intermediate 13 in 93%
yield after column chromatography (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2
Scheme 1
Initially, we tried to reduce azide 13 to amine 15 using
the triphenylphosphine method, but we could not isolate the
pure compound. It was found that the phosphine imine
intermediate formed satisfactorily, but hydrolysis was very
slow and amine 14 was consumed at a rate competitive with
its formation over the course of 48 h. Products arising from
transamination and ester hydrolysis were observed. At this
stage, a variety of azide reduction methods7-10 (NaHTe,
LiMe2NBH3, tin hydrides, and TMS-Cl/NaI) were surveyed
with essentially no success. To preserve our supply of 13,
we returned to azide 8 as a model compound. The TMSCl/
NaI method was ineffective, and HSCH2CH2CH2SH/Et3N/
MeOH underwent reaction with the ester functionality. The
first encouraging reaction utilized SnCl2/PhSH/Et3N,11 which
quickly and completely consumed the starting material and
gave product 9 without affecting the ester group (Scheme
1).
Application of this method also rapidly reduced compound
10 to amine 14 but revealed the problem of effective product
isolation. The recommended protocol11 employs a strongly
basic workup procedure (2 N NaOH) to destroy the tin
complex, but is not applicable to our substrates because of
the labile ester functionality. The workup procedure was
modified, utilizing an exchange method to transfer the tin
from nitrogen to the oxygen of the methanol solvent.9a After
the reaction of compound 10 with SnCl2/PhSH/Et3N in
acetonitrile, a weakly basic workup (saturated NaHCO3
solution) served to neutralize the ammonium salt. The
We needed to protect the C-2′ position of paclitaxel 11 to
selectively functionalize the C-7 site.6 Since we were
employing allyl esters on the glutamate moiety, we elected
to also protect the C-2′ position as an allyloxycarbonate to
provide for eventual simultaneous deblocking of all three
centers. 2′-Alloc paclitaxel 12 was obtained in 98% yield
from reaction of paclitaxel 11 with allyl chloroformate and
(3) All new compounds have been characterized by proton NMR, carbon
NMR, exact mass, and/or elemental analysis.
(4) Dessolin, M.; Guillerez, M.-G.; Thieriet, N.; Guibe, F.; Loffet, A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 5741.
(7) Alvarez, S. G.; Fisher, G. B.; Singaram, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995,
36, 2567.
(8) Suzuki, H.; Kawaguchi, T.; Takaoka, K. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1986,
59, 665.
(5) Frisch, B.; Boeckler, C.; Schuber, F. Bioconjugate Chem. 1996, 7,
180. (b) Wentworth, P., Jr.; Vandersteen, A. M.; Janda, K. D. Chem.
Commun. 1997, 759. (c) Urpi, F.; Vilarrasa, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27,
4623. (d) Schoetzau, T.; Holletz, T.; Cech, D. Chem. Commun. 1996, 387.
(6) Greenwald, R. B.; Gilbert, C. W.; Pendri, A.; Conover, C. D.; Xia,
J.; Martinez, A. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 424.
(9) Hays, D. S.; Fu, G. C. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 2796. (b) Samano,
M. C.; Robins, M. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 6293.
(10) Kamal, A.; Rao, N. V.; Laxman, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38,
6945.
(11) Bartra, M.; Romea, P.; Urpi, F.; Vilarrasa, J. Tetrahedron 1990,
46, 587.
180
Org. Lett., Vol. 1, No. 2, 1999