10.1002/chem.201900204
Chemistry - A European Journal
FULL PAPER
compound crystallized from the brown solution. The powder was filtered
and dissolved in 500 mL 4:1 ethanol–water. After adding active carbon,
the solution was heated to reflux for 10 minutes. The green solution was
neutralized with ammonia giving a yellow precipitate which was filtered,
washed and dried. Yield 5.25 g (25%). Selected IR (KBr): 3067 (w), 2956
(w), 1 602(w), 1471 (s), 1346 (s), 1405(m), 1306 (m), 1238 (m), 923 (m),
854 (m), 751 (s), 563 (m) cm-1. ESI-MS: m/z = 289 [C18H16N4+H]+.
were performed using Vario Micro Cube. Thermogravimetric analyses
(TGA) were performed in a flow of nitrogen at a heating rate of 5 °C min-1
using a NETZSCH TG 209 F3. Infrared spectra of compounds were
obtained by transmission through KBr pellets containing ca. 0.5% of the
compound using a PE Spectrum FTIR spectrometer (400–4000 cm-1).
Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) intensities were measured at 296 K
using a Rigaku D/max-IIIA diffractometer (Cu Kα). The crystalline powder
sample was prepared by crushing the crystals, and scans of 5–60° were
conducted at a rate of 5° min-1. The calculated diffraction patterns of the
compounds were generated using the Mercury 3.0 software. A THERMO
Finnigan LCQ Advantage Max ion trap mass spectrometer was used to
collect ESI-MS spectra. A Perkin-Elmer Lambda 35 spectrometer was
used to measure the UV-Vis absorption spectra of ligands and
compounds. The emission luminescence and lifetime properties were
recorded with an Edinburgh FLS 920 fluorescence spectrometer.
1,2-di(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethane (L’). Benzene-1,2-diamine
(15.14 g, 140 mmol) and succinic acid (8.26 g, 70 mmol) were dissolved
in 100 ml 4 M hydrochloric acid. The solution was heated to reflux for 24
hours to a faint yellow color. After cooling, it was neutralized with
ammonia and the yellow precipitate was filtered. The powder was
recrystallized in 300 mL 4 : 1 ethanol–water. After cooling, the white
precipitate was filtered, washed and dried. The yield of L’ was 11.25 g
(61%). Selected IR (KBr): 2744 (s), 1625 (w), 1541 (m), 1435 (s), 1319
(w), 1268 (m), 1221 (m), 1032 (m), 911 (m), 870 (m), 740 (s) cm-1. 1H
NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 7.85 (m, 4H, ArH), 7.65 (m, 4H, ArH) and
3.82 (s, 4H, CH2). ESI-MS: m/z = 263 [C18H14N4+H]+.
X-ray Crystallography. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction data for L1, L2
and L’ and 1‒6 were collected on a Rigaku R-AXIS SPIDER IP
diffractometer employing graphite-monochromated Cu-Kα radiation (λ =
1.54184 Å) using the θ-ω scan technique at 150 K. Their structures were
solved by direct methods using ShelXS and refined using full matrix
Synthesis of metal compounds (1-3). A mixture of ZnCl2 (1.0 mmol,
0.14 g), L1 (1.0 mmol, 0.28 g) / L2 (1 mmol, 0.31 g) / L’ (1 mmol, 0.26 g)
and methanol (15 mL) was sealed in a 25 mL Teflon-lined steel autoclave
and heated at 140 °C for 24 h. After the autoclave was cooled to room
temperature at a rate of 10 °C min-1, light yellow block crystals of the
metal compounds (1-3) were obtained. The absence of solvent was
confirmed by thermogravimetric and elemental analyses (EA). Phase
purity was confirmed by PXRD (Fig. S4).
[19]
least-squares technique within ShelXL2015 and OLEX.2.
All
non-hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic thermal factors.
Because of the noncentrosymmetric space group and a Flack parameter
about 0.5 of 1 and 3 an absolute structure refinement was performed
using the SHELX-2015 TWIN instruction. [20] Crystallographic data have
been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center. The
crystallographic data (CCDC-1887730, 1887731, 1887732, 1887733,
1887734, 1887735, 1887746, 1887747, 1887748 for 1, L1, L2, 2, L3, 3, 4,
5, 6, respectively) can be found in the Supporting Information or can be
obtained free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre
1.Anal. Calcd for Zn(C16H12N4)Cl2: C 48.46, H 3.56 and N 14.13. Found
(%): C 48.32, H 3.69, and N 14.09. Selected IR (KBr): 3221 (s), 1590 (w),
1457 (m), 1349 (m), 1230 (w), 1146 (w), 1042 (m), 805 (m), 749 (s), 587
(m). Yield, 55 mg, 14% based on L1.
Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry (ESI-MS). ESI-MS
measurements were conducted at a capillary temperature of 275 °C.
Aliquots of the solution were injected into the device at 0.3 mL/h. The
mass spectrometer used for the measurements was a Thermo Exactive
Plus, and the data were collected in positive and negative ion modes. The
spectrometer was calibrated with the standard tune mix to give a precision
of ca. 2 ppm in the region of 200−2000 m/z. The capillary voltage was 50
V, the tube lens voltage was 150 V, and the skimmer voltage was 25 V.
The in-source energy was set to the range of 0−100 eV with a gas flow
rate at 15% of the maximum. Preliminary ESI-MS has been used to probe
the integrity and behaviour of the cluster in solution, and detection of trace
intermediates of time dependent under photoexcitation. Due to the
solubility limitation in CH3CN, CH3OH and H2O, the crystals of them were
dissolved in DMSO and diluted with CH3OH for ESI-MS at 275 °C with
positive mode.
2.Anal. Calcd for Zn(C18H16N4)Cl2: C 50.91, H 3.80, and N 13.19. Found
(%): C 50.85, H 3.77 and N 13.25. Selected IR (KBr): 3068 (w), 2957 (w),
1593 (w), 1470 (s), 1339 (m), 1240 (m), 1146 (w), 1018(w), 918 (w), 857
(w), 748 (s), 559 (w). Yield, 80 mg, 19% based on L2.
3.Anal. Calcd for Zn(C16H14N4)Cl2: C 48.21, H 3.54 and N 14.06. Found
(%): C 48.32, H 3.63, and N 14.17. Selected IR (KBr): 3289 (s), 3196 (s),
1620 (w), 1542 (m), 1462 (s), 1340 (m), 1279 (m), 1208 (m), 1060 (s), 552
(m). Yield: 45 mg, 23% based on L’.
4. Anal. Calcd for Fe(C16H14N4)Cl2: C 52.08, H 3.89 and N 13.50. Found
(%): C 51.92, H 4.01, and N 13.27. Selected IR (KBr): 3078 (w), 2954 (w),
1602 (w), 1474 (s), 1366 (m), 1341 (m), 1307 (m), 1239 (m), 1151 (m),
858(m), 753 (s), 558 (w). Yield: 115 mg, 28% based on L2.
Density Functional Theory Calculations. Density functional theory
calculations were carried out using B3LYP/6-311g*, functional adding the
D3 version of Grimme’s dispersion with Becke-Johnson damping, SDD for
Zn and 6-31+g basis sets for other elements using Gaussian 09 software.
5. Anal. Calcd for Co(C16H14N4)Cl2: C 51.70, H 3.86 and N 13.40. Found
(%): C 51.12, H 3.99, and N 13.68. Selected IR (KBr): 3058 (w), 2945 (w),
1602 (w), 1466 (s), 1342 (s), 1307 (m), 1243 (m), 1154 (w), 851(m), 756
(s), 537 (w). Yield: 178 mg, 43% based on L2.
[21]
[22]
Bonding order were analyzed using Multiwfn software.
The
geometry of LZnCl2 were fully optimized assuming C4 symmetry, Mayer
bond order was then calculated based on the optimized geometry.
Attempt to calculate complexation energies of different possible
fragments based on single-crystal geometry failed due to scf convergence
problem.
6. Anal. Calcd for Ni(C16H14N4)Cl2: C 51.73, H 3.86 and N 13.41. Found
(%): C 51.27, H 4.11, and N 13.13. Selected IR (KBr): 3068 (w), 2944 (w),
1593 (w), 1470 (s), 1336 (m), 1341 (m), 1303 (w), 1236 (m), 1156 (m),
858(m), 753 (s), 564 (w). Yield: 205 mg, 49% based on L2.
Materials and methods
Optical Properties. Emission and excitation spectra and emission
lifetimes were measured using the same slit and iris. The solid-state
quantum yields of powder samples in sealed quartz cuvettes and as films
spin-coated on quartz substrates were measured using the integrating
All chemicals were obtained from commercial sources and used as
received without further purification. Elemental analyses for C, H, and N
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.