P. Herold et al. / Tetrahedron 56 (2000) 6497±6499
6499
program enabled us to ®nd suitable crystallization condi-
tions where 7 of .72% ee was enriched to .99% ee in
one crystallization step with yields between 50 and 70%,
depending on the starting ee.
Crystallization of ethyl (R)-2-hydroxy-4-oxo-phenyl-
butyrate (7). 74 g (0.332 mol) of the residue of the hydro-
genation was dissolved in 220 ml diisopropyl ether. Seeding
crystals of enantiomerically pure (R)-2-hydroxy-4-oxo ester
7 were added and the solution was slowly cooled to 58C.
Yield of (R)-2-hydroxy-4-oxo ester 7: 47 g, 64%, product
content .99%, ee 99% (hplc, for method see 6), mp 36±
388C. The 1H NMR and the 13C NMR spectra were identical
with the one described above. [a]2D5111.5 (c10, EtOH).
It is well known that aromatic ketones can be hydrogenated
to the corresponding hydrocarbons in the presence of Pd
catalysts.10 However, catalyst activity is often low requiring
high catalyst loadings and/or acidic conditions. As shown in
Table 2, reasonable reaction times and very high chemo-
selectivity for the removal of the 4-keto group in 7 were
indeed only achieved in the presence of a strong acid. Based
on these results and further optimization of catalyst type and
reaction conditions, a technical process was established
operating at 1.1 bar at 408C with a reaction time of ,6 h
giving .98% 5 with .99% ee containing ca. 1% (R)-2-
hydroxy acid.
Typical hydrogenolysis procedure of ethyl (R)-2-
hydroxy-4-oxo-phenylbutyrate (7). 46 g crystallized
(R)-2-hydroxy-4-oxo ester 7 (ee .99%) was hydrogenated
in 170 ml ethanol at 208C and 1.1 bar hydrogen pressure in a
glass autoclave in the presence of 1.0 wt% of a 5% Pd/C
(460 mg) catalyst and 5 wt% HCl. After hydrogen uptake
had stopped (5±6 h), the catalyst was ®ltered off and the
solvent was evaporated in vacuo. Yield of 5: 42 g, 98%,
1
In conclusion, the new route described above gives an
ef®cient and cost effective access to 5 that is now developed
further in collaboration with the Life Science Molecules
group of Ciba Specialty Chemicals (Ciba LSM) in order
to produce t/y quantities for commercialization.
product content .98% according to H NMR (1H NMR
(CDCl3): 7.15±7.35 (m, 5H), 4.15±4.25 (m, 3H), 2.70±
2.90 (m, 3H), 2.05±2.20 (m, 2H), 1.90±2.00 (m, 2H), 1.30
(t, 3H), ee .99% (hplc, OD±H, hexane/ethanol/TFA970/
30/0.4):); byproduct: ,0.1% (R)-2-hydroxy-4-phenyl-
butyric acid.
Experimental
All reagents and solvents were purchased from Fluka and
Acknowledgements
1
used as received. H an 13C NMR spectra were recorded in
CDCl3 using a Bruker dpx 400 Fourier transform NMR
spectrometer and data reported using the chemical shift
scale in units of ppm relative to SiMe4. Mass Spec analysis
was carried out on a MAT 212 Finnigan apparatus, with EI
ionization. HPLC analysis was carried out on a HP 1100
apparatus. Ethyl 2,4-dioxo-phenylbutyrate was synthesized
according to the literature.11
This project was carried out for and in collaboration with the
Life Science Molecules group of Ciba Specialty Chemicals
(Ciba LSM). We would like to thank F. Spindler, A. Hafner,
H. Probst and R. Sommerlade for valuable discussions
and A. Boos, S. Burkhardt, A. Tarman and W. Schmidt
for careful experimental work.
Hydrogenation of ethyl 2,4-dioxo-phenylbutyrate (6), ee
optimized procedure. 2.0 g diketo ester 6 in 30 ml toluene
were hydrogenated at 258C and 60 bar hydrogen pressure in
a 50 ml stainless steel autoclave in the presence of 50 mg
5% Pt/Al2O3 (pretreated for 2 h in H2 at 4008C) and 5 mg
10,11-dihydrocinchonidine. After hydrogen uptake had
stopped (ca. 160 min), the catalyst was ®ltered off and the
solution was evaporated to dryness at reduced pressure.
Yield of 7: 1.97 g, 98%, product content .97% (NMR),
ee 86% (hplc, OD±H, hexane/EtOH 98.5/1.5, ¯ow 0.7 ml/
min; retention time: (S)-enantiomer 46.0 min, (R)-enantio-
References
1. Sheldon, R. A. Chimica Oggi 1991 (May), 35.
È
2. Attwood, M. R.; Hassall, C. H.; Krohn, A.; Lawton, G.;
Redshaw, S. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. I 1986, 1011.
3. Schmidt, E.; Blaser, H. U.; Fauquex, P. F.; Sedelmeier, G.;
Spindler, F. Microbial Reagents in Organic Synthesis; Servi, S.,
Ed.; Kluwer: Dordrecht, 1992, p 377.
4. Schmid, R.; Broger, E. A. Proceedings of the ChiralEurope'94
Symposium, Spring Innovation: Stockport, UK, 1994 (pp 79).
5. Blaser, H. U.; Jalett, H. P. Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 1993, 78, 139.
6. Studer, M.; Herold, P.; Indolese, A.; Burkhardt, S. WO 9950223
(31.03.1998, assigned to Ciba LSM), CAN 1999:640817.
7. Beyer, C.; Claisen, L. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1887, 20, 2178.
8. Blaser, H. U.; Jalett, H. P.; Spindler, F. J. Mol. Catal. A:
Chemical 1996, 107, 85.
1
mer 49.6 min). MS M1: 222. H NMR (CDCl3): 7.95 (d,
2H), 7.60 (dd, 1H), 7.45 (dd, 2H), 4.65 (m, 1H), 4.25 (q,
2H), 3.30±3.60 (m, 3H), 1.30 (t, 3H). 13C NMR (CDCl3),
198, 174, 136, 134, 129, 128, 67, 62, 42, 14 ppm.
Hydrogenation of 6, volume yield optimized procedure.
80.0 g diketo ester 6 in 120 ml toluene were hydrogenated at
258C and 58 bar hydrogen pressure in a 300 ml stainless
steel autoclave in the presence of 2.00 g 5% Pt/Al2O3
(pretreated for 2 h in H2 at 4008C) and 200 mg 10,11-
dihydrocinchonidine. After hydrogen uptake had stopped
(ca. 140 min), the catalyst was ®ltered off and the solution
was evaporated to dryness at reduced pressure. Yield of 7:
76.0 g, 94%, product content .97% (NMR), ee 76% (hplc).
9. For a detailed description see Studer, M.; Burkhardt, S.;
Indolese, A.; Blaser, H. U.; Solvias A. G. Chem. Commun. 2000
p 1327.
10. Rylander, P. Catalytic Hydrogenation in Organic Synthesis,
Academic Press: London, 1979 (pp 103).
11. Wakabayashi, Y.; Miyata, A.; Sato, H. JP 4149154
(22.5.1992), CAN 117:170989.