A R T I C L E S
Yoshihara et al.
A further experiment interpreted as supporting a TICT structure
is the syn-anti photoisomerization observed with a cyanopy-
ridine derivative in the protic solvent methanol at low temper-
ature.19
Chart 1
The main arguments in favor of PICT are based on the finding
that the amino and benzonitrile parts in the ICT state of a series
of 4-(dialkylamino)benzonitriles show a substantial electronic
coupling (considered to be absent in a TICT state),14 as well as
from the observation that efficient ICT occurs in planarized
4
-aminobenzonitriles with a seven-membered (1-methyl-7-
These measurements allow a direct conclusion regarding the
structure of the ICT state in these dual fluorescent molecules.
cyano-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-1-benzazepine) or a six-membered
(1-tert-butyl-6-cyano-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoline, NTC6) ali-
1
5,20,21
Experimental Section
cyclic ring.
As mentioned above, the absence of dual
fluorescence with the 1-methyl and also the 1-ethyl derivative
of NTC6 was considered to be one of the main experimental
arguments leading to the TICT model. Further support for the
N-Phenylpyrrole (PP; Chart 1) was purchased from Aldrich. In the
3
0,31
synthesis of 9H-pyrrolo-[1,2-a]-indole (fluorazene, FPP),
1-(2-
3
carboxyphenyl)pyrrole (Maybridge) was reacted with PCl in toluene
5
4
under addition of SnCl . The 9H-pyrrolo-[1,2-a]-indol-9-one thus
PICT model comes from picosecond X-ray diffraction measure-
ments with crystalline 4-(diisopropylamino)benzonitrile
obtained was treated with semicarbazide hydrochloride, giving the
corresponding semicarbazone, which upon heating to 220-230 °C in
diethylene glycol produced fluorazene (mp 88.6-89.6 °C. Literature
9-90 °C (ref 30)). With PP and FPP, HPLC was the last purification
step. The identity of FPP was established by NMR and mass
(
DIABN).22 This molecule was chosen because it undergoes
10
efficient ICT in the crystal. The dihedral angle of the amino
group relative to the phenyl plane of DIABN was found to be
8
1
0° in the ICT state, an effectively coplanar configuration, as
spectroscopy. The assignment is based on two-dimensional NMR
22
compared with 14° in the ground state.
spectra (HH-COSY, HSQC, HMBC). The
1
H and 13C NMR spectra
1
were measured with a Varian Mercury 300 spectrometer. H NMR (300
In view of these results, it can be concluded that the absence
TICT) or presence (PICT) of electronic coupling between the
MHz, CDCl
3
, in ppm) for FPP: 3.83 (s, br, CH
m, H4), 7.27 (m, H5), 7.26 (m, H6), 7.09 (m, H8), 7.08 (t, H9), 6.1
m, H10). The alkylcyanide solvents acetonitrile (MeCN, Merck,
2
), 7.38 (d, H3), 7.08
(
(
(
D and A groups in the ICT state of a D/A molecule, such as
that between the phenyl and pyrrole moieties in PP, clearly is
a more significant difference between the two ICT models than
the presence of an exclusively perpendicular (90°) or coplanar
Uvasol), ethyl cyanide (EtCN, Fluka, for analysis), n-propyl cyanide
PrCN, Fluka, for analysis), and n-butyl cyanide (BuCN, Fluka, pure)
were chromatographed over Al . The solutions, with an optical
(
2 3
O
(0°) configuration. In other words, electronic coupling between
density between 0.4 and 0.6 for the maximum of the first band in the
absorption spectrum, were deaerated with nitrogen (15 min).
The fluorescence spectra were measured with quantum-corrected
Shimadzu RF-5000PC or ISA-SPEX Fluorolog 3-22 spectrofluoro-
the D and A subgroups is more important than their twist angle.
Quantumchemical calculations of dual fluorescent D/A
molecules such as DMABN and PP, at various levels of
sophistication, practically all came to the conclusion that the
meters. Fluorescence quantum yields Φ
ibility of 2%, were determined with quinine sulfate in 1.0 N H
a standard (Φ
) 0.546 at 25 °C).32 The fluorescence decay times were
obtained with a picosecond laser system (excitation wavelength λexc
76 nm) consisting of a mode-locked titanium-sappire laser (Coherent,
f
, with an estimated reproduc-
2
SO as
4
3,23-29
ICT state has a TICT structure.
The possibility of a planar
f
ICT state was, however, generally not taken into account. In
:
28
recent calculations, a PICT state was investigated for DMABN,
PP, and PP4C, but it was likewise concluded that a TICT state
is the most likely molecular structure for the lowest-energy and
hence fluorescing ICT state. On the basis of time-dependent
density functional theory (TDDFT) calculations with DMABN,
it was even concluded that final evidence was provided in favor
of the perpendicular twist interpretation and that the TICT-
PICT controversy, mainly originating from a discussion of
2
MIRA 900F) pumped by an argon ion laser (Coherent, Innova 415) or
with a nanosecond (λexc: 296 nm) flashlamp single-photon counting
(SPC) setup. These setups and the procedure used for the analysis of
3
3,34
the fluorescence decays have been described previously.
The
instrument response function of the laser SPC system has a half-width
of 18 ps.
Results and Discussion
experimental evidence, thereby should become a part of
history.29
Fluorescence Spectra. The fluorescence spectrum of FPP
in the polar solvent acetonitrile (MeCN) at -45 °C (Figure 1a)
consists of two well-separated bands, similar to the LE and ICT
emissions of PP (Figure 1b). The two bands are separated by
subtraction with the fluorescence spectrum of N-(4-methylphe-
nyl)pyrrole (PP4M) adopted as the LE model compound, as
Here we report on ICT and dual fluorescence observed with
fluorazene (FPP; Chart 1), a rigidized planar derivative of PP.
(
19) Dobkowski, J.; W o´ jcik, J.; Ko z´ mi n´ ski, W.; Kołos, R.; Waluk, J.; Michl, J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 2406.
(
20) Zachariasse, K. A.; Grobys, M.; von der Haar, Th.; Hebecker, A.; Il’ichev,
Yu. V.; Morawski, O.; R u¨ ckert, I.; K u¨ hnle, W. J. Photochem. Photobiol.,
A 1997, 105, 373.
6
PP4M does not undergo an ICT reaction. Analogous to the
ICT/LE fluorescence quantum yield ratio Φ′(ICT)/Φ(LE) of PP,
the band intensity ratio of FPP becomes smaller with decreasing
(21) Zachariasse, K. A.; Druzhinin, S. I.; Bosch, W.; Machinek, R. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2004, 126, 1705.
(
(
(
(
(
22) Techert, S.; Zachariasse, K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 5593.
23) Dreyer, J.; Kummrow, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2577.
24) Parusel, A. B. J. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2000, 2, 5545.
25) Jamorski J o¨ dicke, C.; L u¨ thi, H. P. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117, 4146.
26) Proppe, B.; Merch a´ n, M.; Serrano-Andr e´ s, L. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104,
(30) Laschtuvka, E.; Huisgen, R. Chem. Ber. 1960, 93, 81.
(31) Sydney Bailey, A.; Scott, P. W.; Vandrevala, M. N. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 2, 1980, 97.
(32) Demas, J. N.; Crosby, G. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1971, 75, 991.
(33) Zachariasse, K. A.; Yoshihara, T.; Druzhinin. S. I. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002,
106, 6325. Erratum: J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 8978.
(34) Il’ichev, Yu. V.; K u¨ hnle, W.; Zachariasse, K. A. Chem. Phys. 1996, 211,
441.
1
608.
(
(
(
27) Mennucci, B.; Toniolo, A.; Tomasi, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 10621.
28) Zilberg, S.; Haas, Y. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 1.
29) Rappoport, D.; Furche, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1277.
8536 J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 126, NO. 27, 2004