Regiospecific Nitration of Phenols with Metal Nitrates
Table 3 Synthesis of o-nitrophenol in the presence of different
Synlett 2000, 1485.
solvents with Th(NO ) •5H O using KHSO as a catalyst under
refluxing condition
8
9
0
1
2
Gu, S.; Jing, H.; Wu, J.; Liang, Y. Synth. Commun. 1997, 27,
2793.
Smith, K.; Musson, A.; DeBoos, G. A. Chem. Commun.
3
4
2
4
a
Entry Solvent Catalyst Temperature/℃ Time/min Yield /%
1
996, 469.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Acetonitrile KHSO
Ethyl acetate KHSO
4
4
Reflux
Reflux
Reflux
Reflux
Reflux
Reflux
25
30
35
45
50
50
95
92
90
89
87
86
1
1
1
Waller, G.; Barrett, A. G. M.; Braddock, D. C.; Ramprasad,
D. Chem. Commun. 1997, 613, and references cited therein.
Delaude, L.; Laszlo, P.; Smith, K. Acc. Chem. Res. 1993, 26,
Acetone
THF
KHSO4
6
07.
KHSO4
KHSO4
KHSO4
Laszlo, P. Acc. Chem. Res. 1986, 19, 121.
CHCl3
CH Cl
13 Cornelis, A.; Laszlo, P.; Pennetreau, P. Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg.
984, 93, 961.
1
2
2
1
1
4
5
Zeegers, P. G. Chem. Ed. 1993, 70, 1036.
Pervas, H.; Onysiuka, S. O.; Rees, L.; Rooney, J. R.; Suck-
ling, G. J. Tetrahedron 1988, 44, 4555.
Furniss, B. S.; Hannaford, A. J.; Smith, P. W. G.; Tatchell, A.
R. Vogel’s Text Book of Practical Organic Chemistry, 4th
ed., Longman, London & New York, 1986.
Bruice, T. C.; Gregor, M. G.; Walters, S. L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1986, 90, 1612.
a
Yields were obtained by GC.
Typical experimental procedure
1
6
7
To a stirred solution of phenol (1 mmol) in acetoni-
trile (5 mL) was added metal nitrate (1 mmol) followed
by a catalytic amount of KHSO (0.012 mmol) and the
4
1
reaction mixture was refluxed until all the phenol was
consumed The progress of the reaction was monitored
by TLC using petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (V∶V=
1
1
8
9
Crivello, J. V. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 3056.
Oueartani, M.; Girad, P.; Kagan, H. B. Tetrahedron Lett.
4
∶1) as eluent. After completion of the reaction, the
1
982, 23, 4315.
catalyst was filtered. The mixture was then washed with
saturated sodium hydrogen carbonate (10 mL) and the
product extracted into dichloromethane (5 mL×2). The
combined organic extracts were washed with distilled
20
21
22
Poirier, J. M.; Vottero, C. Tetrahedron 1989, 45, 1415.
Thompson, M. J.; Zeegers, P. J. Tetrahedron 1989, 45, 191.
Tapia, R.; Torres, G.; Valderrama, J. A. Synth. Commun.
1
986, 16, 681.
Gaude, D.; Goallar, R. L.; Pierre, J. L. Synth. Commun.
986, 16, 63.
4
water (10 mL), dried over anhydrous MgSO and the
23
24
25
26
27
28
solvent was removed by evaporation to afford the ni-
trated compound.
1
Gigante, B.; Prazeres, A. O.; Marcelo-Curto, M. J. J. Org.
Chem. 1995, 60, 3445.
Rodrigues, J. A. R.; Filho, A. O. P.; Moran, P. J. S.
Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 6733.
Vogel, A. I. Vogel's Text Book of Practical Organic Chemis-
try, 5 th ed., Longman Group UK, Harlow, UK, 1989.
Clark, J. H. Chemistry of Waste Minimization, Chapman and
Hall, London, 1995.
Schofield, K. Aromatic Nitration, Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, 1980.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the mono-nitration of phenols with a
4
metal nitrate and KHSO has been achieved with high
regiospecificity in excellent GC yields. In general, ex-
clusive ortho-selectivity was observed for all the phe-
nols subjected to this protocol. The high regiospecificity,
with excellent GC yields and the use of inexpensive and
4
easily accessible KHSO as the catalyst makes this
2
3
9
0
Ridd, J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1991, 20, 149.
Lankaster, N. L.; Liopis-Mestre, V. Chem. Commun. 2003,
methodology of wide synthetic and commercial utility.
This method offers some advantages in terms of sim-
plicity of performance, easy work-up, use of inexpen-
sive, available and easy to handle catalyst and high
yields of products and relatively short reaction time.
2
812.
3
1
2
Prakash, G. K. S.; Panja, C.; Mathew, T.; Surampudi, V.;
Petasis, N. A.; Olah, G. A. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 2205.
Ley, S. V.; Thomas, A. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42,
3
5
400.
References
3
3
3
4
Lindley, J. Tetrahedron 1984, 40, 1433.
Anuradha, V.; Srinivas, P. V.; Aparna, P.; Madhusudana Rao,
J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 4933.
Dove, M. F. A.; Manz, B.; Montagomery, J.; Patternden, G.;
Wood, S. A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1998, 1589.
Alizadeh, M. H.; Razavi, H.; Bamoharram, F. F.; Daneshvar,
K. J. Mol. Catal. 2003, 206, 89.
Heravi, M. M.; Baghernejad, B.; Oskooie, H. A. Chin. J.
Chem. 2009, 27, 379.
1
2
3
4
Becker, F. F.; Banik, B. K. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1998, 50,
877.
Ingold, C. K. Structure and Mechanism in Organic Chemis-
try, Cornell University Press, New York, 1969.
Olah, G. A.; Malhotra, R.; Narang, S. C. Nitration Methods
and Mechanisms, Chemie, New York, 1989.
Riego, J. M.; Sedin, Z.; Zaldivar, J. M.; Marziano, N. C.;
Tortato, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 513.
2
35
36
37
38
39
Heravi, M. M.; Beheshtia, Y. S.; Khorshidi, M.; Bagherne-
jad, B. Chin. J. Chem. 2009, 27, 569.
Heravi, M. M.; Poormohammad, N.; Beheshtiha, Y. S.;
5
6
7
Ridd, J. H. Acta Chem. Scand. 1998, 52, 11.
Tani, K.; Eaton, P. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 1476.
Thiebes, C.; Parakash, G. K. S.; Petasis, N. A.; Olah, G. A.
Chin. J. Chem. 2010, 28, 393— 396
© 2010 SIOC, CAS, Shanghai, & WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.cjc.wiley-vch.de
395