N.H.A. Alkefai, et al.
Phytochemistry Letters 32 (2019) 83–89
glucuronic acid and D-glucose that were identified by comparison of
TLC of the hydrolysate with the respective standards. For determination
66.3(C-7), 72.3 (C-21) and 67.8 (C-22)] in its aglycone. The spectra also
revealed the presence of three carboxylic carbons [δ 174.2 (C-23),
177.1 (C-29) and 172.9 (C-6′)]. Comparison of NMR data of 4 with
oleanane derivatives (Mahato and Kundu, 1994; Ye et al., 2001) and the
other compounds reported here clearly indicated the absence of any
acyl substitution. Thus the structure of 4 was deduced to be 3α, 7β,
21β, 22α-tetrahydroxy olean-15-en-23, 29-dioic acid-3-yl-3-O-β-D-glu-
copyranosyl (1→3) O-β-D-glucuronopyranoside.
1
1
1
13
of the linkage of acyl/sugar chain, H- H and H- C chemical shift
correlation were examined in detail. Key cross peaks between H-3 and
H-1′; H-16 and H-22; and H-21 and H-22 in COSY; along with corre-
lations between H-1′ and C-3; H-1′′ and C-3′; H-21 and C-1a; H-22 and
1
3
C-1b in HMBC spectra were observed. In C NMR spectrum, a glyco-
sylation shift of +3.6 ppm was observed for C-3 (δ 82.3 from δ 78.7 for
oleanolic acid). The signals for C-21/22 also exhibited downfield shifts
due to acylation of these carbons (Ishii et al., 1978). These finding led
to determination of 2 as 3α, 7β, 21β, 22α-tetrahydroxy-21,22-bis(2-
methyl-1-oxobutoxy)-olean-15-en-3yl-3-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl (1→3)-
O-β-D-glucuronopyranoside.
Compound 5 was obtained as light green amorphous powder from
ethyl acetate-methanol (90:10 v/v) eluents. Its FTIR spectrum showed
−
1
−1
absorption bands for hydroxyl (3418 cm ), carbonyl (1723 cm ) and
−1
13
olefinic (1645, 1448 cm ) functionalities. Based on C/DEPT and
mass spectra (Fig. S23-S25, see Supplemental material), the molecular
weight of 5 was established to be 1010 corresponding to the molecular
Compound 3 was obtained as brownish amorphous powder from
ethyl acetate-methanol (98:2 v/v) eluents. Its FTIR spectrum exhibited
formula C52
H
82
O
19. Its HR-ES-MS showed a diagnostic fragment ion
-
1
−1
+
absorption bands for hydroxyl (3450 cm ), carbonyl (1723 cm ) and
peak at m/z 846.5386 for [C46
H
70
O
14
]
(calc. 846.4766) arising due to
−1
13
olefinic (1650, 1441 cm ) functionalities. Based on C/DEPT and
mass spectra (Fig. S15-S17, see Supplemental material), the molecular
the loss of a glucose residue from the molecular ion.
1
The H NMR spectrum of 5 (Fig. S22, see Supplemental material)
weight of 3 was determined to be 978, consistent with molecular for-
exhibited signals for one tigloyl moiety [δ 7.01 (brm, H-3b), 1.61 (br d,
1
mula C52
H
82
O
17 (calc. 978.5052, obsd. 978.4949). The H NMR spec-
H
3
-4b) and 2.03 (s, H -5b)] and one methyl butyroyl moiety [δ 2.48 (m,
3
trum of 3 (Fig. S14, see Supplemental material) exhibited signals for a
tigloyl moiety [δ 6.78 (m, H-3b), 1.85 (m, H -4b) and 2.08 (s, H -5b)]
and a methyl butyroyl moiety [δ 2.59 (m, H-2a), 1.54 (m, H -3a),
.71(brs, H -4a) and 1.21 (d, J =6.0 Hz, H -5a)]. The signals for two
H-2a), 1.60 (m, H
2
-3a), 0.72 (s, H
3
-4a) and 1.19 (d, J =7.0 Hz, H -5a)].
3
3
3
2
The presence of two anomeric proton signals at δ 4.51 (d, J =6.5 Hz, H-
1′) and 4.40 (d, J =7.0 Hz, H-1′′), and two anomeric carbon signals at δ
105.4 (C-1′) and 104.3 (C-1′′) supported the presence of two sugar
units. Comparison of TLC of the hydrolysate of 5 with reference stan-
dards confirmed the presence of D-glucuronic acid and D-glucose.
0
3
3
anomeric carbons at δ 110.0 (C-1′) and 115.0 (C-1′′), and two anomeric
protons at δ 4.29 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, H-1′) and 4.19 (d, J =6.5 Hz, H-1′′)
revealed the presence of two sugar units. A detailed examination of
NMR spectra particularly that of the saccharide region supported the
presence of the same sugar chain in 3 as in 2. Acid hydrolysis of 3
afforded D-glucuronic acid and D-glucose that were identified by
comparison of TLC of the hydrolysate with the respective standards.
Significant downfield shift were observed for C-3 of glycone to δ 79.4
and for C-3′ of glucuronic acid to δ 89.7 due to glycosylation. The
signals for C-21 and C-22 also exhibited downfield shifts to δ 73.3 and δ
1
3
Further, C NMR spectrum showed significant downfield shift experi-
enced by C-3 to δ 81.9 and by C-3′ to δ 89.7 supporting the glycosy-
lation at δ C-3 of aglycone and C-3′ of glucuronic acid. The signals for C-
21 and C-22 also displayed downfield shift to δ 73.9 and 68.4, re-
spectively due to acylation at these positions (Ishii et al., 1978).
1
3
The C/DEPT NMR spectra of 5 also displayed signals for three
hydroxy methyl carbons at δ 61.3 (C-23), 63.2 (C-28) and 63.4 (C-6′′);
and four carbinol carbons at δ 81.9 (C-3), 66.4 (C-7), 73.9 (C-21) and
68.4 (C-22). Comparison of spectra data of 5 with that of 1 and other
hydroxylated gymnemic acids (Yoshikawa et al., 1989a, 1989b), sup-
ported 5 to be a hexahydroxy oleanane derivative. A doublet of doub-
lets at δ 3.75 (J = 2.0, 8.5 Hz) was assigned to H-3 carbinol proton that
was placed in α-orientation based on high coupling constant value. On
the basis of the foregoing account, the structure of 5 was elucidated as
3β, 7β, 21β, 22α, 23,28-hexahydroxy-21-(2-methyl-1-oxobutoxy)-22-
[(2-methyl-1-oxobutenyl)oxy]-olean-15-en-3-yl-3-O-β-D-glucopyr-
anosyl(1→3) O-β-D-glucuronopyranoside. It is noteworthy that the
6
9.0, respectively that can be attributed to acylation f these carbons
13
(
Ishii et al., 1978). C NMR spectrum of 3 also supported the presence
of four oxygenated carbons [δ 79.4 (C-3), 66.3 (C-7), 73.3 (C-21) and
6
9.0 (C-22)] in its aglycone. Comparison of NMR data of compound 3
with that of compound 2 revealed that 3 has one tigloyl and one methyl
butyroyl unit compared to two methyl butyroyl units in 2. Thus com-
pound 3 was identified as 3α, 7β, 21β, 22α-tetrahydroxy-21-(2-methyl-
1
-oxobutoxy)-22-[(2-methyl-1-oxobutenyl)oxy] olean-15-en-3yl-3-O-β-
D-glucopyranosyl(1→3) O-β-D-glucuronopyranoside.
1
5
Compound 4 was obtained as white amorphous powder from ethyl
acetate-methanol (90:10 v/v) eluents. Its FTIR spectrum showed ab-
compounds 1-5 represent Δ oleanane-type gymnemic acids (all acy-
12
lated except 4) compared to the arylated Δ oleanane series of gym-
nemic acids reported earlier by our group (Alkefai et al., 2018).
Compounds 1-5 were screened for α-glucosidase inhibitory activity
at concentrations ranging from 31.25–500 μg/ml. All the compounds
showed dose-dependent inhibition of α-glucosidase as shown in Fig. 2.
The maximum inhibition was achieved with compound 4 (IC50 57 μg/
ml) followed by 3 (IC50 62 μg/ml), 1 (IC50 80 μg/ml), 2 (IC50 120 μg/
ml) and 5 (IC50 128 μg/ml). IC50 values for acarbose and crude gym-
nemic acid (CGA) were found to be 95 μg/ml and 170 μg/ml, respec-
tively. It is noteworthy that the compounds 3 and 4 were about three
fold more potent than the CGA (Table S1, see Supplemental material).
Compounds 3 could not be screened further for the lack of sufficient
quantity. Compounds 1 and 4 were screened for their effect on blood
glucose in oral sucrose tolerance test in mice at a dose of 10 mg/kg b.w.
after oral administration.
-
1
-1
sorption bands for hydroxyl (3399 cm ), carbonyl (1724 cm ), olefinic
-
1
(
1643, 1455 cm ) functionalities. Its HR-ES-MS (Fig. S21, see
Supplemental material) displayed
a
molecular ion peak at m/z
8
8
72.5179 that accounted to the molecular formula C42 19 (calc.
64
H O
72.4997). The formula indicated the presence of eleven double bond
equivalents, five of which were attributed to pentacyclic framework,
three to carboxylic groups, two to sugar units and the remaining one to
1
a vinylic linkage. A two-proton broad signal δ 5.74 in H NMR spectrum
1
3
and a single signal in the olefinic region of the C NMR spectrum at δ
1
29.2 indicated the presence of the only vinylic linkage between two
equivalent carbons that was consequently placed at C-15. The presence
of two anomeric proton signals at δ 4.31 (d, J =8.5 Hz, H-1′), and 4.23
(
d, J =8.0 Hz (H-1′′), and two anomeric carbon signals at δ 105.4 (C-1′)
and 104.3 (C-1′′) further supported presence of two sugar units (Fig.
S18 and S19, see Supplemental material). TLC comparison of the hy-
drolysate of 4 revealed the sugars to be D-glucuronic acid and D-glu-
Oral administration of sucrose (4 g/kg, b.w.) produced a significant
increase (p < 0.01) in blood glucose level (BGL) of sucrose-challenged
control animals, resulting in carbohydrate induced hyperglycemia. It is
evident from Fig. 3 that a pre-treatment compounds 1 and 4 (each10
mg/kg, b.w., p.o.) blunted the effect of sucrose challenge as signified by
less than 65 mg/dL increase in peak blood glucose level after 30 min of
sucrose overload compared to about 95 mg/dL increment in sucrose
1
3
cose. Further, C NMR spectrum showed significant downfield shift
experienced by C-3 to δ 82.7 and by C-3′ to δ 89.7, indicating the
1
3
glycosylation at δ C-3 of aglycone and C-3′ of glucuronic acid. C/
DEPT NMR spectra (Fig. S19, S20, see Supplemental material) of 4
indicated the presence of four oxygenated carbons [δ 82.2 (C-3),
86