1
20
T. Hari Babu et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 117–120
2
5
Sigma) (t
R
: 4.1 min) and measurement of their optical rotations (½
aꢁ
+26.4, c
Acknowledgment
D
0
.05 H O).
2
2
5
ꢂ46.4 (c 0.05 MeOH). 1H
2
1. Spectral data for 1: pale yellow solid, mp 165 °C; ½
aꢁ
D
Authors gratefully acknowledge keen interest of Dr. J. S. Yadav,
Director, IICT, Hyderabad, India.
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3 + MeOH-d ): d 5.46 (1H, 12.0, 3.0 Hz, H-2), 3.14, (1H, dd,
4
J = 17.5, 12.0 Hz, H-3ax), 2.82 (1H, dd, J = 17.5 3.0 Hz, H-3eq), 3.85 (3H, s, OMe-
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
), 6.28 (1H, s, H-8), 7.57–7.48 (2H, m, H-2 , 6 ), 7.45–7.39 (3H, m, H-3 , 4 , 5 ),
0
0
00
00
00
.02 (1H, d, J = 7.8 Hz, H-1 ), 3.70–3.52 (3H, m, H-2 , 3 , 4 ), 4.02 (1H, d,
References and notes
00
00 13
J = 4.0 Hz, H-5 ), 3.78 (3H, s, OMe-6 ). C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl
3 4
+ MeOH-d ): d
8
0.89 (C-2), 44.37 (C-3), 198.78 (C-4), 159.26 (C-5), 132.13 (C-6), 156.44 (C-7),
0 0 0
96.15 (C-8), 159.88 (C-9), 105.37 (C-10), 139.98 (C-1 ), 127.48 (C-2 ,6 ), 129.85
1
2
.
.
Laine, L. Rev. Gastroenterol. Disord. 2004, 4, S33.
Roth, A. L. J. In Gasteroenterolgy; Bockers, H. L., Ed.; Saunders: Philadelphia,
0 0 0 00 00 00 00
(C-3 , 4 , 5 ), 101.52 (C-1 ), 77.00 (C-2 ), 76.75 (C-3 ), 74.33 (C-4 ), 72.77 (C-
+
00 00
5 ), 170.75 (C-6 ), 61.75 (OMe), 53.15 (OMe). ESIMS: m/z 499 [M+Na] .
+
1
974.
3
4
.
.
Salim, S. A. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1987, 39, 553.
Kumar, V.; Cotran, R.; Robbins, S., 6th ed.. In Pathogenic Basis of Disease; W.B.
Saunders, 1999; Vol. 18.
HRESIMS: m/z 499.1535 [M+Na] (calcd for C23
24
H O11, 499.1216).
22. Spectral data for 2: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl
+ MeOH-d
): d 6.42 (1H, s, H-3),
3
4
0
6.42 (1H, d, J = 2 Hz, H-6), 6.34 (1H, d, J = 2 Hz, H-8), 6.82 (1H, d, J = 8 Hz, H-3 ),
0
0
5
6
.
.
Bays, E. D.; Finch, H. Nat. Prod. Rep. 1990, 409.
Peptic disorders. Peptic ulcer. The Merck Manual, 2nd Home ed.; Merck & Co.:
New Jersy, 2000; Chapter 14, p 13.
7.40 (1H, t, J = 8 Hz, H-4 ), 6.70 (1H, d, J = 8 Hz, H-5 ), 4.97 (1H, d, J = 7.8 Hz, H-
00 00 00 00
1 ), 3.89–3.70 (2H, m, H-2 , H-3 ), 3.10–2.90 (1H, m, H-4 ), 3.55–3.40 (2H, m,
13
0
0
00
H-5 , H-6 ), 3.95 (3H, s, OMe), 3.90 (3H, s, OMe).
CDCl + MeOH-d ): d 161.87 (C-2), 113.33 (C-3), 182.64 (C-4), 161.05 (C-5),
98.04 (C-6), 165.39 (C-7), 92.48 (C-8), 158.76 (C-9), 105.54 (C-10), 112.33 (C-
C NMR (75 MHz,
7
8
9
.
.
.
Maurya, R.; Gupta, P.; Gupta, C. M. In Perspective on Biodiversity—A Vision for
Megadiverse Countries; Verma, D. D., Arora, S., Rai, R. K., Eds.; Ministry of
Environment and Forest, Government of India: New Delhi, 2006; p 295.
Shastri, R, et al., Eds.; Charak Samhita of Agnivesha. Vidyabhavan Ayurveda
Granthamal 32. Chaukhambha Vidya Bhavan, Banaras (India) Ch. Chi. 13, 1962;
pp 170–171.
3
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 ), 158.37 (C-2 ), 105.73 (C-3 ), 132.56 (C-4 ), 108.35 (C-5 ), 156.25 (C-6 ),
101.46 (C-1 ), 73.21 (C-2 ), 76.60 (C-3 ), 69.93 (C-4 ), 76.80 (C-5 ), 61.81 (C-
6 ), 56.09 (OMe), 55.76 (OMe). ESIMS: m/z 499. HRESIMS: m/z 499.1211
24
[M+Na] (calcd for C23H O11, 499.1216).
0
0
00
00
00
00
0
0
+
Yetkin, G.; Celebi, N.; Ozer, C.; Gonul, B.; Ozogul, C. Int. J. Pharm. 2004, 277, 163.
23. Rao, J. M.; Babu, K. S.; Babu, T. H.; Manjulatha, T.; Purohit, M. J.; Srinivas. P. V.;
Yadav, J. S. US Patent 20070213281, 2007.
1
0. Jayaraj, A. P.; Lewin, F. I.; Tovey, M. E.; Clark, K. C. G. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1988, 146,
65.
1. Ogle, C. W.; Cho, C. H.; Jorg, M. C.; Koo, M. W. L. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1985, 112,
99.
2
24. Animal experiments: male Wister rats (170–180 g Body weight) were purchased
from National Institution of Nutrition, Hyderabad, India. All the experiments
were performed as per the norms and permission of institutional ethical
committee of University of Gulbarga, Gulbarga, India. In each group six animals
were taken. In brief, experiments were carried out as follows: (i) Pylorus
ligation test: 48-h food deprived animals were given test samples in respective
dosages. After 1 h of test sample administration (1% Twen-80 suspension, 1 mL
each rat), abdominal cavity was cut open under anesthesia and stomach was
ligated at pylorus end. Four hours after pylorus ligation, animals were
sacrificed and studied as reported.12 (ii) Cold restraint induced ulceritis:
experiments were performed as reported by Ogle et al.11 After oral
administration of test samples, animals were restrained to cold (4 °C) for 2 h.
Thereafter, abdominal cavity was cut open. Stomach was exposed along greater
curvature and severity of gastric ulcer was assessed in terms of mean ulcer
index. (iii) Ethanol induced ulceritis: This experiment was performed as
described by Jayaraj et al.1 Forty eight-hour fasting rats were given
respective dosages of the test sample and 1 h after oral test sample
administration, ethanol was given intragastrically. One hour after ethanol
challenge, stomach of rats was ligated at the pylorus end under anesthesia.
Four hours after pylorus ligation, animals were sacrificed for the study of ulce9r
indexing (iv) Aspirin induced ulceritis was produced according to Yetkin et al.
In this experiment, each group of animal received respective dosages test
samples for five days, followed by administration of 200 mg/kg body weight
Aspirin suspended in Tween-80 (1%). At the end of the drug administration
schedule, animals were fatsed for 24 h and sacrificed by cervical dislocation.
Their stomach was opened along the greater curvature, washed with luke
warm saline and examined under a dissecting microscope for ulcer index.
1
3
1
1
2. Alphino, R. S.; Ward, J. W. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1969, 6, 61.
3. (a) Joshi, K. C.; Singh, P.; Paudasani, R. T. Planta Med. 1978, 34, 219; (b) Gafner,
S.; Wolfender, L. J.; Nianga, M.; Stoeckli-Evans, H.; Hostettmann, K.
Phytochemistry 1996, 42, 1315.
1
1
1
1
1
1
4. Benerji, A.; Das, R. Indian J. Chem., Sect B 1977, 15B, 495.
5. Dhar, K. L.; Atal, C. K.; Pelter, A. Planta Med. 1970, 18, 332.
6. Hansel, R.; Sauer, H. Planta Med. 1967, 15, 443.
7. Subramanian, S. S.; Nair, A. G. R. Curr. Sci. 1972, 41, 62.
8. Buschi, C. A.; Pomilio, A. B.; Gros, E. G. Phytochemistry 1981, 20, 1178.
9. (a) Fang, W.; Ruan, J.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, Z.; Zou, J.; Zhou, D.; Cai, Y. J. Nat. Prod.
2
006, 69, 1641; (b) Harborne, J. B. Photochemical Methods: A Guide to Modern
Techniques of Plant Analysis; Chapman & Hall: London, 1972; (c) Somdej, K.;
Kwan Jai, K.; Komkrich, N.; Palangpon, K. J. Nat. Prod. 2004, 67, 968.
0
2
0. Acid hydrolysis of compound 1: compound 1 (10 mg) was refluxed with 7% HCl
(
10 mL) at 70 °C for 3 h. After cooling, the reaction mixture was diluted with
H
2
O and then extracted with CH Cl (2 mL each) four times. The combined
2
2
organic layers were evaporated to dryness to give residue (3 mg), which was
identified as dihydrooroxylin A (6) on the basis of TLC and spectral data (NMR
and MS).The aqueous phase was neutralized with Ag CO powder and then
2 3
filtered to remove the inorganic materials. The filtrate was concentrated to
dryness and purified by preparative HPLC (Column Phenomenex Luna (C18,
1
(
50 ꢀ 4.6 mm,
1:1); PDA detector) to yield 2 mg of sugar, respectively. The sugar
constituent of 1 was determined to be -glucuronic acid by comparison of
their HPLC retention times with that of an authentic sample (obtained from
5 lm); Solvent system: acetonitrile/water/0.1% acetic acid
D