7
176 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 65, No. 21, 2000
Arg u¨ ello et al.
7
inorganic salts such as SmI
2
. Aromatic and aliphatic
or with 2-naphthoxide ions by KI has been explained on
the basis of an ET through the exciplex formed between
halides also can be initiated by Fe2 salts. Data are now
available which characterize both the propagation cycle
and the termination steps of this reaction.1
+
8
-
14
-
the aryl halide and the I ions. Catalysis by I ions was
observed in the photoinduced reaction of bromoarenes
with diethyl phosphite ions in the acetonitrile-tetrahy-
drofuran mixture.15
,2
A photostimulated reaction between a nucleophile and
a substrate may be rather unreactive at initiation but
quite reactive at propagation. The addition of minute
amounts of another nucleophile that is more reactive at
initiation increases the generation of the reactive inter-
mediates and allows the less reactive initiation nucleo-
phile to start its own propagation. The process, thus, can
afford the substitution of an unreactive nucleophile
through an entrainment reaction, which is also a support
for the chain mechanism.1
-
ET from an excited Nu is another possibility for
initiation. This is highly probable because nucleophiles
are the best candidates for absorption in the usual
reaction conditions (λ > 350 nm). An example of the
involvement of the anion in its excited state is the
reaction of organic sulfides under laboratory light with
-
Ph
2
P
ions, which absorb strongly in the visible region
12
(λ ) 475 nm). Other evidence for this type of initiation
is the fluorescence quenching of the diphenylindenyl
anion by PhBr.16
Even though photostimulation is a widely used initia-
tion method (eq 5) there are not many studies on the
mechanism involved.
Initiation of the reaction of the 1-chloro-2-naphthoxide
anion with sodium sulfite has been proposed to occur by
ET between the excited triplet state of the substrate and
1
7
its ground state, with a quantum yield of about 50. For
the 1-bromo derivative, photohomolytic C-Br dissocia-
1
7
These photoinduced electron transfers (PET) can con-
ceivably be accomplished in one of the followings ways:
tion is proposed, with a quantum yield of about 20. The
substitution of 1-chloro-2-naphthoxide ions with sodium
sulfite can be dye photoinitiated18 or initiated by visible
light with a Ru complex as sensitizer and a Co complex
as the intermediate electron carrier.19
(
1) homolytic cleavage of the C-X bond; (2) ET from the
-
Nu to the excited ArX, generating a radical anion that
enters the cycle; (3) ET within an excited charge-transfer
complex (CTC); and (4) photoejection of an electron from
In the photostimulated reaction of 1-iodoadamantane
-
-
the excited Nu . Depending on the nature of the RX, the
with PhS ions in acetonitrile, the mechanism of photo-
-
-
Nu , and the experimental conditions, any of these
initiation involves excitation of PhS ions with concomi-
mechanisms could probably be the initiation step.
The proposal that initiation occurs by photoexcitation
of a CTC formed between the Nu- and the substrate is
reinforced by studies of the wavelength dependence of
the quantum yield. This type of initiation has been
proposed for the reaction of acetone enolate anions with
PhI and PhBr in DMSO,9 whereas when potassium
diethyl phosphite is used as a nucleophile, homolysis of
PhI and PET within the CTC is competitive.9 Further-
more, the CTC initiation has been postulated in the
reaction of nitrile carbanions with haloarenes such as
tant photoejection of electrons to the solvent, with a
quantum yield for photoejection of 0.43-0.75 at λ ) 308
20
nm. The reaction does not follow a chain mechanism.
Varying the experimental conditions, we can change
the reactivity of the pair substrate-nucleophile from an
unreactive system to a reactive one. For instance, PhI
did not react under irradiation (Pyrex-filtered flask) with
2
1
acetophenone enolate anion in liquid ammonia, but it
,10
22
does react in DMSO. However, a reaction was observed
in liquid ammonia when irradiation was conducted in an
immersion well.23
2
-bromonaphthalene or p-bromobiphenyl in liquid am-
The photoinduced initiation reaction may have a low
quantum yield, because of a fast backward ET which
annihilates the ion pair before cage separation occurs.
This will result in a poorly efficient source of radicals.
The measured quantum yield depends on the efficiency
of both initiation and turnover in the propagation steps.
The magnitude of the chain length of any SRN1 process
can easily be derived from a comparison of the quantum
yield of the initiation step and an overall reaction
quantum yield. It would therefore be possible to obtain
quantum yields for the initiation step, provided that the
propagation process is eliminated or reduced significantly
in comparison with the initiation step.
monia. The quantum yields of these reactions (λ > 313
nm) range from 7 to 31.11 Formation of a CTC has also
been proposed in the reaction of ethyl phenyl sulfide with
diethyl phosphite ions.12
The quantum yields for the SRN1 substitution reactions
of p-nitrocumyl chloride with quinuclidine (3.5) and azide
ions (6000) have been determined.13 Furthermore, by
studying the wavelength dependence on the quantum
yields, evidence has been obtained that the photochemical
initiation proceeds by means of a CTC.
Acceleration of the substitution reaction of function-
alized aryl bromides with potassium diethyl phosphite
(
(
7) Nazareno, M. A.; Rossi, R. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 5185.
8) (a) Galli, C.; Bunnett, J . F. J . Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 3041. (b)
(14) Beugelmans, R.; Chbani, M. New J . Chem. 1994, 18, 949.
(15) Boumekouez, A.; About-J audet, E.; Collignon, N.; Savignac, P.
J . Organomet. Chem. 1992, 440, 297.
(16) Tolbert, L. M.; Siddiqui, S. J . Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 1744.
(17) Ivanov, V. L.; Eggert, L.; Kuzmin, M. G. High Energy Chem.
1987, 21, 284; Chem. Abstr. 1988, 109, 169594b.
(18) Ivanov, V. L.; Aurich, J .; Eggert, L.; Kuzmin, M. G. J . Photo-
chem. Photobiol., A 1989, 50, 275.
Galli, C.; Gentili, P. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1993, 1135. (c)
van Leeuwen, M.; McKillop, A. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1993,
433. (d) Nazareno, M. A.; Rossi, R. A. J . Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 1645.
e) Murgu ´ı a, M. C.; Rossi, R. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 1355. (f)
Baumgartner, M. T.; Gallego, M. H.; Pierini, A. B. J . Org. Chem. 1998,
2
(
6
3, 6394.
(
9) Fox, M. A.; Younathan, J .; Fryxell, G. E. J . Org. Chem. 1983,
(19) Savvina, V. S.; Ivanov, V. L. High Energy Chem. 1990, 24, 205.
(20) Ahbala, M.; Hapiot, P.; Houmam, A.; J ouini, M.; Pinson, J .;
Sav e´ ant, J .-M. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 11488.
(21) Bunnett, J . F.; Sundberg, J . E. J . Org. Chem. 1976, 41, 1702.
(22) Borosky, G. L.; Pierini, A. B.; Rossi, R. A. J . Org. Chem. 1992,
57, 247.
4
8, 3109.
(
(
10) Hoz, S.; Bunnett, J . F. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 4690.
11) Wu, B.; Zeng, F.; Ge, M.; Cheng, X.; Wu, G. Sci. China, Ser. B
1
991, 34, 777; Chem. Abstr. 1992, 116, 58463h.
(
12) Cheng, C.; Stock, L. M. J . Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 2436.
(
13) Wade, P. A.; Morrison, H. A.; Kornblum, N. J . Org. Chem. 1987,
(23) Semmelhack, M. F.; Bargar, T. M. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102,
7765.
5
2, 3102.