sensitivity of the bromide at elevated temperatures. Eventu-
ally we determined that the cross-coupling reaction pro-
did not adversely affect the yield or enantioselectivity of the
reduction, i.e., 13a and 13d were isolated in 81% and 84%
1
6
gressed well when using aqueous NaHCO
PPh in DME at 50 °C to give yields of the 3-arylindenones
in the 40-70% range.
Attempts to prepare 3-arylindenones with electron-
withdrawing groups (Cl, Br, NO ) at the C(5)- or C(6)-
3
with Pd
2
(dba)
3
/
yields, respectively.
3
Realizing that an asymmetric conjugate reduction of
indenone 4 was a viable reaction pathway, we wanted to
determine the potential for rearrangement of (S)-5 when
subjected to the yeast reduction conditions. We reasoned that
if a fast 1,3-hydrogen rearrangement occurred under these
conditions, then only very low levels of (S)-5 would be
observed during the course of the reaction. On the other hand,
if indenol (S)-5 was stable to the yeast reaction conditions,
then a conjugate hydride addition of the indenone system
was most likely the operative mechanism.
To this end, the indenol (S)-5 (94% ee) was subjected to
the yeast reduction conditions at 40 °C. After 24 h, the
indanone (S)-6 was not observed by HPLC or TLC. In
addition, (S)-5 was completely recovered and the enantio-
meric purity of (S)-5 remained unchanged. In our subsequent
experiment, racemic 5 was added to the yeast reduction of
indenone 4 (5% added relative to 4). After 20 h, complete
consumption of 4 was achieved and the indanone (S)-6
12,13
2
position of the 3-bromoindenone using the Suzuki method-
ology failed to give appreciable amounts of the desired
product. In the examples investigated, the base and thermal
instability of the bromide and indenone product appeared to
be responsible for the poor results. Similar results were
observed when attempting to couple 2-furanboronic acid and
2-thiopheneboronic acid with bromides 7 and 8. Conse-
quently, the remaining indenone substrates 12a,b were
prepared using a previously reported procedure developed
in our laboratories.8
The enantioselective conjugate reduction of 3-aryl-inden-
1
-ones using bakers’ yeast appears to be a general transfor-
14
mation for this class of compounds (Scheme 5). Using our
Scheme 5
(12) General Procedure for the Preparation of 3-Arylinden-1-ones
10a-e): To a thoroughly degassed round-bottomed flask charged with
(
DME (8.5 mL) were added triphenylphosphine (0.05 g, 0.189 mmol) and
tris(dibenzylideneacetone)dipalladium (0.04 g, 0.042 mmol), and the
resulting yellow solution was stirred under nitrogen for 1.5 h at room
temperature. To this solution were added the â-bromoindenone (1.0 g, 4.2
mmol), aryl pinacol borate ester (4.6 mmol, 1.1 equiv), and a saturated
NaHCO3 solution (2.6 mL), and the mixture was heated to 50 °C for 1 h.
The reaction mixture was then cooled to 25 °C, diluted with H2O (25 mL),
and extracted with CH2Cl2 (50 mL). The organic layer was washed with a
saturated NaCl solution (25 mL), dried (MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated
under reduced pressure to furnish 10a-e after flash chromatography (SiO2,
1
:9 EtOAc/hexane).
1
(13) Data for 10d: mp 77-79 °C; H NMR (CDCl3) δ 7.46-7.25 (5
H, m), 6.88 (1H, d, J ) 2.2 Hz), 6.65 (1H, dd, J ) 2.2, 8.0 Hz), 5.96 (1H,
s), 3.82 (3H, s), 2.41 (3H, s); 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 195.72, 163.88,
1
1
60.78, 146.64, 138.70, 132.99, 131.10, 128.80, 127.93, 125.13, 124.54,
24.47, 124.39, 111.22, 110.23, 55.72, 21.43. Anal. Calcd for C17H14O2:
C, 81.58; H, 5.64. Found: C, 81.57; H, 5.63.
14) General Procedure for the Preparation of 3-Arylindan-1-ones
(
Using Bakers’ Yeast (13a-g): To a 250 mL round-bottomed flask charged
with an aqueous phosphate buffer solution (70 mL, pH 7.2) warmed to 40
°C were added bakers’ yeast (6.43 g) and R-D-glucose (5.14 g, 28.5 mmol).
The 3-arylinden-1-one (1.0 g) was then dissolved in a minimum amount of
hot EtOH (4-6 mL) and added to the reaction mixture. The reaction was
stirred for 24 h, and a neutral pH was maintained through the addition of
1 mL aliquots of 1 M NaOH (10-15 mL). After 24 h, the reaction mixture
was cooled to room temperature, EtOH (100 mL) added, the mixture filtered
through Celite to remove the yeast, and the filtrate extracted with 2:1 EtOAc/
acetone (4 × 150 mL). The organic layer was washed with H2O (200 mL)
and a saturated NaCl solution (200 mL), dried (MgSO4), filtered, and
concentrated under reduced pressure to furnish 13a-g after flash chroma-
tography (SiO2, 1:9 EtOAc/hexane).
standard conditions, all of our substrates gave high enanti-
oselectivities (>99.0% ee) and good to excellent yields (50-
8
4%) for the indanone products (13a-g).15 Interestingly,
changing the placement of the electron-donating groups on
either aryl ring had little effect on the reaction outcome. For
example, a significant electronic influence on enantioselec-
tivity has been observed in numerous bakers’ yeast reductions
of prochiral substrates;1 however, placement of a methoxy
group at the C(5)- or C(6)-position did not change the
stereoselectivity (13f, 13g), nor did changing the substituents
on the C(3)-phenyl ring.
(
15) The enantiomeric purity of 13a-g was determined on a Chiralpak
OD column, 9:1 hexane/IPA, 1 mL/min, 230 nm.
16) Data for 13c: mp 115-116 °C; [R]D) -14.4°(c ) 0.500, CHCl3);
H NMR (CDCl3) δ 7.73 (1H, d, J ) 7.8 Hz), 7.17 (1H, d, J ) 7.6 Hz),
.05 (1H, d, J ) 7.6 Hz), 6.92 (3H, m), 6.65 (1H, d, J ) 1.8 Hz), 4.45
1H, dd, J ) 3.7, 8.0 Hz), 3.77 (3H, s), 3.17 (1H, dd, J ) 8.0, 19.0 Hz),
(
,6
1
7
(
2.64 (1H, dd, J ) 3.8, 19.0 Hz), 2.30 (3H, s); 13C NMR (CDCl ) δ 204.06,
3
1
1
65.59, 160.97, 143.64, 138.57, 130.23, 128.77, 128.29, 127.71, 125.04,
24.69, 115.93, 109.84, 55.63, 47.10, 44.42, 21.39. Anal. Cald for
A steric influence at the C(3)-position of the indenone
substrate was also not observed. For example, a methoxy
group in the ortho or meta positions of the C(3)-phenyl ring
C17H16O2: C, 80.93; H, 6.39. Found: C, 80.66; H, 6.42. Data for 13g:
1
mp 91-93 °C; [R]D ) -26.7°(c ) 0.375, CHCl3); H NMR (CDCl3) δ
7
.72 (1 H, d, J ) 8.5 Hz), 7.03 (2 H, d, J ) 8.7 Hz), 6.92 (1 H, d, J ) 8.5
Hz), 6.83 (2 H, d, J ) 8.7 Hz), 6.63 (1 H, s), 4.44 (1 H, dd, J ) 3.7, 8.0
Hz), 3.78 (3 H, s), 3.77 (3 H, s), 3.17 (1 H, dd, J ) 8.1, 19.0 Hz), 2.61 (1
H, dd, J ) 3.7, 19.0 Hz); C NMR (CDCl3) δ 204.06, 165.58, 161.18,
158.58, 135.74, 130.17, 128.57, 124.99, 115.91, 114.30, 109.72, 55.60,
55.26, 47.23, 43.69. Anal. Cald for C17H16O3: C, 76.1; H, 6.01. Found:
C, 75.83; H, 6.19.
13
(
10) The pinacol boronate esters were prepared according to the procedure
described by Tour: Lamba, J. J. S.; Tour, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994,
16, 11723.
11) Heffner, R. J.; Joullie, M. M. Synth. Commun. 1991, 21, 2231.
1
(
Org. Lett., Vol. 1, No. 11, 1999
1841