Chemistry Letters 2002
179
domain of micelles, the enhancement of the reaction rate and
shorter reaction time were noticed. Increasing amount of water in
micelles decreases the concentration of reactants in the core of
micelles, which results in the lowering of the values of rate
constant. The effect of concentration on the reaction kinetics was
also studied in micelles and aqueous buffer solution; in both the
systems the rate constant increased with increasing the concen-
tration of catalyst and substrate proportionately (Figure 2) which
further proves that the compartmentalization of the water-soluble
reactants in the aqueous domain of micelles is indeed the reason
for acceleration of the reaction in micelles. A comparison of the
rate constants was made in AOT/SC ethane (40.2 MPa) and AOT/
isooctane micelles at 310 K for W0 ¼ 1. The rate constant was
found 1.3 times higher in AOT/SC ethane micelles attributed to
the higher diffusivities of the reactants in SC ethane phase. The
hydrolysis of acetylsalicylic acid using the imidazole catalysis is a
generally acid and base catalyzed reaction with the generation of
hydroxide ions followed by the transfer of proton from protonated
imidazole in the transition state.10 The effect of pressure on the
hydrolysis of acetylsalicylic acid in AOT/SC ethane micelles has
also been investigated (Figure 3). Increasing the pressure of
ethane has no influence on the kinetics of the reaction, which is
contrary to the pressure dependence observed in normal AOT/
octane micelles for enzyme catalysed hydrolysis reactions
1
1
attributed to the stability of the enzyme in structurally ordered
micelles at higher pressures of octane. In contrast to the large
sized enzyme molecules which are in contact to the micellar
interface most efficiently, the samller sized imidazole molecule
located inside the core of micelles, where it does not experience
any change thus rendering nopressure dependence on the reaction
rate at high pressures of the system. Pressure dependence has also
1
2;13
been observed for the reactions carried out in carbon dioxide
in the near-critical region. The maximum reaction yield obtained
in the near-critical region has been attributed to the increased
solubility and diffusivity of reactants in this region. In the present
reaction, the supercritical state of ethane continuous phase of
micelles has been maintained throughout the reaction. Also, the
system containing catalyst imidazole and acetylsalicylic acid
existed in a single homogeneous solution, as confirmed by
looking across the windows of high pressure UV cell, at all the
pressures therefore, the solubility and diffusivity of the solutes
have not contributed to the kinetics of the reaction and thus no
pressure dependence of the reaction was noticed.
In this work, we demonstrated that in supercritical fluid
micelles a greater enhancement of catalytic activity was noticed
as compared to aqueous buffer medium. The enhancement of the
reaction rate in micelles and the influence of water content have
been confirmed to be attributed to compartmentalization of the
water-soluble imidazole and acetylsalicylic acid in aqueous core
of micelles. No influence of increasing pressure of supercritical
ethane was observed on the kinetics of the reaction, and reaction
can be carried out efficiently in lower pressure region of ethane.
References
1
P. L. Luisi and B. E. Straub, in ‘‘Reverse Micelles; Biological
and Technological Relevance of Amphiphilic Structures in
Apolar Media,’’ Plenum, New York (1984).
Figure 2. Rate constant vs fold increase in
concentration of imidozole and acetylsalicylic
acid in micelles (W0 ¼ 1, P ¼ 35:6 MPa, T ¼
2
3
P. Kumar and K. L. Mittal, in ‘‘Handbook of Microemulsion
Science and Technology,’’ Marcel Dekker, New York (1999).
T. K. De and A. N. Maitra, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 59, 95
3
10 K) and in aqueous buffer at 310 K. One fold of
ꢄ2
imidazole and acetylsalicylic acid is 2:5 ꢃ 10
(
1995).
ꢄ4
and 2:5 ꢃ 10 M, respectively.
4
5
K. Holmberg, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 51, 137(1994).
D. Kaneko, H. Shouji, T. Kawai, and K. Kon-No, Langmuir,
1
6, 4086 (2000).
6
7
T. Klein and J. M. Prausnitz, J. Phys. Chem., 94, 8811 (1990).
R. W. Gale, J. L. Fulton, and R. D. Smith, Anal. Chem., 59,
1
977 (1987).
R. W. Gale, J. L. Fulton, and R. D. Smith, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
09, 920 (1987).
8
1
9
1
H. Tiltscher and H. Hofman, Chem. Eng. Sci., 42, 959 (1987).
0 R. T. Morrison and R. N. Boyd, in ‘‘Organic Chemistry,’’
Allyn and Bacon, Inc., New Delhi (1988).
1
1 R. V. Rariy, N. Bec, J. L. Saldana, S. N. Nametkin, V. V.
Mozhaev, N. L. Klyachko, A. V. Levashov, and C. Balny,
FEBS Lett. 364, 98 (1995).
Figure 3. Pressure dependence of the rate con-
stant of hydrolysis of acetylsalicylic acid in AOT/
SC ethane micelles at 310 K.
12 H. Kawanami and Y. Ikushima, Chem. Commun., 2000, 2089.
13 F. Shin-ichiro, B. M. Bhanage, Y. Ikushima, and M. Arai,
Green Chem., 3, 87(2001).