50
C.J. Nunes et al. / Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry 149 (2015) 49–58
Taking into account that copper ions in the active site of tyrosinase
2.2.3. Complex [Cu(N22)(H20)(CF3SO3)](CF3SO3) 1
could be responsible for both activities, formation of melanin and, pos-
sibly, stimulation of melanoma growth, a study to verify the influence of
tyrosinase mimics on the viability of melanoma cells was carried out.
The aim was to establish possible correlations between an observed
stimulation or inhibition in melanoma cells growth, and the structure
of some copper(II) complexes. Two new structurally related dinuclear
complexes, one with a polydentate dinucleating amine–imine ligand,
and the other with a tridentate imine and a diamine-bridging ligand,
were then prepared and investigated (complexes 2 and 4, shown in
Fig. 1). The corresponding mononuclear copper(II) species (complexes
1 and 3, respectively) were also isolated, and used in comparative stud-
ies. These complexes showed to be thermodynamically stable through
CD measurements, using HSA as copper competitive ligand. Additional-
ly, oxidative damage to DNA caused by these complexes, in the presence
of hydrogen peroxide, was verified in complementary studies.
Copper complex [Cu(N22)](CF3SO3)2 1 was prepared in good yields
(75%) by complexation of 1 eq. of copper(II) triflate with 1 eq. of N-
benzyl-N-bis(2-pyridylethyl)amine in methanol [10]. Calc. for C2 H23
N F S2O6Cu (FW = 679.11 g/mol): C, 40.68; H, 3.41; N, 6.19; Cu,
9.36%; Experim. values: C, 41.09; H, 3.14; N, 6.25; Cu, 9.22%. UV–vis
bands, λmax, nm (ε, 103 M−1 cm−1): 261 (13.5), 268 s (10.6), 684
(0.142).
2.2.4. Complex [Cu2(N22-22)(H2O)2(CF3SO3)2](CF3SO3)2 2
This complex was prepared according to a procedure previously de-
veloped [11,12]. To a methanolic solution (10 ml) of copper(II) triflate
(558 mg, 1.54 mmol), 487 mg (0.77 mmol) of the ligand N22-22 dis-
solved in 10 ml methanol was added, under stirring. The blue solution
obtained was maintained under stirring for 2 h, and after the addition
of some diethyl ether a precipitate was formed. The suspension was
filtrated, the precipitate washed with 50 mL ether, and after dried
gave 622 mg of a blue powder (64% yield). After a slow evaporation of
a methanolic solution of this compound, blue crystals suitable for crys-
tallographic analysis were isolated. Calc. for C44H44Cu2F6N6O6S2
(FW = 1392.22 g/mol): C, 40.68; H, 3.41; N, 6.19; Cu, 9.36%; Experim.
values: C, 41.25; H, 3.18; N, 6.23; Cu, 8.96%. ESI-MS m/z = 528.1, calcu-
lated for C44H44Cu2F6N6O6S2 = 528.07. UV–vis bands, λmax, nm (ε,
103 M−1 cm−1): 261 (45.7), 268 s (37.2), 684 (0.275).
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials
Most of the reagents (percent purity) used: 2-(acetyl)pyridine
(99%), 2,3-bis(pyridyl)pyrazine, histamine hydrochloride (99%),
isatin (98%), 2-(2-aminoethyl)pyridine (95%), copper(II) perchlorate
hexahydrated (98%) and copper(II) triflate (98%) were purchased from
Aldrich Chemical Co. Solvents ethanol (96%), ethanol absolute (99%),
methanol (99%), dichloromethane (99%) and acetone (99%), as well as
hydrochloric acid were from Merck Chemical Co. DNA sodium salt from
calf thymus (CT-DNA) and human serum albumin (HSA) were from
Sigma-Aldrich. All the solutions were prepared with deionized water
from a Millipore instrument.
2.2.5. Crystal structure determination and refinement
Crystal data for the complex [Cu2(N22-22)(H2O)2(CF3SO3)2]
(CF3SO3)2 2 together with the details of X-ray diffraction experiments
are reported in Tables 1 to 3. Measurements were made on a Bruker–
Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer with graphite monochromatized
Mo(Kα) radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å). The structures were solved by di-
rect methods and refinements, based on F2, made by full-matrix least-
squares techniques. The H atoms for the water molecule were placed
at idealized positions in order to optimize the H-bonds with the oxygen
atoms of the closest triflate counter-ions. The CIF file with data for
complex 2 has been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data
Centre, CCDC 1030475.
2.2. Syntheses of the ligands and corresponding complexes
2.2.1. Ligand 2,2′-bis(aminomethyl)diphenyl
2,2′-Bis(aminomethyl)biphenyl (dpam) was prepared in 2 steps by
a Gabriel's reaction from 2,2′-bis(bromomethyl)biphenyl [7] according
to a described procedure [8]. N-benzyl-N-bis(2-pyridylethyl)amine
(N22) was prepared by addition of benzylamine to an excess of 2-
vinylpyridine, according to a procedure reported in the literature [9].
2.2.6. Complex [Cu(apyhist)H2O](ClO4)2 3
The imine ligand apyhist, where apyhist = ligand obtained from
2-(acetyl)pyridine and histamine (see Fig. 1), was prepared according
to methods already described in previous works [13,14], through con-
densation reaction of suitable carbonyl and amine precursors, followed
by immediate in situ metallation. The formed imine copper(II) complex
2.2.2.
N2,N2,N2′,N2′-tetrakis[2-(2-pyridyl)ethyl][1-1′-biphenyl]-2,2′-
dimethylamine (N22-N22)
Table 1
To a solution of 2,2′-bis(aminomethyl)diphenyl (1.05 g, 5 mmol) in
anhydrous methanol (30 mL) maintained under argon, freshly distilled
2-vinylpyridine (6.42 g, 61 mmol) and glacial acetic acid (0.35 g,
5.8 mmol) were carefully added. After a 5-day reflux under argon, the
mixture was then extracted in dichloromethane, and washed with
NaOH (1 M, pH ≈ 12). Organic layers were dried over sodium sulfate,
filtered and evaporated under vacuum. The resulting yellow oil was
chromatographied on silica gel with CH2Cl2/MeOH (95/5) and finally
with CH2Cl2/MeOH/NH3 (90/10/1). Ligand N22-N22 was obtained as
pale yellow oil (1.3 g, 41%). MS (FAB+) [MS = mass spectrometry,
FAB = fast atomic bombardment]: m/z = 633,3692 [M + 1] (100);
C42H44N6 FW = 632.84 g/mol. 1H RMN (300 MHz, CDCl3) in δ (ppm):
8.46 (dd, J = 0.8Hz, J = 4.1Hz, 4H); 7.50 (dt, J = 1.7Hz, J = 7.7Hz,
4H); 7.32 (m, 2H); 7.19 (dd, J = 3.8Hz, J = 5.2Hz, 4H); 7.06 (dd, J =
4.9Hz, J = 7.5Hz, 4H); 6.99 (m, 6H); 3.38 (s, 4H); 2,78 (s, 8H). 13C
RMN (50 MHz, CDCl3) in δ (ppm): 160.46 (4C Py, where Py = pyridine);
148.84 (4CH Py); 140.51 (2C Ph); 137.34 (2C Ph); 135.93 (4CH Py);
129.40 (2CH Ph); 128.61 (2CH Ph); 126.98 (2CH Ph); 125.96 (2CH
Ph); 123.21 (4CH Py); 1120.81 (4CH Py); 55.49 (2CH2-Ph); 53.59
(4CH2-Py); 35.58 (4CH2-N).
Crystallographic data for complex [Cu2(N22-22)(H2O)2(CF3SO3)2](CF3SO3)2 2.
[CuII2(N22-22)(CF3SO3)4/3(H2O)8/3
]
Formula
Molecular weight
Crystal system
Space group
Z
C147H172Cu6F36N18O50S12
4440.99
Triclinic
P-1
2
a (Å)
b (Å)
c (Å)
α (°)
19.7799 (4)
22.6303 (8)
23.049 (1)
70.399 (4)
78.025 (2)
73.780 (1)
9258.4 (6)
1.593
β (°)
γ (°)
V (Å3)
ρ (g·cm−3
)
N° of measured refl.
N° of observed refl. (F2 N 4σ(F))
R (F2 N 4σ(F))
41,601
19,558
0.0806
wR (all reflections)
Gof
0.2774
0.998
1.022
−1.152
Δρ max (e Å−3
)
Δρ min (e Å−3
)