G Model
BIOMAC-8361; No. of Pages11
ARTICLE IN PRESS
M.P. Heitz, J.W. Rupp / International Journal of Biological Macromolecules xxx (2017) xxx–xxx
6
enzyme-inhibitor (EI) complex, but also to the tyrosinase-l-dopa
ES*) complex to form the enzyme-substrate-inhibitor (ESI*) com-
hydrophobic character of the IL enhances the hydrophobic effect
on the tyrosinase [34,35,38]. Second, the L-B plots for these [Im41+
(
]
plex. We calculated the equilibrium binding constants for each of
these cases. For the (EI) complex, the slopes from each of the L-B
fits were used to make a secondary plot of L-B slope as a function of
IL concentration (see the upper graph, right panel of Fig. 4). These
data were regressed using a linear model to extract the x-intercept,
which directly yields the (EI) equilibrium binding constant (KEI)
ILs (not shown) both indicate mixed type inhibition since the family
of lines intersects in the second quadrant of the graph. Third, simi-
lar to the [Im21+] ILs, the KEI and KEIS values show that binding with
free enzyme is preferred over the ES* complex and KEIS/KEI ratios.
−
Fourth, the [MeSO3 ] binds more tightly to free tyrosinase com-
−
pared to Cl , by roughly a factor of six whereas in the ES* complex
[
8,50]. Similarly, to calculate the (ESI*) equilibrium binding con-
the preferential binding is less than a factor of two.
stant (KESI) the L-B intercepts were plotted as a function of [IL]
concentration (see the lower graph, right panel of Fig. 4). The val-
ues of KEI and KEIS for [Im21+][MeSO3 ] binding were 22 ± 7 and
3.2.3. Inhibition kinetic parameters for tyrosinase activity in
[Im61+] ILs
−
6
2 ± 9 mM, respectively, and are reported in Table 2. We observed
Although we only measured one [Im61+] IL, we can comment on
+
−
+
−
the cation effect by comparing to the [Im41+][Cl ] data. Increasing
the chain length to C6 has the expected effect of lowering the IC50
and decreasing the binding equilibrium constants. It appears that
increasing the imidazolium alkyl chain by only two carbons plays a
substantial role in the ensuing inhibition of tyrosinase, presumably
through increased screening of the hydrophobic effect [34]. While
−
similar behavior for [Im ][NO ] and [Im ][TFMS ] in that for
2
1
3
21
both of these cases, the ILs also displayed mixed inhibition charac-
teristics with KEI and K reported in Table 2. It is noteworthy that
EIS
[
Im21+][NO3 ] has binding equilibrium constants that are at least
−
twice that of the two methanesulfonate-based ILs. Larger values of
K are indicative of weaker inhibitor binding and this observation is
consistent with the relative activity behavior where [Im21+][NO3
−
]
the KEIS/KEI ratios for [Im41+][Cl ] and [Im ][Cl ] are statistically
−
+
−
61
has the least inhibitory effect on tyrosinase at any given IL concen-
tration [49]. Similarly, we can assess the binding affinity preference
of the ILs for either free or substrate-bound enzyme by examining
the KEIS/KEI ratios reported in Table 2. Since each of the KEIS/KEI
ratios are greater than 1 for these three ILs, this indicates that they
have a binding preference for free enzyme over the ES* complex.
But we also point out that the preference for free enzyme weakens
as anion hydrophobicity increases.
identical, the absolute magnitudes of KEI and KEIS are quite different,
by a factor of ∼11. This suggests that when bound, the effect of
+
+
[Im ] and [Im ] on tyrosinase and the ES* complex is likely very
41
61
similar for the two cations, however the difference in the binding
affinities is large with [Im61+] being more strongly bound to both
the free enzyme and the ES* complex.
3.3. Molecular docking simulations
Of particular interest in these experiments is the behavior of
tyrosinase with [Im21+][Tf N ], which is markedly different from
−
To aid experimental work, molecular docking simulations have
been used as a tool to augment the molecular level interpretation
of the data. A number of recent articles that discussed tyrosinase
inhibition [22,52–61] and protein-IL interactions [26,32,60,62–64]
have demonstrated the applicability of including docking simula-
tions in estimating potential sites for ligand binding.
2
all other ILs. Fig. 5 shows the L-B plots for the tyrosinase/L-dopa
kinetics that were measured using three [Im21 ][Tf N ] concentra-
tions. In consideration of the inhibition type, this data suggests that
the L-B regression lines intersect on the 1/V axis and thus is char-
+
−
2
+
acteristic of competitive inhibition. Compared to the other [Im21
]
ILs, here the apparent Km values increase while Vmax remains
effectively constant to within experimental uncertainty (data not
shown). As described above, we calculated the corresponding KI
value for the interactions between this IL and tyrosinase using
the L-B slopes and computed a value of 0.7 mM, see Table 2.
This KI value represents a significant increase in the IL affinity
for tyrosinase, an increase in excess of 30 times greater than
While the experimental kinetic results provides compelling evi-
dence to support mixed inhibition kinetics in all but [Im21+][Tf N ]
−
2
(competitive inhibition) and yield estimates of binding equilibrium
constants for IL binding to free tyrosinase and the ES* complex,
there is at least one other point of consideration that we now
address. Up to this point, we have not probed in any depth potential
sites within tyrosinase where IL ions might bind, either the active
site directly or associations with residues outside of the active site
that contribute to governing the tyrosinase activity. In an effort to
seek a molecular explanation for the observed inhibition behavior
of the ILs used here, we undertook a series of molecular dock-
ing studies using AutoDock4.2 and AutoDock Vina. The calculated
dockings were in general agreement between both programs but
Vina is reported to be more accurate [48] so we report the results
from that data. Docking calculations were performed using L-dopa
as a means of testing the agreement between Vina dockings and the
reported crystal structure for 4P6S [12]. The lowest energy dock-
ing configuration for L-dopa (-6.3 kcal/mol) is in good agreement
with experiment and places the L-dopa in proximity of HIS208,
VAL217, VAL218, ALA221, and the HIS60-bound metal atom. The
amino acids that compose the A-chain tyrosinase binding pocket
for L-dopa are shown in Fig. 6. The importance of free histidine
residues for ligand binding has been discussed and linked to tyrosi-
nase performance [55] and we note that this idea is consistent with
most of the docking sites that resulted from our studies here. Any
of the active site interactions between IL ions and tyrosinase in our
results included the metal-free HIS208 in most cases.
Im21+][MeSO ] and [Im ][TFMS ] and about 60 times greater
− −
+
[
3 21
+
−
+
than [Im21 ][NO3 ]. Comparing all of the [Im21 ] ILs, there is a
clear pattern of binding to tyrosinase that appears to follow the
anion hydrophobicity and polarizability. Of these four anions, rank-
ing by hydrophobicity results in the sequence of these ions as
−
−
−
−
[
NO3 ] < [MeSO3 ] < [TFMS ] < and [Tf N ], thus it was not unan-
2
−
ticipated that [Tf N ] preferred the relative hydrophobicity of the
2
enzyme compared to the phosphate buffer. Moreover, two recent
reviews have discussed the idea that anions are reported to have a
more active role in enzyme activity/stability through greater polar-
izability effects relative to cations [35,51], which is consistent with
our observations in [Im21+] ILs.
3
[
.2.2. Inhibition kinetics for tyrosinase activity in [Im41+] and
Im61+] ILs
The results from all of the kinetic measurements for the [Im41+]
and [Im61+] ILs are also summarized in Table 2. From these data,
we briefly highlight several features for the C and C6 alkyl chain
4
+
imidazolium derivatives. For the two [Im41 ] ILs, their behavior par-
allels that observed for the [Im21+] ILs. Several specific points are
apparent from these data. First, the IC50 data show that the pres-
ence of a longer alkyl chain on the imidazolium cation contributes
significantly to the inhibition of tyrosinase, by a factor of ∼2.5 on
Data for the top nine docking results for each ion used in this
note here that care must be taken to avoid over-interpreting dif-
ferences in docking energies. While it is no doubt customary to
+
−
+
−
going from [Im ][MeSO3 ] to [Im ][MeSO3 ]. The increased
2
1
41