Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
M. C. Varela et al. / Tetrahedron 63 (2007) 3334–3339
3337
Each of these three types of disks was placed in a batch-flow
type reactor, the entire apparatus was dried under vacuum
and flushed with argon to ensure a moisture free environ-
ment. The disks were swollen in THF, cooled to 0 ꢀC fol-
lowed by seeding for 60 min with borane. After this
period, the ketone was slowly added via syringe and the re-
actor agitated for 24 h. The solution was collected, the disks
were washed three times with THF, and the filtrates com-
bined. Although this method gave nearly complete conver-
sion in all cases, only disk 2D gave significant selectivity.
The enantioselectivities obtained from the others were
very low (Table 4).
monitored from 200–400 nm with a 0.2 mL/min flow rate
installed in a system consisting of a Waters 2695 HPLC,
a Waters PDA 996, and a Waters Micromass ZQ detector
for obtaining low-resolution MS (ESI) data at concentrations
of w1 mg/mL. Reduction products were analyzed using an
Astec G-TA b-cyclodextrin trifluoroacetylated 25 m GC chi-
ral column. Elemental analyses were provided by Midwest
and Galbraith Laboratories.
4.1.1. (2S)-1-([2-Trimethylsilyl]ethoxycarbonyl)-2-(me-
thoxycarbonyl)pyrrolidine (5T). A solution of L-proline
methyl ester (2.82 g, 21.8 mmol) in 17 mL of CH3CN was
treated with 8.7 mL of Et3N and cooled to 0 ꢀC. Commer-
cially available 1-[2-(trimethylsilyl)ethoxycarbonyloxy]-
pyrrolidin-2,5-dione (Teoc-OSu) (10.1 g, 40.0 mmol) was
added at 0 ꢀC and the mixture was allowed to warm to rt,
and stirred for 18 h. The solution was then diluted with
Et2O and extracted with water (3ꢂ), 3% HCl, water, 10%
NaHCO3, and satd NaCl, and dried (Na2SO4). The solvent
was removed under reduced pressure to give 5.99 g (99%
crude yield) of 5T as an orange oil. Upon chromatography
this compound co-eluted with unreacted Teoc-Su (1H NMR
br s at d 2.88 ppm) that could not be completely removed
without significant loss of material; thus 5Twas used in sub-
sequent transformations without further purification. NMR
spectroscopy indicated the presence of two rotomers in ap-
Table 4. Reductions using CBS-functionalized disks
Disk
Yield
ee (corr)
2D
3D
2/3D
100
93
95
40 (44)
3 (3)
5 (6)
The low selectivities are clearly attributable to the low load-
ing, perhaps combined with poor diffusion of the reagents
into the disks, thus favoring the uncatalyzed solution-phase
reduction. Numerous attempts were made to circumvent this
problem, e.g., by increasing seeding time; however, all re-
ductions gave similarly poor results. Thus, in contrast to
our successful application of the disk methodology to transi-
tion-metal catalyzed processes,9 it is clear that disks are
a poor option in circumstances where competition from a
solution-phase process interferes.
1
proximately of 52:48 ratio. H NMR d 4.34 and 4.28 (both
dd, J¼3.4, 8.6 Hz, total 1H), 4.20–4.08 (m, 2H), 3.71 and
3.70 (two s, 3H), 3.60–3.38 (m, 2H), 2.26–2.15 (m, 1H),
2.02–1.84 (m, 3H), 1.00 and 0.92 (dd, J¼8.2, 8.6 Hz and
dd, J¼7.0, 10.2 Hz, total 2H), 0.01 and 0.00 (two s, total
9H) ppm. 13C NMR d 175.0 and 174.9, 156.8 and 156.3,
65.1 and 64.9, 60.5 and 60.3, 53.7 and 53.6, 48.2 and 47.8,
32.5 and 31.4, 25.9 and 25.0, 19.34 and 19.31, 0.1 and
0.0 ppm. LRMS calcd for C12H24NO4Si (M+1) 274.14;
found 274.06. Anal. Calcd for C12H23NO4Si: C, 52.72; H,
8.48; N, 5.12. Found: C, 54.54, 54.79; H, 8.73, 8.69; N,
4.75, 5.09.
3. Conclusions
We have completed optimization studies of several versions
of polymer-supported CBS catalysts. The resin derived from
crosslinking monomer 6T is clearly and consistently supe-
rior to the pendant resin derived from 9T, and gives results
comparable to solution-phase model reductions. The physi-
cal and chemical nature of the polymer significantly affects
the outcome of reduction. Attempts to both recycle and re-
generate failed, most likely due to a combination of disas-
sembly of the oxazaborolidine and structural breakdown of
the polymer itself. Polymer disks derived from monoliths
could not be prepared with high loading and showed consis-
tently poor results.
4.1.2. (2S)-2-(N-Methoxy-N-methylcarbamoyl)-1-([2-tri-
methylsilyl]ethoxycarbonyl)pyrrolidine (7T). To a solu-
tion of 5.00 g (19.0 mmol) of 7 in 2.5 mL of CH2Cl2 was
slowly added 47.5 mL of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). After
2 h TLC showed the complete absence of starting material.
After removal of CH2Cl2 and most of the TFA under reduced
pressure, the oily residue was taken up in 1:1 ether/hexane,
filtered, and solvent was again removed under reduced pres-
sure. The deprotected ester was not characterized, but used
immediately for Teoc protection. The crude oil was dis-
solved in 17 mL of CH3CN, 8.7 mL of Et3N was added,
and the solution was cooled to 0 ꢀC. Teoc-OSu (10.1 g,
40.0 mmol) was added at 0 ꢀC and allowed to warm to rt
and stirred for 18 h. After workup as for 5T, above, 5.82 g
of 7T was obtained (99% crude yield) as an orange oil.
NMR indicated the presence of two rotomers in a ca.
70:30 ratio. As in the case of 5T this material was used after
chromatographic separation from most but not all unreacted
Teoc-OSu. 1H NMR d 4.73 (major) and 4.67 (minor) (both br
dd, J¼3.2, 8.4 Hz, total 1H), 4.20–4.07 (m, 2H), 3.78 (ma-
jor) and 3.73 (minor) (both s, total 3H), 3.59 (m, 1H), 3.44
(m, 1H), 3.19 (s, 3H), 2.17 (m, 1H), 2.04 (m, 1H), 1.87
(m, 2H), 1.02 (major) and 0.92 (minor) (both m, total
2H), 0.02 (major) and 0.01 (minor) (both s, total 9H) ppm.
4. Experimental
4.1. General
All reactions were performed in oven-dried glassware unless
otherwise stated under an atmosphere of dry argon. 1H
and 13C spectra were recorded at 400 MHz in CDCl3. IR
spectra of liquids and solids were recorded neat using a
FTIR. Detailed preparations of 5–11 are described else-
where.5 Optical purities of chiral auxiliaries and their pre-
cursors were determined using a Daicel Chiralcel OD-RH
0.46 cm by 15 cm (I.D. by length) 5.0 mm column employ-
ing a gradient elution of 0–5 min: 100% A, 5–25 min:
0–100% B, 25–30 min: 100–0% B, 30–35 min: 100% A
(solvent A: H2O/0.1% TFA; B: Acetonitrile/0.1% TFA)