Original Papers 63
3
.58, s) and acetal carbon (δ 113.1, C‑19) indicated that the me-
C
Fig. 1 Structures of
compounds 1–6 from
the fruits of Momordica
charantia.
thoxy group was located at C‑19. The structure of the sugar moi-
ety was determined by H‑ H COSY (H‑1′/H‑2′; H‑3′/H‑4′/H ‑6′)
1
1
2
and HMBC (H‑2′/C‑3; H‑4′/C‑3) correlations and further con-
firmed to be D‑ribo‑hexos‑3‑ulose (3‑keto‑Glu) by comparison
of the NMR data with the reported literature [22]. The D-form
was determined by specific rotation value of its sugar from acid
hydrolysis of compound 1 [23]. According to the coupling con-
stant (J = 7.6, H‑1′), the configuration of the sugar moiety was de-
termined as β‑D‑3‑keto‑glucose. Furthermore, the HMBC spec-
trum showed a long‑range correlation between H‑1′ and C‑3,
suggesting that the sugar moiety was attached at C‑3 in 1. The
1
planar structure of 1 was fully established and assigned by H-
1
H COSY, HMQC, and HMBC experiments. The stereochemistry
"
of 1 was determined by NOESY correlations (l Fig. 3), indicating
that H‑3, H‑10, H‑17, Me‑21, Me‑28 and Me‑30 had α‑orienta-
tion, while H‑8 and Me‑18 had β. The NOESY correlation between
H‑19 and H‑8 unambiguously evidenced that acetal carbon
(
C‑19) should have S conformation. On the basis of the above
observation, compound 1 was undoubtedly established to be
9S‑methoxy‑5β,19‑epoxycucurbita‑6,23‑dien-3β,25(E)‑diol 3-
1
O‑β‑D‑3‑ketoglycopyranoside and was named taikuguasin A.
The positive‑ion HRESIMS of taikuguasin B (2) displayed a quasi-
+
molecular ion at m/z 685.4304 ([M + Na] , calcd. 685.4294), indi-
cating a molecular formula of C38H62O . The IR spectrum re-
9
−
1
vealed the presence of hydroxyl (3408 cm ) and olefinic
1463 cm ) moieties. The 1D and 2D NMR spectroscopic data
l Tables 1 and 2; l Fig. 2) revealed that the aglycone of com-
−
1
(
(
"
"
pound 2 possessed a 5,19‑epoxycucurbitane triterpene structure,
similar to that of compound 1, except for the presence of an
ethoxy group (δC 65.9, C‑1′′; 15.6, C‑2′′) at C‑19 (δC 111.1) in 2,
rather than a methoxy group in 1. This was confirmed through
1
1
screening assay showed that the 70% EtOH fraction could inhibit
LPS‑induced NO production (IC50 = 16.5 µg/mL) and was cytotoxic
against human tumor cell lines (IC50 = ca. 30.0 µg/mL). Therefore,
the active fraction was further fractionated by sequential chro-
matography methods, by using silica gel column, solid‑phase ex-
traction (SPE) column, and reverse phase HPLC, to afford six
H‑ H COSY correlation of H ‑1′′ [δ 3.53 (m); 3.95 (m)]/Me‑2′′
2 H
[δH 1.10 (t, J = 7.2 Hz)] and HMBC correlations of H‑19 (δH 4.98)/
C‑1′′. The sugar moiety of compound 2 was determined to be a
D‑alloside on the basis of the C NMR data and comparison with
the reported literature of the sugar in acid hydrolysis [24]. The
relative configuration of 2 was determined by NOESY experiment
1
3
"
5
β,19‑epoxy cucurbitane‑type triterpenes, compounds 1–6
(l Fig. 3) and comparison with the published NMR spectroscopic
"
(
l Fig. 1).
data of cucurbitane‑type triterpenoids. The NOESY spectrum
showed correlations of Me‑18/H‑8, H‑20, which required that
H‑8, Me‑18, and H‑20 had β‑orientation, while H‑10, Me‑28,
and Me‑30 were α‑oriented due to the correlations of Me‑28/
H‑3, H‑10, and Me‑30/H‑10, H‑17. The configuration of C‑19
was determined as R based on the lack of correlations between
H‑19/H‑8 in NOESY spectrum of 2. Hence, the structure of com-
pound 2 was established as 19R‑ethoxy‑5β,19‑epoxycucurbita-
6,23‑dien‑3β,25(E)‑diol 3‑O‑β‑D‑allopyranoside, and the com-
pound was named taikuguasin B.
Compound 1 was isolated as a white amorphous powder, having
a molecular formula of C37
tion ESIMS data ([M + Na] m/z 669.4006). The IR spectrum
H
O calculated from the high‑resolu-
58
+
9
−
1
showed absorption bands at 3385, 1733, and 1447 cm , indicat-
ing hydroxyl, ketone, and olefinic functional groups, respectively.
1
"
The H NMR spectrum (l Table 1) of compound 1 revealed the
presence of six tertiary methyls (δH 0.80, 0.83, 0.89, and 1.53 × 3,
Me‑18, Me‑30, Me‑28, Me‑26, Me‑27, Me‑29), one secondary
methyl [δH 0.93 (br d, J = 4.4 Hz, Me‑21)], one methoxy [δH 3.58
(
s)], one acetal proton [δH 4.65 (s, H‑19)], and four olefinic pro-
tons [δH 6.30 (br d, J = 9.6 Hz, H‑6), 5.48 (dd, J = 9.6, 3.2 Hz, H‑7),
.89 (m, H‑24), and 5.93 (m, H‑23)], as well as a sugar moiety in-
Compound 3 was isolated as a white amorphous powder, pos-
sessing a molecular formula of C37H60O9 (m/z 671.4142, [M +
+
5
Na] ), calculated from the high‑resolution ESIMS data. The IR
−1
cluding one anomeric proton [δ 4.88 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, H‑1′)] and five
oxygenated protons [δH 4.98 (m, H‑4′), 4.68 (br d, J = 7.6 Hz, H‑2′),
4
(
spectrum displayed absorption bands of hydroxyl (3403 cm )
H
−
1
1
13
and olefinic (1447 cm ) functional groups. The H and C NMR
"
.55 (br d, J = 11.6 Hz, H‑6′), 4.46 (br d, J = 11.6, 4.8 Hz, H‑6′), 3.84
spectroscopic data (l Tables 1 and 2) showed that compound 3
m)]. The 13C NMR and DEPT spectra (l Table 2) clearly showed
"
possesses six singlet methyls [δC 15.0 (C‑18); 18.2 (C‑26); 25.8
(C‑27); 24.4 (C‑28); 21.0 (C‑29); 20.1 (C‑30)], one doublet methyl
[δH 1.17 (d, J = 6.0 Hz); δC 19.3 (C‑21)], one methoxy group [δH
3.32; δC 57.2 (C‑1′′)], one trisubstituted olefin [δH 5.62 (br d,
3
7 carbon signals, including eight methyls, eight methylenes,
fourteen methines, and seven quaternary carbons. These spectro-
scopic data, together with the reported constituents from
M. charantia [12,18–21] suggested that compound 1 was a
J = 9.0 Hz, H‑24); δ 129.0 (C‑24); 132.3 (C‑25)], a cis double band
C
5
β,19‑epoxycucurbitane triterpene with a sugar moiety and a
[δH 6.19 (dd, J = 9.6, 1.8 Hz, H‑6); 5.51 (dd, J = 9.6, 3.6 Hz, H‑7); δC
133.5 (C‑6); 130.5 (C‑7)], six methines (including two oxymeth-
"
methoxy group. HMBC correlations (l Fig. 2) between OMe (δ
H
Liaw C-C et al. 5β,19-Epoxycucurbitane Triterpenoids from… Planta Med 2015; 81: 62–70