complexes to identify the site of conjugation. Several mass
spectrometric strategies have been developed to aid in the
identification of cross-linked peptides, with much work devoted
to the design and synthesis of novel cross-linkers. Some methods
have focused on distinguishing conjugated peptides from unmodi-
fied ones by incorporating affinity tags into the linkers to enrich
the same phosphate chromophore and thus would efficiently
dissociate upon IR irradiation.
2
8
In this work, ultraviolet photodissociation at 355 nm in a
quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer is used to selectively
photodissociate only the chromogenic bis-aryl hydrazone conju-
gated peptides. In recent years, UVPD has been utilized as an
29-32
1
4-17
alternative to CID as an ion activation technique for peptides.
the peptides of interest in complex mixtures
or using
Compared to CID, UVPD in ion traps affords several advantages
such as secondary dissociation of primary product ions and a
potential reduction in ion losses due to scattering since photo-
dissociation does not alter ion trajectories. Moreover, as a
nonresonant process, UVPD can be performed at a lower rf
trapping voltage than CID which facilitates the detection of
diagnostic low-mass product ions. Photodissociation methods have
also been used as a screening tool to selectively dissociate specific
chromogenic species, such as phosphorylated peptides using
isotopically labeled cross-linking reagents to pinpoint conjugated
15,18,19
peptide ions in the mass spectra,
introducing a reporter ion
which is observed upon low-energy collision induced dissociation
2
0
(
CID), or utilizing fluorogenic cross-linkers to differentiate
between conjugated and unmodified peptides during a front-end
2
1-23
LC separation.
Other groups have aimed at simplifying
interpretation of the product ion spectra of intermolecularly cross-
linked peptides by incorporating gas-phase labile bonds which can
be cleaved upon low-energy CID, thus yielding two modified
peptides that can then be individually sequenced by a second stage
28,33,34
35
IRMPD at 10.6 µm,
containing peptides at 220 and 262 nm.
disulfide bonds at 157 nm, and tyrosyl-
3
6,37
In our work, UVPD is
1
4,24-26
of CID.
used to screen the chromogenic BAH-conjugated peptides in
complex mixtures, as demonstrated for a mixture of peptides,
using both direct infusion ESI-MS and online LC-UVPD-MS
techniques. Upon UV irradiation at 355 nm, only the BAH-
conjugated peptides are shown to undergo photodissociation. In
contrast, the nonconjugated aldehyde- and hydrazine-modified
peptides or other non-BAH peptides do not absorb at 355 nm and
thus do not photodissociate, offering a high degree of selectivity
for the rapid identification of the conjugated peptides of interest.
Each of these techniques, however, only focuses on one of
the two challenges mentioned above: either distinguishing cross-
linked peptides from uninformative ones in mixtures or sequenc-
ing the cross-linked peptides of interest. We previously reported
an IR chromogenic cross-linker which contained a phosphate
chromophore that promoted the selective infrared multiphoton
dissociation (IRMPD) of cross-linked peptides for differentiation
27
of cross-linked peptides from unmodified ones. IRMPD of these
cross-linked peptides also yielded a series of y-type fragment ions
C-terminal to the cross-linked lysine residues which allowed the
two constituent peptides to be sequenced without the need for
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
n
Chemicals and Reagents. The peptides Ac-RFMWMK-NH
2
,
MS methods. However, this technique, as well as those
R-MSH (Ac-SYSMEHFRWGKPV-NH ), neurotensin (Pyr-
2
described above, suffered in distinguishing between cross-
linked peptides of interest and dead-end modified peptides
LYENKPRRPYIL), and substance P were purchased from
Bachem (Torrance, CA). The peptide angiotensin II was
obtained from AnaSpec (San Jose, CA). The peptides brady-
kinin, YGGFM, and disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS) were
purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). The peptides Ac-
AAAKAAAAR and Ac-AAAKPAAAR were synthesized at the
Protein Microanalysis Facility at the University of Texas at
Austin and purified by reversed-phase HPLC. Benzaldehyde
and 2-hydrazinopyridine were obtained from Aldrich (Milwau-
kee, WI). Succinimidyl 4-hydrazinonicotinate acetone hydra-
zone (SANH) and succinimidyl 4-formylbenzoate (SFB) were
from Pierce Biotechnology (Rockford, IL). All other chemical
and solvents (HPLC grade) were purchased from Fisher
Scientific (Fairlawn, NJ).
(
e.g., peptides that have reacted with the cross-linker but
the other reactive site of the cross-linker has been hydro-
lyzed) which generally are not structurally informative. In
addition, phosphorylated peptides could be initially falsely
classified as IRCX-cross-linked peptides as they also contain
(
(
(
(
(
(
14) Chowdhury, S. M.; Munske, G. R.; Tang, X.; Bruce, J. E. Anal. Chem. 2006,
8, 8183–8193
15) Chu, F.; Mahrus, S.; Craik, C. S.; Burlingame, A. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006,
28, 10362–10363
16) Sinz, A.; Kalkhof, S.; Ihling, C. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2005, 16, 1921–
931
17) Hurst, G. B.; Lankford, T. K.; Kennel, S. J. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2004,
5, 832–839
18) Mueller, D. R.; Schindler, P.; Towbin, H.; Wirth, U.; Voshol, H.; Hoving,
S.; Steinmetz, M. O. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 1927–1934
7
.
1
.
1
.
1
.
.
19) Ihling, C.; Schmidt, A.; Kalkhof, S.; Schulz, D. M.; Stingl, C.; Mechtler, K.;
(28) Crowe, M. C.; Brodbelt, J. S. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 5726–5734
(29) Reilly, J. P. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2009, 28, 425–447
(30) Wilson, J. J.; Brodbelt, J. S. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 7883–7892
(31) Thompson, M. S.; Cui, W.; Reilly, J. P. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2007,
18, 1439–1452
(32) Oh, J. Y.; Moon, J. H.; Lee, Y. H.; Hyung, S.-W.; Lee, S.-W.; Kim, M. S.
Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2005, 19, 1283–1288
(33) Crowe, M. C.; Brodbelt, J. S. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2004, 15, 1581–
1592
(34) Flora, J. W.; Muddiman, D. C. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 3305–3311
(35) Fung, Y. M. E.; Kjeldsen, F.; Silivra, O. A.; Chan, T. W. D.; Zubarev, R. A.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 6399–6403
(36) Lemoine, J.; Tabarin, T.; Antoine, R.; Broyer, M.; Dugourd, P. Rapid
Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2005, 20, 507–511
(37) Joly, L.; Antoine, R.; Broyer, M.; Dugourd, P.; Lemoine, J. J. Mass Spectrom.
2007, 42, 818–824
.
Haack, M.; Beck-Sickinger, A. G.; Cooper, D. M. F.; Sinz, A. J. Am. Soc.
.
Mass Spectrom. 2006, 17, 1100–1113
20) Back, J. W.; Hartog, A. F.; Dekker, H. L.; Muijsers, A. O.; de Koning, L. J.;
de Jong, L. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2001, 12, 222–227
21) Sinz, A.; Wang, K. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 7903–7913
22) Sinz, A.; Wang, K. Anal. Biochem. 2004, 331, 27–32
23) Wine, R. N.; Dial, J. M.; Tomer, K. B.; Borchers, C. H. Anal. Chem. 2002,
4, 1939–1945
24) Soderblom, E. J.; Goshe, M. B. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 8059–8068
25) Tang, X.; Munske, G. R.; Siems, W. F.; Bruce, J. E. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77,
11–318
26) Lu, Y.; Tanasova, M.; Borhan, B.; Reid, G. E. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 9279–
287
27) Gardner, M. W.; Vasicek, L. A.; Shabbir, S.; Anslyn, E. V.; Brodbelt, J. S.
Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 4807–4819
.
.
(
.
.
(
(
(
.
.
.
7
.
.
(
(
.
.
3
.
.
(
(
9
.
.
.
.
Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 81, No. 12, June 15, 2009 4865