Y. Zhang, D. Ma / Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 244 (2021) 118890
3
with compound 2 in the presence of triethylamine at room temperature
via a one-step reaction, with dichloromethane as solvent. The molecule
structures of the probe were characterized and confirmed by 1H NMR,
13C NMR, and MALDI-TOF-MS, as shown in SI. 1H NMR (400 MHz,
Chloroform‑d) δ 7.93–7.79 (m, 5H), 7.54 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.46 (d,
J = 7.0 Hz, 4H), 7.40–7.36 (m, 2H), 7.24–7.19 (m, 2H), 6.96 (s, 1H),
6.86 (s, 1H), 6.78 (s, 1H), 2.57 (s, 2H), 2.41 (s, 2H), 1.04 (s, 6H). 13C
NMR (100 MHz, Chloroform‑d) δ 169.34, 153.81, 152.10, 136.05,
132.82, 131.96, 131.85, 130.03, 129.11, 128.98, 123.69, 121.52, 113.68,
112.89, 78.90, 43.26, 39.44, 32.34, 28.32. MALDI-TOF mass
spectrometry:491.33.
After obtaining the probe, we first evaluated the possibility of the
probe to detect ONOO− by UV–Vis absorption and fluorescence-
emission spectra under physiological conditions. As shown in Fig. 1
(left), the UV-absorption peak at 400 nm decreased accompanied with
an obviously increasing signal at 545 nm in the presence of ONOO−
.
As shown in Fig. 1 (right), probe NR-ONOO displayed negligible fluores-
cence emission owing to the blocked ICT effect, because the electron-
donating effect of the phenolic hydroxyl group was suppressed by
diphenyl phosphinate protecting group. However, the fluorescence
peak around 678 nm was gradually enhanced and reached saturation
under 560 nm excitation in the presence of ONOO−. Noteworthy,
probe NR-ONOO shows a large Stokes shift (133 nm) in response to
ONOO−, which is much larger than other reported probes. This large
Stokes shift is beneficial to minimize the interferences originated from
self-absorption. Besides, it can be observed that the fluorescence spec-
trum of probe NR-ONOO after reaction with ONOO− was almost consis-
tent to that of compound 1. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry was applied
to investigate the recognition mechanism and the peak at m/z 291.59
[M + H]+ corresponding to compound 1 was observed after mixing
probe NR-ONOO with ONOO−. Additionally, the reaction product of
mixing probe and ONOO− was monitored by TLC plate (Fig. S9), and
was fully characterized by 1H NMR and 13C NMR (Figs. S10–11)
confirming that the product is compound 1. The above data testifies
that the significantly increased fluorescence signal was induced by the
removal of the ONOO− responsive diphenyl phosphinate group (see
Scheme 1) and the reaction mechanism of probe NR-ONOO accorded
with the previous literature [31–42].
Fig. 2. The fluorescent recognition (slit: 5 nm) of probe NR-ONOO (10 μM) to
ONOO−(100 μM) and other various species (100 μM).
of other analytes made negligible changes in the emission spectra.
These results suggested that the probe NR-ONOO has high selectivity
for ONOO−. Besides, the competing experiments in the presence of
other ROS/RNS were also conducted and there are no obvious fluores-
cence fluctuations with other analytes (see Fig. S5), and the negligible
effect of physiological concentrations (GSH and Cys) at 2 mM level
was shown in Fig. S12. In short, all these results indicate that the
diphenyl phosphinate group of this probe was specifically reactive to
ONOO− over other analytes, causing the excellent selectivity for
ONOO−. Because the normal physiological pH value is about 7.4, we fur-
ther discussed the effect of pH on the fluorescence response of NR-
ONOO to ONOO− in the revised manuscript. The results are shown in
Fig. S8. The probe had great change on the performance with pH
changes (lower than 6.5 and higher than 8.5), but slight effect at phys-
iological pH (6.5–8.5). Those experiments results demonstrated that
the probe showed high prospect for biological utilization.
3.3. Time-dependent fluorescence response
3.2. Selectivity and pH value effect of probe NR-ONOO toward ONOO−
After the selectivity study was completed, time-dependent fluores-
cence experiments of probe for ONOO− were carried out. As shown in
Fig. S6, the fluorescence intensity changing at 678 nm was saturated
within ~25 min when 10.0 equiv. of ONOO− was added to 10 μM
probe, ~40 min when 5.0 equiv. of ONOO−, and ~60 min when 1.0
equiv. of ONOO− was added, respectively (Fig. S6). These data show
The selectivity experiments of probe NR-ONOO toward other ROS/
RNS such as O2•−, H2O2, NO, ClO−, •OH, tBuO•, H2S, SO23−, Cys, Hcy and
GSH were conducted with fluorescence spectrometry. As shown in
Fig. 2, upon the addition of ONOO−, an obvious signal change in the
fluorescence spectrum of probe NR-ONOO was observed under
560 nm excitation. In contrast, even with the addition of 10 equivalent
that although the probe needs a certain period to respond to ONOO−
,
3.5x106
3.0x106
2.5x106
2.0x106
1.5x106
1.0x106
5.0x105
0.0
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
300
400
500
600
700
600
650
700
750
800
Wavelength(nm)
Wavelength(nm)
Fig. 1. (left) The UV–vis spectra of probe NR-ONOO (10.0 μM) in the absence (red line) and presence of ONOO−(20 equiv.) (blue line). (right) The fluorescence emission spectra of probe
NR-ONOO (10.0 μM) in the absence (black line) and presence of ONOO− (20 equiv.) (red line).