EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
probably limited by one of the partial reactions following
adenylation.
General Cloning
Even though catalysis in the chimeras we studied was either
impaired to some extent or completely destroyed, repair of these
constructs might be relatively straightforward. A subdomain
swap is expected to perturb only a limited number of residues
at the hydrophobic interface between the subdomain and the
peripheral structure. Consequently, computational modeling,
coupled with laboratory evolution, might be exploited to identify
and remove inadvertently created voids and clashes (Evans
et al., 2011; Fischbach et al., 2007; Villiers and Hollfelder, 2011).
More detailed guidelines describing the individual strengths
and weaknesses of binding pocket, subdomain, domain, and
module swap for NRPS engineering should be established in
the future based on comprehensive and quantitative data. We
speculate that binding pocket mutagenesis will be the preferred
instrument to achieve small structural changes in substrate pref-
erence (Eppelmann et al., 2002; Evans et al., 2011; Kries et al.,
2014; Thirlway et al., 2012) since this approach is least likely
to wreak havoc on the structural integrity of the synthetase. How-
ever, second-shell and long-range interactions that may be
crucial for larger changes in specificity are ignored by this
approach. If longer fragments are swapped, more profound
changes of the NRPS become feasible albeit at the expense of
possible disruptions of the surrounding machinery. Subdomain
swapping represents a compromise that allows transplantation
of virtually all the selectivity determining residues and minimiza-
tion of larger disturbances to the enzymatic machinery, but activ-
ity loss is still a significant risk. Selectivity filters in downstream
domains, for instance the C domain, may cause additional
problems.
Procedures for cloning and media preparation were adapted from standard
protocols (Russell and Sambrook, 2001). General cloning was carried out in
Escherichia coli strain XL1-Blue (Stratagene). Microsynth AG synthesized the
custom oligonucleotides that were used as PCR primer (Table S2) and per-
formed Sanger sequencing of all inserts amplified by PCR. Restriction en-
zymes and DNA polymerases were purchased from New England BioLabs
Inc. Detailed protocols for plasmid isolation, gel electrophoresis, transforma-
tion, PCR, and ligation can be found in the Supplemental Information.
pSU18_grsB2_AT
For the cloning of expression plasmid pSU18_grsB2_AT encoding the AT bido-
main of the internal module GrsB2 (Table S3), the gene was amplified by PCR
from Aneurinibacillus migulanus genomic DNA in two fragments a and b.
Fragment a was amplified with primer pair grsb2_a_f/grsb2_EcoRI_del_r. Frag-
ment b was amplified with primer pair grsb2_EcoRI_del_f/grsb2_b_r. The
primer grsb2_EcoRI_del_f introduces a silent mutation in order to delete an
EcoRI site inside the gene. Fragments a and b were assembled by PCR
using primer pair grsb2_a_f/grsb2_b_r. The full-length gene was ligated into
the pSU18 vector via the EcoRI and BamHI restriction sites. The resulting
plasmid encodes residues K1549 to G2083 of GrsB2 (UniProt: P0C063), an
additional N-terminal methionine and a C-terminal –GSRSH6 tag.
Subdomain-Swapped pSU18_mgrsA Constructs
Construction of plasmids pMG211_mgrsAA0, pSU18_mgrsA, and pTrc99a_
grsB1 has been described previously (Kries et al., 2014). In plasmids
pMG211_mgrsAA0 and pSU18_mgrsA, the subdomain stretch of grsAA is
flanked by restriction sites that can be harnessed for exchanging the subdo-
main. The subdomain encoding sequences of grsB were amplified from
A. migulanus genomic DNA by PCR using primers mXbeg_f and mXend_r,
where X indicates the specificity of the subdomain in grsB in one-letter amino
acid code (X = V, L, O, P). At the 50-end of the subdomain, the mXbeg_f primer
spans the EcoRI restriction site and the beginning of the subdomain. In order
to append a stretch between the 30-end of the subdomain and the SacI
restriction site, a second fragment was amplified with primers mend_f and
T7TR. The overlapping fragments were assembled by PCR and cloned into
pMG211_mgrsAA0 via the EcoRI and SacI sites. From pMG211_mXgrsAA0
constructs, AflII/SacI fragments encoding the subdomain were cut out and
cloned into pSU18_mgrsA.
Further information will be required to ascertain why some
swaps yield active enzymes and others do not. The best predic-
tor of success might be sequence identity of the donor and
acceptor A domains (Table S1). Structural similarity of the donor
and acceptor substrate likely plays a role as well (Figure 2). An
interesting question is whether subdomain swaps also transfer
binding elements for MbtH-like proteins, which often copurify
with A domains and are, in certain cases, required for activity
(Felnagle et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2010). Structural analysis of
an A domain bound to an MbtH-like protein shows that the sub-
domain is far away from the binding interface (Herbst et al.,
2013). If binding subdomains do not participate in MbtH binding,
their transplantation might be more successful than domain or
module exchanges.
A second generation of subdomain swap variants was constructed with syn-
thetic, codon-optimized gene fragments ordered from ATG:biosynthetics
GmbH that encode subdomains for the substrates Phe, Trp, Leu, Gln, and
Arg (Table S4). Sequences of these subdomains were retrieved from data-
bases (Table S3).
Protein Production, Purification and Mass Spectrometry
Phosphopantetheinylated proteins were expressed in E. coli HM0079 (Grue-
newald et al., 2004) and purified by affinity chromatography on NiNTA similar
to a previously described procedure (Kries et al., 2014). Bacterial cultures
were grown in LB medium containing 20 mg/ml chloramphenicol for pSU18
constructs and 150 mg/ml ampicillin for pTrc99a_grsB1. Protein production
was induced by adding 250 mM isopropyl b-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside to
500 ml of culture incubated in a rotary shaker at 37ꢂC and 250 rpm. Cells
were harvested by centrifugation after 16–20 hr at 18ꢂC and lysed by sonicat-
ion in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 0.5 M NaCl supplemented with 1 mg/ml
chicken egg white lysozyme, 1 mM tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP),
and protease inhibitor (Sigma, P8849). The cleared lysate was applied to
NiNTA columns. The columns were washed with 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4),
0.5 M NaCl containing 20 mM imidazole, and 1 mM TCEP and eluted with
the same buffer containing 300 mM imidazole. Protein was washed with
assay buffer in Amicon Ultra-15 centrifugal filters (30 kDa cut-off, Millipore).
Concentrations were measured spectrophotometrically using predicted
extinction coefficients at 280 nm. For determining Michaelis-Menten param-
eters, protein was additionally purified by anion exchange chromatography
on Mono Q HR 10/10 columns connected to a Biologic Duo Flow fast protein
liquid chromatography system (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc.). Protein was
SIGNIFICANCE
Our results suggest that a design strategy inspired by the
fold architecture of A domains can be a viable alternative
to previous NRPS design approaches focusing on domains,
modules, and binding pocket mutagenesis. Since binding
subdomains are considerably shorter than domains or
modules, subdomain swapping could pave the way for
NRPS engineering based on bioinformatic searches and
gene synthesis. A simplified procedure for combinatorial
biosynthesis of nonribosomal peptides based on subdomain
swaps may accelerate the development of new peptide
drugs in the future.
Chemistry & Biology 22, 640–648, May 21, 2015 ª2015 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved 645