Communication
bearing substituents at the 1,2 and 5 positions was aminated in oxylic acid can quench this charge providing an alkyl carboxyl-
good yield (2o). Finally, enoxolone, which contains a secondary ate to enter the catalytic cycle.
alcohol and an α,ꢀ-unsaturated ketone was well tolerated (2q).
It should be noted that all but one of the carboxylic acids em-
ployed are commercially available. Conversely, only four of the
corresponding alkyl bromides or iodides are available, high-
lighting an advantage of utilizing carboxylic acids for alkylation
chemistry.
Next, experiments were conducted to support the formation
of radical intermediates. First, when cyclopropane acetic acid
was subjected to the standard reaction conditions, the ring-
opened product 2r was isolated in a 35 % yield after 24 h
[Equation (2)]. Second, the addition of two equivalents of
TEMPO as a radical trap afforded 2s in 86 % yield [Equation (3)].
Further analysis of the products in Equations (2)–(4) revealed
that decarboxylation results in the site-specific contra-thermo-
dynamic formation of radicals at the carbon bearing the carb-
oxylate without isomerization to a more stable species prior to
Scheme 3. A plausible mechanism.
amination (e.g. 2a–c, 2f, 2g, 2i, 2l).
Conclusion
A metal-free protocol for the site-specific amination of a wide
variety of alkanes utilizing carboxylic acids as traceless directing
groups was developed. This operationally simple method util-
(2)
izes commercially available reagents and offers a potentially at-
tractive alternative to alkyl halides for site-selective C–N bond
formation.
Acknowledgments
Support for this research was provided by the National Science
Foundation (NSF), USA (grant number CHE-1465172) and the
Kansas Bioscience Authority. Support for the NMR instrumenta-
(3)
tion was provided by NIH Shared Instrumentation grant number
S10RR024664 and NSF Major Research Instrumentation grant
number 0320648.
Although substituted hydrazines are found in a range of
drugs and insecticides, they are also versatile intermediates
used in the synthesis of azapeptides and a variety of hetero-
Keywords: Homogeneous catalysis · Photocatalysis ·
Amination · Carboxylic acids
cycles, including commercially relevant pyrazoles and tri-
azoles.[5,13] The N–N bond can also be readily cleaved to afford
the corresponding protected carbamate utilizing an E1cB reac-
tion developed by Magnus [Equation (4)].[14]
[1] S. A. Lawrence, Amines – Synthesis Properties and Applications; Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2004.
[2] S. D. Roughley, A. M. Jordan, J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 3451–3479.
[3] a) H. Wolff, Org. React. 1946, 307–336; b) T. Shioiri, Comp. Org. Synth. 6,
vol. 795–828; Pergamom, Oxford, UK, 1991; c) H. Lebel, O. Leogane, Org.
Lett. 2005, 7, 4107–4110.
[4] For electrophilic amination strategies, see: a) D. J. Fisher, G. L. Burnett, R.
Velasco, J. R. de Alaniz, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 11614–11617; b) P.
Starkov, T. F. Jamison, I. Marek, Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 5278–5300; c) X.
Yang, F. D. Toste, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 3205–3208; d) I. Ryu, A.
Tani, T. Fukuyama, D. Ravelli, S. Montanaro, M. Fagnoni, Org. Lett. 2013,
10, 2554–2557; e) Y. Amaoka, S. Kamiio, T. Hoshikawa, M. Inoue, J. Org.
Chem. 2012, 77, 9959–9969; f) J. Waser, B. Gaspar, H. Nambu, E. M. Car-
reira, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 11693–11712; g) Y. Miyake, K. Naka-
jima, Y. Nishibayashi, Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 16473–16477.
(4)
An idealized mechanism is presented in Scheme 3. Irradia-
tion of the photocatalyst provides the oxidizing species Mes-
Acr-Ph* which removes an electron from an alkyl carboxylate
(generated with the strong base DBU). This triggers radical de-
carboxylation to provide an alkyl radical and the reduced pho-
tocatalyst. The resulting alkyl radical is trapped by DIAD to pro-
vide the N-centered radical species A which undergoes reduc-
tion by Mes-Acr-Ph·to regenerate the ground state photocata-
lyst and provide the corresponding amide anion. Another carb-
[5] L. M. Blair, J. Sperry, J. Nat. Prod. 2013, 76, 794–812.
[6] a) D. H. R. Barton, J. C. Jaszberenyi, E. A. Throforakis, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1992, 114, 5904–5905; b) P. Girard, N. Guillot, W. B. Motherwell, P. Potier,
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995, 2385–2386.
[7] For reviews, see: a) J. M. R. Narayanam, C. R. J. Stephenson, Chem. Soc.
Rev. 2011, 40, 102–113; b) J. Xuan, W.-J. Xiao, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012,
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 0000, 0–0
3
© 0000 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim