C O MMU N I C A T I O N S
the film of 1(Cu2) at 200 °C, however, gave rise to clean splitting
into 2 as judged from newly appearing absorption bands, 413
(Soret), 537 (Q), and 573 (Q) nm, encouraging the use of this
process in patterned FET and thermal/optical recording/reading
devices.
As demonstrated above, the Cu(II) metalation of octaphyrin-
(1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1) gave rise to the facile splitting reaction triggered
by increased distortion in the bis-metal complex 1(Cu2), which
provided a rare example of “molecular mitosis” for expanded
porphyrins.11 Studies on the metalation of other meso-aryl expanded
porphyrins are actively in progress to explore their novel reactivities
and potentials.
Figure 2. X-ray structures of 1(Cu2). (a) Top view and (b) side view.
The thermal ellipsoids were scaled to the 50% probability level. Hydrogen
atoms and pentafluorophenyl substituents are omitted for clarity.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by Grant-in-Aids
for Scientific Research (B) (No. 15350022) from the Ministry of
Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.
Å, respectively, and the Cu-Cu distance is 5.42 Å. A tripyrrolic
unit consisting of pyrroles B, C, and D is relatively flat with the
mean-plane deviation of 0.17 Å, while the pyrrole A plane is tilted
by 63° with respect to the above plane and the Cu atom is displaced
out of this plane by 0.757 Å. Collectively, the coordinating structure
of 1(Cu2) is severely distorted, which is in sharp contrast to the
porphyrin 2 that exhibits a quite planar structure as shown by its
X-ray structure with the mean plane deviation of only 0.015 Å
Supporting Information Available: Synthetic procedures and
spectral data of 1(Cu) and 1(Cu2), absorption spectral changes of 1-
(Cu2) during heating in the film state, Arrhenius and Eyring plots,
DSC experiments. CIF files for the X-ray structural analysis of 1(Cu2)
and 2. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
(
Supporting Information).10 These features suggest that the relief
References
of strain in 1(Cu2) may be a main driving force for this thermal
splitting reaction. We thus examined the thermal behavior of 1-
(1) (a) Jasat, A.; Dolphin, D. Chem. ReV. 1997, 97, 2267. (b) Lash, T. D.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 1763. (c) Furuta, H.; Maeda H.; Osuka,
A. Chem. Commun. 2003, 1795. (d) Sessler, J. L.; Seidel, D. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5134. (e) Setsune, J.; Maeda, S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2000, 122, 12405. (f) Chandrashekar T. K. Venkatraman, S. Acc.
Chem. Res. 2003, 36, 676.
(Cu2) by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) at a rate of 25
°
C/min, which revealed a sharp exothermic response between 240
and 280 °C, and the porphyrin 2 was obtained in high yield from
this thermolysis experiment. Such a response was not observed for
either 1 or 1(Cu). From the DSC experiment, the formation energy
of 2 was estimated to be 135 kJ/mol, which can be considered to
arise from a stability difference between 1(Cu2) and 2. One possible
mechanism of the splitting reaction may be 2π + 2π cycloaddition
to give spirocyclobutane intermediate 3, which is split into two
molecules of 2 via a cycloreversion reaction.
(2) (a) Charriere, R.; Jenny, T. A.; Rexhausen, H.; Gossauer, A. Heterocycles
1
993, 36, 1561. (b) Dolphin, D.; Rettig, S. J.; Tang, H.; Wijesekera, T.;
Xie, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 9301.
(
3) Weghorn, S. J.; Sessler, J. L.; Lynch, V.; Baumann, T. F.; Sibert, J. W.
Inorg. Chem. 1996, 35, 1089.
(
4) Srinivasan, A.; Ishizuka, T.; Osuka, A.; Furuta, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 125, 878.
(5) Vogel, E.; Michels, M.; Zanders, L.; Lex, J.; Tuzun, N. S.; Houk, K. N.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 2857.
(
6) (a) Shin, J.-Y.; Furuta, H.; Yoza, K.; Igarashi, S.; Osuka, A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2001, 123, 7190. (b) Taniguchi, R.; Shimizu, S.; Suzuki, M.; Shin,
J.-Y.; Furuta, H.; Osuka, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 2505.
(7) 1(Cu) and 1(Cu2) showed the parent ion peaks at m/z ) 2009.0444 (calcd
for C88
2
H
18
N
8
F
40Cu, 2009.0412) and m/z ) 2069.9668 (calcd for C88
H
16
N
8
F
40
-
Cu
, 2069.9651), respectively.
6
-1
(
8) The Arrhenius plot provided a preexponential factor of 2.2 × 10 s and
an activation energy of 71.1 kJ/mol.
(
9) 1(Cu2): C92H N O F40Cu , M ) 2285.25, Pbcn, with a ) 23.140(3)
21 8 10 2 w
3
Å, b ) 15.364(2) Å, c ) 24.814(3) Å, V ) 8822(1) Å , Z ) 4, µ ) 6.303
-1
3
cm , Dcalc ) 1.693 g/cm , and crystal dimensions 0.80 mm × 0.40 mm
0.20 mm. The data were collected on Bruker SMART diffractometer
at -153 °C, and the structure was solved by direct methods. It was refined
to R ) 0.077, R ) 0.096, GOF ) 1.058 for 6433 with I > 3.0 σ(I).
×
w
The present thermal splitting reaction of 1(Cu2) to 2 may be
attractive also for application to a recording device in terms of the
dramatic spectral changes as well as the perfect material balance.
We thus examined the similar splitting reaction of 1(Cu2) in a film
state. Fortunately, 1(Cu2) was found to form a good transparent
film by spin coating of its 2% toluene solution (500 rpm, 10 s and
(10) The mean plane deviation of 2 was previously reported to be 0.032 Å.
Birnbaum, E. R.; Hodge, J. A.; Grinstaff, M. W.; Schaefer, W. P.; Henling,
L.; Labinger, J. A.; Bercaw, J. E.; Gray, H. B. Inorg. Chem. 1995, 34,
3625.
(
11) Molecular mitosis reactions are known for calix[n]arenes and calix[n]-
pyrroles, but it is difficult to consider them for fully conjugated, expanded
porphyrins. (a) Gutsche, C. D. In Calixarenes, Monographs in Supramo-
lecular Chemsitry; Stoddart, J. F., Ed.; The Royal Chemical Society:
Cambridge, 1989; pp 5-58. (b) Sessler, J. L.; Anzenbacher, P.; Shriver,
J. A.; Jursikova, K.; Lynch, V. M.; Marquez, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
2000 rpm, 60s) onto the quartz. In the film state, 1(Cu2) exhibited
122, 12061.
broad bands at 354, 531, and 693 nm due to aggregation and was
more robust than in solution, being stable under 140 °C. Heating
JA031935T
J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 126, NO. 10, 2004 3047