ChemSusChem
10.1002/cssc.202000464
FULL PAPER
[
9]
[10]
11]
N. Theaker, J. Strain, B. Kumar, J. P. Brian, S. Kumari and J. M.
Spurgeon, Electrochim. Acta, 2018, 274, 1-8.
liquid product were determined by taking the difference
between the final and initial concentrations. A 400 µL
Gurudayal, D. Perone, S. Malani, Y. Lum, S. Haussener and J. W.
Ager, ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 2019, 2, 4551-4559.
C. W. Li, J. Ciston and M. W. Kanan, Nature, 2014, 508, 504-507.
L. Wang, S. Nitopi, A. B. Wong, J. L. Snider, A. C. Nielander, C. G.
Morales-Guio, M. Orazov, D. C. Higgins, C. Hahn and T. F.
Jaramillo, Nature Catalysis, 2019, 2, 702-708.
2
aliquot of the catholyte was mixed with 100 µL of D O that
[
contained ~100 ppm dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, ACS
grade, Amresco). The peak area of the DMSO internal
[12]
standard was compared to the peak area of each liquid
product in 1H-NMR using a Varian 700 MHz cold-probe
[13]
H. Zhang, J. Li, M.-J. Cheng and Q. Lu, ACS Catal., 2019, 9, 49-
65.
[14]
M. Jouny, W. Luc and F. Jiao, Nature Catalysis, 2018, 1, 748-755.
B. Kumar, J. P. Brian, V. Atla, S. Kumari, K. A. Bertram, R. T.
White and J. M. Spurgeon, ACS Catal., 2016, 6, 4739-4745.
J. Yano, T. Morita, K. Shimano, Y. Nagami and S. Yamasaki, J.
Solid State Electrochem., 2007, 11, 554-557.
while using a water peak suppression technique. For non-
pulsed experiments, the faradaic efficiency was determined
directly by comparing the charge required to produce the
measured products to the total charge passed as measured
by the potentiostat. Because of the constantly shifting
convolution of faradaic and transient non-faradaic (i.e.,
double-layer capacitive charging) currents during pulsed-
bias conditions, it is not straightforward to calculate faradaic
efficiency for pulsed-bias experiments. Instead, for pulsed-
bias experiments the selectivity was based on the product
distribution by charge, which was calculated by comparing
the charge required to produce a given product relative to
the charge required to produce all the measured products.
Thus, the product distribution by charge is the same as
faradaic efficiency except that it does not account for
charge passed which did not result in a detected product.
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
J. Yano and S. Yamasaki, J. Appl. Electrochem., 2008, 38, 1721-
1
726.
S. Ishimaru, R. Shiratsuchi and G. Nogami, J. Electrochem. Soc.,
000, 147, 1864-1867.
2
K. W. Kimura, K. E. Fritz, J. Kim, J. Suntivich, H. D. Abruna and T.
Hanrath, Chemsuschem, 2018, 11, 1781-1786.
G. Nogami, H. Itagaki and R. Shiratsuchi, J. Electrochem. Soc.,
1994, 141, 1138-1142.
A. Engelbrecht, C. Uhlig, O. Stark, M. Hammerle, G. Schmid, E.
Magori, K. Wiesner-Fleischer, M. Fleischer and R. Moos, J.
Electrochem. Soc., 2018, 165, J3059-J3068.
E. Bertheussen, A. Verdaguer-Casadevall, D. Ravasio, J. H.
Montoya, D. B. Trimarco, C. Roy, S. Meier, J. Wendland, J. K.
Norskov, I. E. L. Stephens and I. Chorkendorff, Angew. Chem.-Int.
Edit., 2016, 55, 1450-1454.
[22]
[23]
A. A. Peterson and J. K. Norskov, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 2,
251-258.
[
24]
J. M. Strain and J. M. Spurgeon, Journal of Co2 Utilization, 2020,
35, 298-302.
C. C. L. McCrory, S. Jung, I. M. Ferrer, S. M. Chatman, J. C.
Peters and T. F. Jaramillo, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 4347-
4357.
[25]
Catalyst Characterization
A scanning electron microscope (FEI NOVA nano-SEM
6
00) was used to image the surface morphology of the Cu
foil. A Bruker D8 powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) system
was used for crystal structure and phase analysis using
non-monochromated Cu-Kα radiation produced by an X-ray
tube operated at 40 kV and 40 mA. The sample XRD
patterns were scanned between 30-80° at a scan speed of
4
s per step with a step size of 0.02°.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge support from the Conn Center for
Renewable Energy Research at the University of Louisville.
Keywords: carbon monoxide • reduction • pulsed bias •
catalysis • electrochemistry
Notes and references
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
O. Bushuyev, P. De Luna, C. T. Dinh, L. Tao, G. Saur, J. van de
Lagemaat, S. O. Kelly and E. H. Sargent, Joule, 2018, 2, 825-832.
J. M. Spurgeon and B. Kumar, Energy Environ. Sci., 2018, 11,
1
536-1551.
M. Jouny, W. Luc and F. Jiao, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2018, 57,
165-2177.
2
K. P. Kuhl, E. R. Cave, D. N. Abram and T. F. Jaramillo, Energy
Environ. Sci., 2012, 5, 7050-7059.
C. W. Li and M. W. Kanan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 7231-
7234.
Y. W. Lum, B. B. Yue, P. Lobaccaro, A. T. Bell and J. W. Ager, J.
Phys. Chem. C, 2017, 121, 14191-14203.
J. Perez-Ramirez and N. Lopez, Nature Catalysis, 2019, 2, 971-
976.
B. A. Rosen, A. Salehi-Khojin, M. R. Thorson, W. Zhu, D. T.
Whipple, P. J. A. Kenis and R. I. Masel, Science, 2011, 334, 643-
644.
6
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.