C O MMU N I C A T I O N S
Table 1. GSSM Mutants with Enhanced Enantioselectivity
substrate concentration. HGN (1 g, 9 mmol) was dissolved in
phosphate buffer (2.03 mL), and A190H nitrilase (30 mg) was
added. The reaction, was stirred at 20 °C for 15 h to furnish the
a
b
nitrilase
[HGN] 100 mM, % ee
[HGN] 2.25 M, % ee
time, h
WT
Ala55Gly
Ile60Glu
94.5 ( 0.1
96.5 ( 0.4
96.5 ( 0.5
97.9 ( 0.1
96.8 ( 0.2
96.5 ( 0.2
95.8 ( 0.5
97.9 ( 0.1
97.9 ( 0.1
97.9 ( 0.1
97.9 ( 0.1
97.9 ( 0.1
97.9 ( 0.1
87.8 ( 0.2
nd
24
>160
>160
15
-
1
-1
desired acid (R)-2 (1.1 g, 96%, 98.5% ee) with a 619 g L
d
nd
volumetric productivity. This demonstrates that an efficient process
achieving both high product enantiomeric excess and volumetric
productivity may be accessed using the evolved nitrilase.
The benefits of the GSSM evolution strategy were demonstrated
through identification and development of an improved nitrilase
that provides practical access to a valuable intermediate for the
drug Lipitor. Changing Ala to His provided a 10% increase in the
enantiomeric excess at the commercially relevant 3 M substrate
reaction concentration. Furthermore, error-prone PCR or gene
recombination of this enzyme with known nitrilases would not have
furnished the improved A190H variant enzyme. We currently are
attempting to solve the structure of this variant as well as the wild-
type enzyme to gain an understanding of the molecular interactions
responsible the improvements.
Ala190His
Ala190Ser
Ala190Thr
Asn111Ser
Phe191Leu
Phe191Thr
Phe191Met
Phe191Val
Met199Glu
Met199Leu
98.1 ( 0.1
95.5 ( 0.7
96.6 ( 0.4
96.1 ( 0.9
40
40
>160
>160
>160
>160
>160
>160
160
c
nd
nd
nd
nd
nd
95.4 ( 0.1
a
1
00 mM reactions were performed with nitrilase expressed from E.
b
coli in whole cell format and were complete within 36 h. 2.25 M reactions
were performed with nitrilase as lyophilized clarified cell lysate. All % ee
data were determined at the indicated time and are reported as the average
of three measurements with standard deviation of the mean. Time for
c
reaction completion established by TLC. nd ) not determined.
Acknowledgment. We are grateful to Diversa Sequencing for
sequence confirmation and J. Macomber, J. Verruto, and J. Poland
for subcloning and library construction, A. Solbak and N. Cloar
for colony picking, T. Todaro and M. Lafferty for robotics support,
E. O’Donoghue, A. Flordeliza, and C. Cowden, for protein analysis
support, M. Podar, M. Wall, and T. Richardson for bioinformatics
support, and D. Robertson, B. Morgan, D. Weiner, J. Chaplin, and
J. M Short are gratefully acknowledged for guidance.
enzyme. Secondary characterization of primary hits was performed
by GC analysis using 100 mM of unlabeled substrate 1. These
studies showed that residues Ala190 and Phe191 were enantio-
selectivity “hot spots” with several mutants affording product 2
with higher ee (Table 1). Interestingly, in all identified up-mutations
at position 190, alanine was replaced with a residue that has
hydrogen-bonding potential.
Since the overall objective was to identify a nitrilase that would
catalyze the hydrolysis of 1 to (R)-2 with high enantioselectivity
at >1 M substrate concentration, each of these up-mutant enzymes
was evaluated at 2.25 M substrate concentration. Many of the
variants did not perform well at this higher substrate loading, and
reactions were not substantially complete after 6 days. However,
for each of the serine, histidine, and threonine 190 variants,
significant ee enhancement was observed. The Ala190His mutant
is the most selective and most active of the GSSM mutants allowing
complete conversion of 1 to (R)-2 in 98% ee within 15 h. This is
a dramatic improvement relative to WT, which yields (R)-2 in only
Supporting Information Available: Materials and methods, in-
cluding procedures for the preparation of all reagents, analytical details,
library construction, and screening methods. (PDF). This material is
available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
(
1) (a) Drauz, K., Waldmann, H., Roberts, S. R., Eds.; Enzyme Catalysis in
Organic Synthesis, 2nd ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2002. (b)
Liese, A.; Seelbach, K.; Wandrey, C. Industrial Biotransformations; Wiley-
VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2000.
(
(
(
2) (a) Schmidt, A.; Dordick, J. S.; Hauer, B.; Kiener, A.; Wubbolts, M.;
Witholt. B. Nature 2001, 409, 258. (b) Burk, M. J. AdV. Synth. Catal.
2001, 343, 499.
3) DeSantis, G.; Zhu, Z.; Greenberg, W. A.; Wong, K.; Chaplin, J.; Hanson,
S. R.; Farwell, B.; Nicholson, L. W.; Rand, C. L.; Weiner, D. P.;
Robertson, D. E.; Burk, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 9024.
4) (a) Short, J. M. (Diversa Corporation). U.S. Patent 6,171,820, 2001. (b)
Gray, K. A.; Richardson, T. H.; Kretz, K.; Short, J. M.; Bartnek, F.;
Knowles, R.; Kan, L.; Swanson, P. E.; Robertson, D. E. AdV. Synth. Catal.
88% ee after 24 h at 2.25 M [HGN].
Mutation of an Ala residue to a His necessarily requires a two-
base change in the codon triplet -GCN to CAT/C. This result
demonstrates one of the unique advantages offered by the GSSM
approach for directed evolution of enzymes which permits unbiased
2001, 343, 607.
(
5) Saturation mutagenesis and unbiased access to all 32 (NNK) codons and
6
access to all codon variations. Random mutagenesis techniques
20 amino acids was confirmed by sequencing at nitrilase residues 40,
105, 190, 191, and 300.
based on mutagenic chemicals or error-prone PCR would be
virtually precluded statistically from mutating two bases in the same
codon. Moreover, techniques involving recombination of multiple
genes also would not have been suitable for production of the
Ala190His variant since the nitrilases available in public databases9
do not have His in position 190.
With an ideal enzyme in hand, we sought to develop an efficient
process for synthesis of the Lipitor intermediate (R)-2 at 3 M
(
6) See Supporting Information for details about construction and screening
of the GSSM library.
(
7) (a) Wahler, D.; Reymond, J.-L. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2001, 5, 152.
(
b) Reetz, M. T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 284. (c) Zhao, H.;
Arnold, F. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1997, 7, 480.
(8) (a) Reetz, M. T.; Becker, M. H.; Klein, H.-W.; Stockigt, D. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 1758. (b) Guo, J.; Wu, J.; Siuzdak, G.; Finn, M. G.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 1755.
(9) Pace, H C.; Brenner, C. Genome Biol. 2001, 2 (1), 1.
JA035742H
J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 125, NO. 38, 2003 11477