J. Mao et al. / Catalysis Communications 70 (2015) 62–65
63
cooled to room temperature. After the removal of the solvent, the resi-
due was subjected to column chromatography on silica gel using ethyl
acetate and petroleum ether mixtures to afford the desired product in
high purity.
and DTBP were examined, yet none of them led to the formation of
4a, although product 3a was unfavorable as well (entries 4 and 5,
Table 1). Attempts to replace NaI with other catalysts such as KI, iodine,
TBAI (tert-butylammonium iodide) or TBAB (tert-butylammonium
bromide) were unsuccessful, providing either 3a as the only product
in low to moderate yields (entries 6–9, Table 1). Increasing the loading
of catalyst NaI to 50 mol% did not improve the results (entry 10,
Table 1). However, shortening the reaction time to 1 h favored the for-
mation of 4a in 28% yield (entry 11, Table 1). Finally, temperature was
found to be a determining factor for controlling the formation of 3a
and 4a in this reaction. Although the temperature above 100 °C has a
little influence on the reaction, a lower reaction temperature (60 °C)
completely inhibited the decarboxylation process and pleasingly, the
α-oxybenzoylation product 4a was isolated as the only product in 94%
yield, which drastically dropped to 50% when the reaction was run at
40 °C (entries 12–15, Table 1). As it was known that a decarboxylation
process might occur from β-diesters with heat, we performed an addi-
tional experiment to ascertain whether or not 3a was formed following
decarboxylation from 4a. Interestingly, heating pure 4a in DMF to
120 °C for 12 h led to the isolation of 3a in 43% yield, indicating that
3a was probably generated from 4a.
2.2. General procedure for preparation of oxyacylation–decarboxylation
products through the addition reaction between dimethyl malonate and
carboxylic acids at 120 °C
To a reaction tube equipped with a magnetic stir bar cinnamic acid
(0.3 mmol), dimethyl malonate (0.9 mmol), NaI (20 mol%), TBHP (1.5
equiv.) and DMF (2 mL) was added under air. The resulting reaction
mixture was kept stirring at 120 °C for 12 h. At the end of the reaction,
the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature. After the
removal of the solvent, the residue was subjected to column chromatog-
raphy on silica gel using ethyl acetate and petroleum ether mixtures to
afford the desired product in high purity.
3. Results and discussions
Our initial studies began with a model reaction between cinnamic
acid and dimethyl malonate. It was interesting to note when the mix-
ture of cinnamic acid and dimethyl malonate (1.0 equiv.) was heated
in the presence of catalytic amount of sodium iodide and a common
oxidant TBHP in DMF at 120 °C for 12 h (TBHP = tert-butyl
hydroperoxide), the product 3a, resulting from the sequential oxidative
coupling and decarboxylation reaction, was isolated in 43% yield
(entry 1, Table 1). Although the formation of 3a was deviated from
our goal of gaining a direct oxidative coupling of dimethyl malonate
with cinnamic acid at the α-position, the fact that the α-oxygen
functionalization of dimethyl malonate did occur certainly warrants
further investigation. Therefore, a thorough screening on the reaction
conditions was carried out in order to suppress the production of 3a,
while pursuing the desired 4a from the direct oxidative coupling
without decarboxylation. Increasing the loading amount of dimethyl
malonate resulted in the isolation of 3a in moderate yields, whereas
4a was still not obtained (entry 2, Table 1). It was found that 3a could
be isolated in 70% yield when the amount of dimethyl malonate was
increased to 3.0 equiv. (entry 3, Table 1). Other oxidants such as DCP
With the above optimized reaction conditions for 4a in hand,
the scope of substrates was further examined and the results were
listed in Table 2. First, a variety of cinnamic acid derivatives with
substituents on the aromatic ring were tested. Cinnamic acids with
electron-donating groups including methyl, methoxyl, isopropyl, or
N,N′-dimethylamino units reacted with dimethyl malonate (3.0 equiv.)
smoothly at 60 °C in the presence of NaI (20 mol%) and TBHP (1.5
equiv.), affording the corresponding products 4b–4e in 80–95% yields.
The reactions were equally efficient when some cinnamic acids having
electron-withdrawing substituents were employed. In addition, the het-
erocyclic analogue of cinnamic acid, 3-(3-pyridyl)acrylic acid also
furnished the reaction, giving 4j in 97% yield. At this end, several general
carboxylic acids including benzoic acid and 5-bromo-2-furoic acid were
utilized for the reactions with dimethyl malonate under the optimal
Table 2
α-Oxybenzoylation of dimethyl malonatea.
Table 1
Screening of reaction conditions.a
Entry
Catalyst
(equiv.)
Oxidant
Temp. (°C)
Time (h)
Yieldb
(%, 3a)
Yieldb
(%, 4a)
1c
2d
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
NaI (0.2)
NaI (0.2)
NaI (0.2)
NaI (0.2)
NaI (0.2)
TBAI (0.2)
KI (0.2)
TBHP
TBHP
TBHP
DCP
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
130
100
60
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
1
43
58
70
20
62
65
52
b5
b5
71
52
55
50
N.D.
N.D.
Trace
Trace
Trace
Trace
Trace
Trace
Trace
Trace
Trace
Trace
28
DTBP
TBHP
TBHP
TBHP
TBHP
TBHP
TBHP
TBHP
TBHP
TBHP
TBHP
I2 (0.2)
TBAB (0.2)
NaI (0.5)
NaI (0.2)
NaI (0.2)
NaI (0.2)
NaI (0.2)
NaI (0.2)
12
12
12
12
Trace
30
94
40
50
N.D.: Not detected. DCP: dicumyl peroxide; DTBP: di-t-butyl peroxide.
a
Unless otherwise stated, all reactions were carried out with 1a (0.3 mmol), 2a
(0.9 mmol), a catalyst (0.2–0.5 mol%) and an oxidant (0.45 mmol) in DMF in the air.
aReaction conditions: 1 (0.3 mmol), 2 (0.9 mmol), NaI (0.2 mol%) and TBHP (0.45 mmol)
in DMF at 60 °C in the air.
bIsolated yield.
c16 h.
b
Isolated yield.
0.3 mmol of 2a was used.
c
d
0.6 mmol of 2a was used.