1
282
E. Colacino et al.
LETTER
good yields depending on the physical states of both the Acknowledgment
PEG and the substrates, that seem to play a key role.
We thank the CNRS and the Ligue Contre le Cancer for financial
When liquid phenyl iodide (1a) was used, all conditions support.
yielded good results: small or large PEGs afforded aver-
age yields of diphenylethyne (3a).
References and Notes
PEG550 monomethylether (entries 3–5) or PEG3400 (entry
(
1) Sonogashira, K.; Tohda, Y.; Hagihara, N. Tetrahedron Lett.
975, 4467.
8
) were the best solvents for the synthesis of 1-(4-
1
cyanophenyl)-2-phenylethyne (3g), with yields ranging
from 41% (entry 3) up to 99% at 200 °C (entry 4) or at 220
(
2) Sonogashira, K. Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, Vol. 3;
Trost, B. M., Ed.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1999, 521.
°
C (entry 5) for shorter reaction times. The coupling prod-
(3) Sonogashira, K. Metal-Catalysed Cross-Coupling
Reactions; Diederich, F.; Stang, P. J., Eds.; Wiley-VCH:
Weinheim, 1998, Chap 5.
uct 1-(4-nitrophenyl)-2-phenylethyne (3c) was obtained
in 47–58% yields in solid PEGs (entries 6, 7 and 10). Poor
yields and extensive degradation was observed in liquid
PEGs (entries 1–3). When 2-nitroiodobenzene (1d) was
the substrate, very poor yields of 1-(2-nitrophenyl)-2-phe-
nylethyne (3d) were obtained in any PEG (entries 1–3 and
(
(
4) Hegedus, L. S. J. Organomet. Chem. 1992, 422, 301.
5) Nicolaou, K. C.; Dai, W.-M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1991, 30, 1387.
(6) Bunz, U. H. F. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 1605.
(7) Wu, R.; Schumm, J. S.; Pearson, D. L.; Tour, J. M. J. Org.
Chem. 1996, 61, 6906.
6
–10). Probably, the nitro group in ortho position to the
1
6,39
(
8) Handbook of Organopalladium Chemistry for Organic
Synthesis; Negishi, E.-i., Ed.; Wiley: New York, 2002.
9) Zapf, A.; Beller, M. Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7, 2908.
alkyne moiety is not tolerated under these conditions.
Moderate yields of 1-(4-methylphenyl)-2-phenylethyne
(
(
(
3e) could be obtained only in PEG550 (entry 3) or PEG2000
entry 10) monomethylether, and higher temperatures
(
(
10) Hassan, J.; Sevignon, M.; Gozzi, C.; Schultz, E.; Lemaire,
M. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 1359.
11) Beletskaya, I. P.; Cheprakov, A. V. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2004,
248, 2337.
with shorter reaction time afforded even lower conversion
of the starting materials. The isomeric 1-(2-methylphe-
nyl)-2-phenylethyne (3f) could be obtained with good
yields in every type of PEG (entries 1–3, 6, 7 and 10).
However the reaction did not proceed in the absence of
PEG, clearly showing that the PEGs play a key role in the
catalytic system. Very poor yields were obtained in DMF
(12) Okuro, K.; Furuune, M.; Miura, M.; Nomura, M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 5363.
13) Dawei, M.; Feng, L. Chem. Commun. 2004, 17, 1934.
14) Thathagar, M. B.; Beckers, J.; Rothenberg, G. Green Chem.
(
(
2004, 6, 215.
(
15) Okuro, K.; Furuune, M.; Enna, M.; Miura, M.; Nomura, M.
(
9%). In the case of 4-iodoanisole (1b), 1-(4-methoxy-
J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 4716.
phenyl)-2-phenylethyne (3b) could be obtained in moder-
ate yields in DMF (44%) or PEG3400 (entry 7). Better
results were obtained in PEG550 monomethylether and
recycling was also possible (entries 3 and 4). On the
(16) He, H.; Wu, Y.-J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 3237.
(17) Trofimov, B. A.; Stepanova, Z. V.; Sobenina, L. N.;
Mikhaleva, A. I.; Ushakov, I. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45,
6513.
(
(
18) Sauvagnat, B.; Lamaty, F.; Lazaro, R.; Martinez, J.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 6371.
19) Ribière, P.; Yadav-Bhatnagar, N.; Martinez, J.; Lamaty, F.
QSAR Comb. Sci. 2004, 23, 911.
contrary, the yield of the isomeric cross-coupling product
0
1
-(2-methoxyphenyl)-2-phenylethyne (3h)4 under our
standard conditions was compromised by a competitive
4
1
reaction affording 2-phenylbenzo[b]furan.
PEG2000 dimethylether afforded 3h in a moderate yield
entry 6).
Only
(20) Ribière, P.; Enjalbal, C.; Aubagnac, J.-L.; Yadav-Bhatnagar,
N.; Martinez, J.; Lamaty, F. J. Comb. Chem. 2004, 6, 464.
(
21) Ribière, P.; Declerck, V.; Nédellec, Y.; Yadav-Bhatnagar,
N.; Martinez, J.; Lamaty, F. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 10456.
22) Declerck, V.; Martinez, J.; Lamaty, F. Synlett 2006, 3029.
(
In conclusion, a palladium- and phosphine-free reaction
condition for Sonogashira-type coupling was developed
that used PEG–CuI–K CO as the catalyst system under
(
(23) Chen, J.; Spear, S. K.; Huddleston, J. G.; Rogers, R. D.
Green Chem. 2005, 7, 64.
2
3
(
24) Poly(ethylene glycol): Chemistry and Biological
Applications; Harris, J. M.; Zalipsky, S., Eds.; American
Chemical Society: Washington, 1997.
microwave activation. This reaction was applicable to a
range of aryl iodides. In spite of the fact that higher tem-
peratures were required than with palladium-based cata-
(
(
25) Gravert, D. J.; Janda, K. D. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 489.
26) Declerck, V.; Ribière, P.; Nédellec, Y.; Allouchi, H.;
Martinez, J.; Lamaty, F. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 201.
1
,42,43
lyst systems,
the catalyst system had the advantage of
using available and less expensive reagents that were eas-
ily removable (by simple precipitation). The reaction we
have set up is operationally simple and cross-coupling
products could be obtained in good yields, depending on
the physical state of the aryl iodide–PEG combination. In
general, liquid substrates afforded cleaner reactions and
better yields. The pivot role of PEG for this catalytic sys-
tem has been widely demonstrated and no homocoupling
products were detected in the crude. Since the recovery of
the PEG-based catalytic system is based on a precipitation
step, this system is a very practical alternative to the other
catalytic system for the Sonogashira reaction.
(27) Microwaves in Organic Synthesis; Loupy, A., Ed.; Wiley-
VCH: Weinheim, 2006.
(
(
28) Kappe, C. O. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6250.
29) Deshayes, S.; Liagre, M.; Loupy, A.; Luche, J. L.; Petit, A.
Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 10851.
(
(
30) Caddick, S. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 10403.
31) Thathagar, M. B.; Rothenberg, G. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2005,
347, 1965.
(32) Le Bars, J.; Specht, U.; Bradley, J. S.; Blackmond, D. G.
Langmuir 1999, 15, 7621.
(
33) Yang, Y.; Zhou, R.; Zhao, S.; Li, Q.; Zheng, X. J. Mol.
Catal. A: Chem. 2003, 192, 303.
Synlett 2007, No. 8, 1279–1283 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York