August 2003
903
2
3
)
)
Ali H., van Lier J. E., Chem. Rev., 99, 2379—2450 (1999).
Fiel R. J., Datta-Gupta N., Mark E. H., Howard J. C., Cancer Res., 41,
543—3545 (1981).
Praseuth D., Gaudemer A., Verlhac J.-B., Kraljic I., Sissoeff I., Guille
E., Photochem. Photobiol., 44, 717—724 (1986).
Dougherty T. J., Photochem. Photobiol., 58, 895—900 (1993).
Fiel R. J., J. Biomol. Struc. Dyn., 6, 1259—1274 (1989).
Pasternack R. F., Gibbs E. J., Met. Ions Biol. Syst., 33, 367—397
about rϭ0.2, and then decreases to zero at about rϭ0.4.
These r values are similar to the nCD value (Table 2), indicat-
ing that DNA binding and photonuclease activity are closely
correlated. The nϭ0.17 step was detected only by CD spec-
troscopy. Since the induced CD spectra of C3 at rϭ0.2 and
3
4
)
5
6
7
)
)
)
0
.4 are similar, the binding mode for these steps is the same
(
Fig. 6). Thus, the electronic structure should be quite simi-
(
1996).
lar, and the nϭ0.17 step is not detected by absorption spec-
troscopy.
The face-on binding mode satisfactorily accounts for the
inactivation process for C3. In the rϭ0—0.2 range, C3 lands
softly on the target DNA with self-stacking. At this stage, the
8
)
Marzilli L. G., New. J. Chem., 14, 409—420 (1990).
9) Pasternack R. F., Gibbs E. J., Villafranca J. J., Biochemistry, 22,
406—2414 (1983).
0) Fiel R. J., Howard J. C., Mark E. H., Datta Gupta N., Nucleic Acids
Res., 6, 3093—3118 (1979).
2
1
1
1) Carvlin M. J., Fiel R. J., Nucleic Acids Res., 11, 6121—6139 (1983).
outer C3 is situated quite close to the DNA, it absorbs light, 12) Carvlin M. J., Mark E. H., Fiel R. J., Nucleic Acids Res., 11, 6141—
and generates active oxygen species. In the subsequent
rϭ0.2—0.4 range, C3 piles up and aggregates, further se-
questering the inner C3 species, and ultimately the nuclease
activity is fully inhibited. The distant location of additionally
6154 (1983).
1
1
3) Sari M. A., Battioni J. P., Dupre D., Mansuy D., Le Pecq J. B., Bio-
chemistry, 29, 4205—4215 (1990).
4) Sehlstedt U., Kim S. K., Carter P., Goodisman J., Vollano J. F., Norden
B., Dabrowiak J. C., Biochemistry, 33, 417—426 (1994).
piled C3 in this range is supported by induced CD spectra 15) Marzilli L. G., Banville D. L., Zon G., Wilson W. D., J. Am. Chem.
(
Fig. 6). The signal intensity at rϭ0.2 increases only slightly
Soc., 108, 4188—4192 (1986).
1
1
6) Guliaev A. B., Leontis N. B., Biochemistry, 38, 15425—15437 (1999).
7) Uno T., Aoki K., Shikimi T., Hiranuma Y., Tomisugi Y., Ishikawa Y.,
Biochemistry, 41, 13059—13066 (2002).
at rϭ0.4, although the C3 load is almost doubled. The more
remote location of the additional C3 species from the DNA
axis is expected to induce CD only weakly.
1
8) Bütje K., Nakamoto K., Inorg. Chim. Acta, 167, 97—108 (1990).
The tentacle porphyrins were found to have unique spec- 19) Ishikawa Y., Yamakawa N., Uno T., Bioorg. Med. Chem., 10, 1953—
1
960 (2002).
0) Yamakawa N., Ishikawa Y., Uno T., Chem. Pharm. Bull., 49, 1531—
540 (2001).
1) Ishikawa Y., Yamashita A., Uno T., Chem. Pharm. Bull., 49, 287—293
2001).
tral characteristics, which are well explained by putative
face-on stacking. The C3 linker is effective in enhancing the
binding affinity. The extended hydrocarbon stem of the tenta-
cle, however, promoted piled-up aggregation, which is in-
2
2
1
(
hibitory to the photonuclease activity. Thus, non-aggregating 22) Scatchard G., Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 51, 660—672 (1949).
2
2
3) Correia J. J., Chaires J. B., Methods Enzymol., 240, 593—614 (1994).
4) Uno T., Hamasaki K., Tanigawa M., Shimabayashi S., Inorg. Chem.,
tentacle porphyrins are likely to be more efficient photonu-
cleases and therefore show greater promise in applications in
cancer PDT.
3
6, 1676—1683 (1997).
2
2
5) http://rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image/
6) Nielsen P. E., Jeppesen C., Egholm M., Buchardt O., Biochemistry, 27,
Acknowledgments The authors thank Dr. Anthony J. Wilkinson, Uni-
versity of York, U.K., for valuable discussion. This work is supported by a
grant for Science Research (13557199 to T. U.) from Japan Society for Pro-
motion of Science.
6
338—6343 (1988).
2
2
7) Pasternack R. F., Garrity P., Ehrlich B., Davis C. B., Gibbs E. J., Orloff
G., Giartosio A., Turano C., Nucleic Acids Res., 14, 5919—5931
(
1986).
8) Kubista M., Åkerman B., Nordén B., J. Phys. Chem., 92, 2352—2356
1988).
References and Notes
(
1
)
Amitage B., Chem. Rev., 98, 1171—1200 (1998).