γ-azido butyrophenone derivatives, which consequently
undergo efficient intramolecular γ-H-atom abstraction to
yield 1,4 ketyl biradicals. Expulsion of nitrogen molecules
from the 1,4 biradicals results in the 1,5 ketyl iminyl
biradicals. We used transient spectroscopy, trapping studies
and density functional theory (DFT) calculations to charac-
terize the 1,5 ketyl iminyl biradicals and to support the
proposed mechanism for formation of these biradicals.
Photolysis of 1 in argon-saturated toluene yields 2 as the
major product and smaller amounts of acetophenone and 3
transfer to form the triplet excited state of the azido
chromophore (T1A) of 1, which falls apart to yield triplet
alkyl nitrene 1n and eventually results in formation of 3
(Scheme 3).
Similarly, photolysis of 5 in toluene yields mainly 6 and
trace amounts of 7 and 8. Thus, 5 also reacts mainly by
intramolecular H-atom abstraction to form 6, further indicat-
ing that irradiation of γ-azidobutyrophenone derivatives
generally yield pyrroles.
We theorize that in oxygen-saturated toluene, biradical 1b
must be intercepted with oxygen to form 1bO (Scheme 4).
(
Scheme 2), whereas photolysis of 1 in oxygen-saturated
Scheme 2
Scheme 4
toluene results mainly in 4, 2 and trace amounts of acetophe-
none. We propose that the lowest excited triplet ketone (T1K
of 1, that presumably has a (n,π*) configuration, abstracts a
γ-H-atom to form biradical 1a (Scheme 3). Expulsion of a
)
Biradical 1bO presumably decays by abstracting H-atoms
from the solvent, followed by autoxidation to form 1d, which
is hydrolyzed to 4.
We used calculations to validate the reaction mechanisms
shown in Schemes 3 and 4. The calculations were done using
Gaussian03 at B3LYP level of theory and 6-31+G(d) as the
basis set. We optimized the structures of 1 and T1K of 1
and calculated their IR spectra. We found that the T1K of 1
Scheme 3
6
,7
is 69 kcal/mol above S
0
. The T1K CdO bond is elongated to
) and has a vibrational
1
.32 Å (compared to 1.22 Å in S
0
-1
stretch at 1394 cm . The progression of the C-O bond and
its IR vibrational stretch fits well with the T1K of 1 having
8
a (n,π*) configuration. The energy of the T1K of 1 is
considerably lower than the measured energy of T1K in the
analog valerophenone, which has a T1K that is 74 kcal/mol
(
5) Wagner, P. J.; Kemppainen, A. E.; Schott, H. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
973, 95, 5604.
6) (a) Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648. (b) Lee, C.; Yang,
W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. ReV. B 1988, 37, 785
7) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb,
1
(
.
(
M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Vreven, T.; Kudin, K. N.;
Burant, J. C.; Millam, J. M.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.;
Mennucci, B.; Cossi, M.; Scalmani, G.; Rega, N.; Petersson, G. A.;
Nakatsuji, H.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.;
Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Klene, M.; Li,
X.; Knox, J. E.; Hratchian, H. P.; Cross, J. B.; Bakken, V.; Adamo, C.;
Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.;
Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.; Ayala, P. Y.; Morokuma, K.;
Voth, G. A.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Dapprich,
S.; Daniels, A. D.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.;
Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.; Cui, Q.; Baboul, A. G.;
Clifford, S.; Cioslowski, J.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz,
P.; Komaromi, I.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.;
Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson,
B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian03,
nitrogen molecule from 1a results in iminyl radical 1b, which
cyclizes and dehydrates to give 2. However, a small fraction
of 1a must cleave to form 1-phenylethenol, which tautomer-
izes to acetophenone. Based on the comparison with vale-
rophenone derivatives, where the first two triplet states are
close in energy, we theorize that the second excited state
of the triplet ketone (T2K (π,π*)) of 1 undergoes energy
5
Revisions A.1 and C.02; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, 2004
.
2346
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 11, 2009