772
Y. Shao et al. / Materials Research Bulletin 47 (2012) 768–773
Table 2
Test of catalysts.
Entry
Catalyst
Conv. (%)a
Isolated yield (%)
A
B
1
2
3
4
5
6
SBA-15
0
0
0
SBA-15-SO3H
SBA-15-NH2
6.5
42.8
6
0.5
9.1
6.1
4.2
5.8
33.7
18.2
43
SO3H-SBA-15-NHBoc
SBA-15-A/SBA-15-Bb
SO3H-SBA-15-NH2
24.3
47.2
75.2
69.4
a
Total conversion. Yields determined through 1H NMR spectroscopic analysis with THF as the internal standard.
1:1 Mixture of sulfonic acid-functionalized SBA-15 (SBA-15-A) and amine-functionalized SBA-15 (SBA-15-B).
b
To further confirm the elemental analysis, back titration was
described. XRD and TEM data provide evidence that the
functionalized materials keep a 2D-hexagonal mesoporous frame-
work. Back titration, 13C MAS NMR and 29Si MAS NMR confirm that
the amine and sulfonic acid are successfully incorporated into the
mesoporous SBA-15. Compared with SBA-15-SO3H and SBA-15-
NH2, bifunctional material SO3H-SBA-15-NH2 displays higher
catalytic performance, and shows excellent conversion for the
aldol condensation reaction. These results indicate that the acid–
base cooperation effect should be involved in the catalytic reaction
and efficient acid/base active sites might increase during the
protection of amino group for prevention of the interaction
between acid and base in the bifunctional material.
performed for the materials. It was found that the SO3H-SBA-15-
NHBoc sample gave a loading of 0.2734 mmol/g of sulfoacid and
0.08309 mmol/g of NH2. In addition, the sample of carbamate
deprotection gave a loading of 0.2457 mmol/g of NH2. The results
are in good agreement with the elemental analysis results.
3.2. Catalytic properties
The materials were used in the aldol condensation between
acetone and 4-nitrobenzaldehyde. The numerical results of this
reaction over the catalysts are summarized in Table 2. The aldol
condensation of 4-nitrobenzaldehyde with acetone was reported to
be catalyzed by acid, base and bifunctionalized acid/base catalysts.
The reaction results showed that there was almost no conversion for
pure silica SBA-15 (Table 2, entry 1). Meanwhile, sulfonic acid
functionalized SBA-15 showed relatively low conversion of 6.5%
(Table 2, entry 2). The conversion for amine functionalized SBA-15
was 42.8% (Table 2, entry 3). The use of bifunctionalized material
through protection amino group gave the conversion of 24.3% (Table
2, entry 4), which indicates that there is weak basicity in the
material. However, the bifunctionalized deprotected sample of
SO3H-SBA-15-NH2 showed the significant conversion of 75.2%
(Table 2, entry 6), which was higher than the monofunctional
catalysts of SO3H-SBA-15 and SBA-15-NH2. Moreover, a physical
mixture of acid-functionalized SBA-15 and amine functionalized
SBA-15(Table1, entry5)showedanintermediatelevelofconversion
that was lower than the bifunctionalized acid–base catalyst. In
addition, a slightly increased catalytic activity for SO3H-SBA-15-
NHBoc sample is noted in Table 2, entry 4 with compared with SBA-
15-SO3H (entry 2), suggesting that a very small amount of amine
groups may be not protected with BOC. These results indicated that
the acid–base cooperation effect should be involved in the catalytic
reaction. In addition, the efficient acid/base active sites might
increase due to protection of amino groups from the interaction
between acid and base.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Jilin province (20090591 and
201105006), Jilin University (450060445017), Specialized Re-
search Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education
(20100061120083) and Doctoral Research Fund of Mudanjiang
Normal University (MSB201001).
References
[1] C.T. Kresge, M.E. Leonowicz, W.J. Roth, J.C. Vartuli, J.S. Beck, Nature 359 (1992)
710.
[2] T. Yanagisawa, T. Shimizu, K. Kuroda, C. Kato, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 63 (1990) 988.
[3] I. Rodriguez, S. Iborra, A. Corma, F. Rey, J.L. Jorda´, Chem. Commun. (1999) 593.
[4] A. Stein, Adv. Mater. 15 (2003) 763.
[5] I.K. Mbaraka, D.R. Radu, V.S.Y. Lin, B.H. Shanks, J. Catal. 219 (2003) 329.
[6] X.G. Wang, C.C. Chen, S.Y. Chen, Y. Mou, S. Cheng, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 281 (2005) 47.
[7] S. Dai, M.C. Burleigh, Y. Shin, C.C. Morrow, C.E. Barnes, Z. Xue, Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 38 (1999) 1235.
[8] H. Hata, S. Saeki, T. Kimura, Y. Sugahara, K. Kuroda, Chem. Mater. 11 (1999) 1110.
[9] V.S.Y. Lin, C.Y. Lai, J. Huang, S.A. Song, S. Xu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123 (2001) 11510.
[10] W. Zhou, J.M. Thomas, D.S. Shephard, B.F.G. Johnson, D. Ozkaya, T. Maschmeyer,
R.G. Bell, Q. Ge, Science 280 (1998) 705.
[11] W.H. Zhang, X.B. Lu, J.H. Xiu, Z.L. Hua, L.X. Zhang, M. Robertson, J.L. Shi, D.S. Yan,
J.D. Holmes, Adv. Funct. Mater. 14 (2004) 544.
[12] A.P. Wight, M.E. Davis, Chem. Rev. 102 (2002) 3589.
[13] F. Gelman, J. Blum, D. Avnir, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 40 (2001) 3647.
[14] B. Voit, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45 (2006) 4238.
[15] K. Motokura, N. Fujita, K. Mori, T. Mizugaki, K. Ebitani, K. Kaneda, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
127 (2005) 9674.
[16] B. Helms, S.J. Guillaudeu, Y. Xie, M. McMurdo, C.J. Hawker, J.M.J. Frechet, Angew.
Chem. 117 (2005) 6542.
We also expect that this bifunctional material can serve as an
efficient catalyst for other reactions. Further work is still required
to make detailed understanding of the behavior of the coexisting
acidic and basic sites in a single material.
[17] D. Coutinko, S. Madhugiri, K.J. Balkus, J. Porous Mater. 11 (2004) 239.
[18] J.D. Bass, A. Katz, Chem. Mater. 18 (2006) 1611.
[19] V. Dufaud, M.E. Davis, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125 (2003) 9403.
[20] R.K. Zeidan, V. Dufaud, M.E. Davis, J. Catal. 239 (2006) 299.
[21] S. Huh, H.T. Chen, J.W. Wiench, M. Pruski, V.S.Y. Lin, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44
(2005) 1826.
4. Conclusions
In this study, a method for successfully synthesizing acid–base
bifunctional material through protection of amino group is
[22] J.D. Bass, A. Solovyov, A.J. Pascall, A. Katz, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128 (2006) 3737.