Communications
achievable. The enhancement of reactivity beyond those cases
is likely due to interactions between neighboring acid and
base sites (see Supporting Information for the mechanism).
It is expected that the acid and base groups in SBA-15-
A/B would be in equilibrium between the free acid and base
and the ion pair that results from neutralization, and that the
solvent would have a dramatic effect on this equilibrium, that
is, protic solvents would confer different properties to aprotic
solvents as a result of differing abilities to stabilize the
neutralized ion pair. The equilibrium would lie towards the
ion pair in polar, protic solvents, as proton exchange would be
rapid and the protic solvent would stabilize the ion pair the
most. Nonpolar, aprotic solvents would cause slower
exchange of the protons and would stabilize an ion pair
much less than a protic solvent, thus forcing the equilibrium in
favor of the free acid and base. To investigate these
possibilities, reactions were carried out in a variety of
cosolvents to examine the effect of solvent polarity on
conversion. The conversion into both products is nearly
30% in polar, protic solvents, such as water and methanol
(Table 2, entries 1 and 2). The conversion more than doubles
1
Figure 1. Solvent effect on the line shape of H MAS NMR spectra.
Sharp lines are due to incomplete deuteration of the solvents.
Table 2: Solvent effect on the catalysis.
restricted motion of the two groups as the acid and base
functional groups associate to avoid unfavorable interactions
with nonpolar solvents. The trend is in full agreement with the
catalysis data as reactions in nonpolar solvents cause the polar
acid and base groups to associate to a greater extent, thus
allowing for an increased cooperative effect. The groups are
more mobile in polar solvents as they favorably interact with
the solvent and are less likely to interact with one another for
cooperative catalysis to occur. Taken together, the catalytic
and NMR spectroscopic data suggest that the catalytic
behavior of SBA-15-A/B is clearly dictated by multiple
factors, two of which seem to be the state of the equilibrium
between the acid and base and the ion pair and the
interactions between the two functional groups as caused by
polar/nonpolar interactions with the solvent.
Entry
Cosolvent (1:1)[a]
A [%]
B [%]
Conv. [%][b]
1
2
3
4
5
6
H2O
MeOH
Et2O
CHCl3
hexane
benzene
27
14
52
60
75
62
7
9
13
9
13
12
34
23
65
69
88
74
[a] 50:50 mixture of acetone/cosolvent. [b] Total conversion. Yields
determined through 1H NMR spectroscopic analysis with THF as the
internal standard.
To probe the bifunctionality of the catalyst, SBA-15-A/B
was treated with acid to neutralize the amine functional
groups, thus leaving only the sulfonic acid sites. SBA-15-A/B
was washed with 1m HCl or aqueous para-toluenesulfonic
acid (p-TSA; Table 3, entries 1 and 2, respectively), and it is
clear that the material behaves as the immobilized sulfonic
acid alone (Table 1, entry 2). Likewise, SBA-15-A/B was
treated with propylamine (Table 3, entry 3) and the resulting
material, in which the sulfonic acid sites are neutralized,
behaved the same as the amine-functionalized catalyst
(Table 1, entry 3). These results illustrate the bifunctionality
of SBA-15-A/B and the coexistent acidity and basicity. These
experiments highlight the interesting properties achievable by
immobilization of multiple functional group types. The amine
and sulfonic acid salt out in solution and give rise to no
conversion (Table 1, entry 6), and when the heterogeneous
catalyst SBA-15-A/B is treated with homogeneous acids or
bases the opposing functional group salts out and the
respective behavior is lost. On the other hand, the two
opposing functional groups do not lose catalytic activity when
the amine and sulfonic acid are immobilized on SBA-15-A/B
to about 70% upon moving to polar, aprotic solvents, such as
diethyl ether and chloroform (Table 2, entries 3 and 4).
Nonpolar, aprotic solvents, such as hexane and benzene
(Table 2, entries 5 and 6), give further improvements in
conversion, which approach 90% in the case of hexanes
(Table 2, entry 5). Thus, there is a clear effect on conversion
that is related to solvent polarity, thereby suggesting that the
nature of the solvent does affect the equilibrium of proton
exchange and hence the effective concentration of free acid
and base.
Solid-state CP/MAS NMR spectroscopic analysis was
used to probe the local motion of the bifunctional catalyst.
SBA-15-A/B was fully deuterated and then slurried in
different deuterated solvents to study the changes in motion
of the functional groups in these different environments
(Figure 1). The resolution of the 1H NMR resonances in D2O
and CD3OD (from non-exchanging protons in the organic
functional groups) sharpened, thus indicating a more mobile
structure. However, the resonances broadened in the non-
polar solvents CD3Cl and C6D6, thus suggesting more
6334
ꢀ 2006 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 6332 –6335