European Journal of Organic Chemistry
10.1002/ejoc.202100705
COMMUNICATION
macrocycles.To investigate such a possibility, we used p-
propylanilinium chloride (pPA, for structure, see Figure 1) as a
model compound for APE substituent of 2 and investigated its
interaction with CB7. We found that pPA formed inclusion
complex with CB7 (Figure S13) with binding affinity of 2.5 × 105
M-1 (determined by ITC, Figure S15) and 2.3 × 105 M-1
In
conclusion,
we
prepared
monofunctionalized
cucurbit[6]urils 1 and 2, in which substituents bearing nitro and
amino groups were attached to one methylene bridge of the
macrocycle. The macrocycle
macrocyclization reaction in 16 % yield, and its subsequent
hydrogenation led to 2 in 72 % yield. The macrocycle 2
containing ammonium function underwent self-association into a
1
was obtained by the
(
determined by NMR competitive titration, Figure S14) in 0.2 M
NaCl. These values did not differ significantly from those
obtained for the 2∙CB7 complex, indicating a marginal influence
of the macrocyclic core of 2 on the binding with CB7.
2
dimer as indicated by DOSY measurements in D O. The
dimerization could be suppressed in the presence of 0.2 M NaCl.
The macrocycle 2 formed a supramolecular complex with CB7 in
which its ammonium substituent was included inside the CB7
Two portals of cucurbiturils 1 and 2 are unequal as the
substituent at the methylene bridge position is closer to one of
the two macrocyclic portals. Possible orientation of the
asymmetric guest after its inclusion inside the cucurbituril cavity
can be thus influenced by the presence of the APE substituent,
particularly in the case when part of the guest remains outside
the macrocycle. Such host-guest complexation was tested in the
case of N-pentyl-4-(4’-pyridyl)pyridinium (PV, for structure see
5
-1
5
-1
cavity. Association constants of 2.9 × 10 M and 3.1 × 10 M
were determined by 1H NMR and ITC, respectively. These
values were similar to the one determined for the complex of the
model compounds p-propylanilinium chloride and CB7,
indicating a minor influence of CB6 macrocycle of 1 on the
stability of the 1·CB7 complex. Finally, NMR study enabled the
observation of two diastereomers of the 1·PV inclusion complex,
which differed in the orientation of this unsymmetrical guest with
respect to the inequivalent portals of the macrocycle.
Figure 1) and 1 using NMR in 0.2M NaCl/D
S16). As expected, 1 and PV formed an inclusion complex in a
:1 ratio in which the aliphatic part of the guest is included inside
2
O (Figure 4 and
1
the macrocycle. The binding mode is clearly indicated by the
upfield shift of aliphatic protons of PV (H6-H9) upon
complexation with 1. On the other hand, the signals of the
aromatic part of the guest (H1) shift downfield, which is
consistent with its location outside of the macrocycle. Binding
mode is consistent with those previously reported for viologen
guests and CB6.[24] Closer investigation revealed that, upon
complexation, the signals H3 and H4 of guest PV not only shift
but also double (Figures 4 and S16). We believe that the
splitting is the result of the formation of two diastereomeric
complexes, which differ in the orientation of the guest molecule
with respect to the substituent of 1 (as depicted in Figure 4)
According to the integration of the split signals, we determine
that the diastereomers are present in the solution in 1:0.7 ratio.
Unfortunately, ROESY experiments did not reveal which of the
two diastereomers dominates as we did not observe any cross-
peaks between host and guest protons (Figure S17).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Czech Science Foundation (No.
2
0-13922S), CETOCOEN EXCELLENCE Teaming 2 project
(
supported by MEYS CR: CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/17_043/0009632)
and the RECETOX research infrastructure (LM2018121). We
acknowledge the CF Proteomic supported by the CIISB
research infrastructure (LM2018127) funded by MEYS CR.
Keywords: Macrocycles • Cucurbiturils • Monofunctionalization •
Self-assembly • Host-guest complexes
[1]
J. Lagona, P. Mukhopadhyay, S. Chakrabarti, L. Isaacs, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4844–4870.
[
[
2]
3]
K. I. Assaf, W. M. Nau, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 44, 394–418.
S. J. Barrow, S. Kasera, M. J. Rowland, J. del Barrio, O. A. Scherman,
Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 12320–12406.
[
[
4]
5]
L. Cao, M. Šekutor, P. Y. Zavalij, K. Mlinarić-Majerski, R. Glaser, L.
Isaacs, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 988–993.
M. V. Rekharsky, T. Mori, C. Yang, Y. H. Ko, N. Selvapalam, H. Kim,
D. Sobransingh, A. E. Kaifer, S. Liu, L. Isaacs, W. Chen, S.
Moghaddam, M. K. Gilson, K. Kim, Y. Inoue, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
2007, 104, 20737–20742.
[
6]
W. S. Jeon, K. Moon, S. H. Park, H. Chun, Y. H. Ko, J. Y. Lee, E. S.
Lee, S. Samal, N. Selvapalam, M. V. Rekharsky, V. Sindelar, D.
Sobransingh, Y. Inoue, A. E. Kaifer, K. Kim, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 12984–12989.
[
[
7]
8]
D.-W. Lee, K. M. Park, M. Banerjee, S. H. Ha, T. Lee, K. Suh, S. Paul,
H. Jung, J. Kim, N. Selvapalam, S. H. Ryu, K. Kim, Nat. Chem. 2011,
3, 154–159.
G. Sung, S.-Y. Lee, M.-G. Kang, K. L. Kim, J. An, J. Sim, S. Kim, S.
Kim, J. Ko, H.-W. Rhee, K. M. Park, K. Kim, Chem. Commun. 2020,
5
6, 1549–1552.
C. Kim, S. S. Agasti, Z. Zhu, L. Isaacs, V. M. Rotello, Nat. Chem. 2010,
, 962–966.
Y. Ahn, Y. Jang, N. Selvapalam, G. Yun, K. Kim, Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2013, 52, 3140–3144.
A. T. Bockus, L. C. Smith, A. G. Grice, O. A. Ali, C. C. Young, W.
Mobley, A. Leek, J. L. Roberts, B. Vinciguerra, L. Isaacs, A. R. Urbach,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 16549–16552.
[
[
[
9]
2
10]
11]
Figure 4. 1H NMR spectra of PV (0.2 M NaCl/D
O) and the complex of 1·PV
2
[12]
[13]
N. Zhao, G. O. Lloyd, O. A. Scherman, Chem. Commun. 2012, 48,
3070.
J. A. McCune, E. Rosta, O. A. Scherman, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017,
with magnification of split aromatic signals of both host and guest. The
picture shows two possible orientations of the guest upon its interaction
with the host.
15, 998–1005.
[
[
14]
15]
M. M. Ayhan, H. Karoui, M. Hardy, A. Rockenbauer, L. Charles, R.
Rosas, K. Udachin, P. Tordo, D. Bardelang, O. Ouari, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2016, 138, 2060–2060.
N. Dong, J. He, T. Li, A. Peralta, M. R. Avei, M. Ma, A. E. Kaifer, J.
Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 5467–5473.
3
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.