Inorganic Chemistry
Featured Article
between 11c/12 and 11a, indicating that the additional
aromatic rings incorporated within the helicene ligands of
11c/12, remote from the quinoline moiety, have little
influence in further stabilizing the LUMO compared to the
parent 11a.
ECD Spectra of Complexes 11a, 11c, and 12. The ECD
spectra of the enantioenriched forms of 11a in MeCN are
mirror images of one another (Figure 5b). Enantiomer (Λ)-
11a shows a positive band at 292 nm (Δε = +60 M−1 cm−1), a
weak positive one at 245 nm (Δε = +24 M−1 cm−1), and two
weak negative bands at 275 nm (Δε = −23 M−1 cm−1) and at
219 nm (Δε = −33 M−1 cm−1). Additionally, two negative
ECD bands of very low intensities (Δε = −2 M−1 cm−1) are
found at 375 and 510 nm, i.e., in the MLCT region. The
absolute stereochemistry can be easily deduced from the
starting enantioenriched Ru precursors and confirmed by
comparison of the ECD fingerprints at 292 nm with known
chiral complexes.30
The ECD spectra of diastereo- and enantioenriched 11c in
MeCN are depicted and compared in Figure 6b. Both
enantiomeric pairs (P,Λ)/(M,Δ)- and (P,Δ)/(M,Λ)-11c
display mirror-image spectra. (P,Λ)-11c exhibits more intense
ECD signals with a strong positive band at 291 nm (Δε =
+120 M−1 cm−1) accompanied by a weaker positive band at
335 nm (Δε = +45 M−1 cm−1), a strong negative band at 251
nm (Δε = −135 M−1 cm−1), and weak bands at 523 nm (Δε =
+8 M−1 cm−1), 451 nm (Δε = −11 M−1 cm−1), and 394 nm
(Δε = +8 M−1 cm−1). (P,Δ)-11c exhibits two strong positive
bands at 344 nm (Δε = +60 M−1 cm−1) and 275 nm (Δε =
+70 M−1 cm−1), two strong negative bands at 294 nm (Δε =
−70 M−1 cm−1) and 236 nm (Δε = −100 M−1 cm−1) and
weak bands at 507 nm (Δε = +17 M−1 cm−1), 443 nm (Δε =
−6 M−1 cm−1), and 314 nm (Δε = +22 M−1 cm−1). Overall,
thanks to the presence of the hexahelix, the enantioenriched
11c derivatives display more intense ECD responses than the
11a ones.
The ECD spectra of diastereo- and enantioenriched 12 in
MeCN are depicted and compared in Figure 6d. Both
enantiomeric pairs (P,Λ,Λ)/(M,Δ,Δ)- and (P,Δ,Δ)/
(M,Λ,Λ)-12 display mirror-image spectra. Overall, the
(P,Λ,Λ)-diastereomer shows less intense ECD signals with
more crossing points than the (P,Δ,Δ) one. (P,Λ,Λ)-12
exhibits three strong bands at 277 nm (Δε = −150 M−1 cm−1),
291 nm (Δε = +105 M−1 cm−1), and 337 nm (Δε = +110 M−1
cm−1), accompanied by several weak bands at 306 nm (Δε =
−23 M−1 cm−1), 435 nm (Δε = −24 M−1 cm−1), 507 nm
(Δε = +16 M−1 cm−1), and 547 nm (Δε = −12 M−1 cm−1).
(P,Δ,Δ)-12 displays one strong negative band at 294 nm
(Δε = −295 M−1 cm−1), one moderate positive band at 367
nm (Δε = +115 M−1 cm−1), three weaker bands at 532 nm
(Δε = +65 M−1 cm−1), 277 nm (Δε = +55 M−1 cm−1), and
266 nm (Δε = −50 M−1 cm−1), and one weak band at 446 nm
(Δε = −10 M−1 cm−1). The heptahelicenic structure thus leads
to a strong chiroptical response, which is further increased
through a synergistic contribution of the two Ru centers. It is
worth noting that mirror-imaged ECD spectra were system-
atically obtained for each enantiomeric pair of 11a, 11c, and
12, which confirms that the reactions proceeded without a loss
of enantiopurity.
All of the new complexes are found to be luminescent in
solution at room temperature (Table 2). The emission and
excitation spectra of (M,Δ)-11c and (P,Λ,Λ)-12 in MeCN at
295 K are shown in Figure 8, together with the emission
spectra in PrCN at 77 K. Corresponding spectra of the other
diastereomers of 11c and 12, and of the parent (rac)-11a, are
700 nm in each case, such that most of the luminescence falls
in the NIR region of the spectrum with a maxima of around
790 nm (Table 2). This is a challenging part of the spectrum
for detection, being at the edge of the range for conventional
visible photomultiplier tubes yet somewhat too short for the
wavelength of the NIR detectors. Optimal results were
obtained using a back-illuminated deep-depletion CCD
detector (the details of the instrumentation are given in the
shift in the emission maxima relative to [Ru(bipy)3]2+,
3
reflecting the stabilization of the MLCT associated with the
more extended conjugation on the ligand. Again, there is little
difference between the complexes 11c/12 and 11a. The
emission maxima of around 780 nm compare with values of
700 and 742 nm for quinoline-containing complexes [Ru-
(bipy)2(pq)]2+ and [Ru(bipy)2(biq)]2+, which are perhaps the
closest literature models (pq = 2-pyridylquinoline; biq = 2,2′-
biquinoline).34a A complex featuring an azabenzannulated
perylene diimide could be construed as a related example
featuring the benzannulated phenanthridine moiety of the
em
present complexes for which λmax = 780 nm, though the
nature of the excited state is quite different in that case.34b
The luminescence quantum yields are low, of the order of
0.1% (Table 2). Low values are to be anticipated, given the low
energy of the excited state and the fact that the energy gap law
typically applies well to metal bipyridine-based complexes.34c
However, the luminescence lifetimes of the helicene complexes
remain quite long, of the order of a few hundred nanoseconds
(Table 2), suggesting that the low quantum yields might be
due in part to reduction in the radiative rate rather than to
particularly severe nonradiative decay. Indeed, the estimation
of the radiative and nonradiative rate constants, kr and Σknr,
indicates that the former is around an order of magnitude
lower than for [Ru(bipy)3]2+. Such an effect could be
attributed to reduced metal character in the excited state
with increasingly conjugated ligands35a and/or to changes in
the relative energies of higher singlet and triplet states that
couple through spin−orbit coupling.35b The emission is
modestly quenched by dissolved molecular O2 (as expected
for lifetimes of this order of magnitude) with bimolecular rate
constants of around 109 M−1 s−1.
Although there is little difference between the spectra of the
different diastereoisomers, it is intriguing to note a small but
significant difference between the quantum yields and lifetimes
of the diastereoisomers of 12. The emission of the (P,Λ,Λ)-
isomer is brighter and longer-lived than that of the (M,Λ,Λ),
apparently due largely to an almost 4-fold difference in Σknr.
The difference most likely arises from the different
conformation of the two complex units relative to one another,
influencing the exposure to the solvent and hence the excited-
state deactivation pathways.36
Spectroelectrochemical Properties of Complexes
11a, 11c, and 12. The electrochemical properties of
complexes 11a, 11c, and (M,Δ,Δ)- and (M,Λ,Λ)-12 were
studied by cyclic voltammetry recorded in MeCN under an
inert atmosphere with 0.1 M Bu4NPF6 as the supporting
electrolyte. The half-wave redox potentials were determined
from the average of the anodic and cathodic peak potentials for
the reversible waves. The cyclic voltammograms depicted in
Figure 9 reveal one reversible Ru(II)/Ru(III) oxidation wave
I
Inorg. Chem. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX