2
2
22
electron collection efficiency was the decisive factor. So, the
improved IPCEs upon the introduction of the hydroxyl can
only be ascribed to the improved electron injection efficiency,
in good agreement with the fluorescence quenching behaviors
80 mW cm ), Jsc of 12.8 and 11.7 mA cm can be estimated, in
agreement with the experimental observations. Interestingly, HC-1
and HC-3 also showed enlarged Voc (520 mV for HC-1 and
499 mV for HC-3) than the other dyes, suggesting the cooperation
of the carboxyl and the hydroxyl may restrict the dark current. In
combination with the similar f (0.57 for HC-1 and 0.56 for HC-3)
to the other dyes’ f, HC-1 and HC-3 based solar cells yielded
enhanced g (5.2% for HC-1 and 4.4% for HC-3) over the DSSCs
sensitized by the other hemicyanine dyes. However, the obtained
open-circuit photovoltages are lower than Ru(II) polypyridyl-
based DSSCs, where open-circuit voltages higher than 0.6 V were
2
of these dyes by TiO colloid.
The improved electron injection efficiencies probably result
from the two changes brought about by the introduced
hydroxyl group. The combination of carboxyl and hydroxyl
led to the complexation of the corresponding dyes with TiO
2
as
mentioned above, and the enhanced electronic coupling within
2
6
the formed complex promoted the electron injection. Also,
the introduced hydroxyl led to the cathodic shift of the excited
state oxidation potential (Table 2), and the enlarged driving
force promoted the electron injection. Though HC-5 and HC-6
possess the hydroxyl group also, the lack of complexation
1–6
generally achieved. The relatively low Voc was also observed in
other organic dye sensitized solar cells, and probably originates
from the dark current due to the reduction of both the oxidized
2
27
dyes and I3 by the injected electrons. For Ru(II) polypyridyl
complexes, electron injection occurs from polypyridyl ligands, but
recombination occurs at an Ru(III) center, which is located
2
between them and TiO and their less negative excited state
oxidation potentials may be the reasons for their low IPCEs,
supporting the above explanations on how the hydroxyl
improves the IPCEs.
somewhat further away from the TiO surface than polypyridyl
2
ligands, partly accounting for the fast electron injection and slow
28
Though the fluorescence of HC-3 was quenched more
recombination kinetics. Organic photosensitizers having photo-
induced intramolecular electron transfer properties such as the
hemicyanine dyes shown in this work may mimic the electron
injection and recombination kinetics provided the dye molecules
2
efficiently by colloidal TiO than that of HC-1, HC-1 exhibited
higher IPCEs than HC-3 (similar behavior for HC-2 and
HC-4), which probably resulted from the dye aggregation
upon adsorption onto the TiO electrodes.
2
are assembled on the TiO surface in such a way that the electron
2
The cooperation of carboxyl and hydroxyl led to high IPCEs
accepting moiety attaches directly onto TiO , leaving the electron
2
(.60%) over a wide spectrum region with maximum IPCEs of
2
donating moiety away from the TiO surface. The validity of this
7
3.6% and 64.2% for HC-1 and HC-3, respectively. The func-
idea is worthy of experimental investigation.
tions of carboxyl + hydroxyl in improving the photoelectro-
chemical properties of HC-1 and HC-3 were further confirmed
by the photovoltaic data of the DSSCs based on them.
Table 3 shows the photovoltaic properties of DSSCs based
on the hemicyanine dyes. The overall photoelectrical conver-
sion efficiency, g, is calculated by the following equation:
4
Conclusion
The benzothiazolium hemicyanine dyes with carboxyl as
anchoring group (HC-1, HC-2, HC-3, and HC-4) exhibited
improved IPCEs and overall photoelectric conversion efficien-
cies in the DSSCs than the benzo- or naphthothiazole
hemicyanine dyes with sulfonate and hydroxyl as anchoring
groups (HC-5 and HC-6). More importantly, the combination
of the carboxyl and the hydroxyl in HC-1 and HC-3 improved
the IPCEs further than HC-2 and HC-4, probably resulting
from (1) the complex formation between HC-1 or HC-3
g 5 (JscVocf)/Pin
where Pin is the intensity of the incident light, Jsc the short-circuit
photocurrent density, Voc the open-circuit photovoltage, and f the
fill factor which is the ratio of the maximum output power of the
2
cell with Pin. The g values depended on the anchoring types
2
and TiO , and (2) the cathodic shift of the excited state
strongly and decreased in the order: carboxyl + hydroxyl .
carboxyl . sulfonate + hydroxyl. HC-1 and HC-3 with both
carboxyl and hydroxyl as anchoring groups exhibited much larger
oxidation potentials for HC-1 and HC-3. Accordingly, a
significantly enhanced overall photoelectrical efficiency of
5
.2% was achieved in a DSSC based on HC-1. These results
22
22
Jsc (13.9 mA cm for HC-1 and 12.7 mA cm for HC-3) than
the other dyes, obviously benefited from their highly efficient
IPCEs. From the overlap integral of the IPCE curves for HC-1
and HC-3 with AM1.5 Global solar spectrum (normalized to
illustrate how significantly the anchoring manner of a dye
molecule influences its sensitization behavior on a nano-
crystalline semiconductor, and the optimization on adsorbing
groups may result in more efficient dyestuffs for DSSC
applications.
Table 3 Photovoltaic performances of the hemicyanine dye-sensitized
solar cells
a
Acknowledgements
HC-1 HC-2 HC-3 HC-4 HC-5 HC-6
This work was financially supported by the Ministry of Science
and Technology of China (G2000028204).
2
2
J
V
f
g (%)
a
sc/mA cm
oc/mV
13.9
520
0.57
5.2
10.5
448
0.58
3.5
12.7
499
0.56
4.4
8.9
6.1
7.6
474
0.59
3.1
465
0.55
2.0
452
0.59
2.6
ab
You-Sheng Chen, Chao Li, Zhang-Hua Zeng, Wei-Bo Wang,
ab
ab
a
a
Xue-Song Wang* and Bao-Wen Zhang*
a
Conditions: irradiated light, AM1.5 Global simulated light
a
2
2
2
Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry, Chinese Academy of
(
80 mW cm ); photoelectrode, TiO
electrolyte, 0.1 M LiI, 0.05 M I
propylimidazolium iodide (DMPImI) in methoxypropionitrile.
2
(9 mm thickness and 0.175 cm );
2
, and 0.3 M 1,2-dimethyl-3-
b
Graduate School of Chinese Academy Sciences, Beijing 100039,
P. R. China
1
660 | J. Mater. Chem., 2005, 15, 1654–1661
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2005