6826 J. Agric. Food Chem., Vol. 53, No. 17, 2005
Gand´ıa-Herrero et al.
detergent, it has been suggested that lipids might fulfill this role
(32), and SDS activation of tyrosinase has been demonstrated
in vivo with Terfezia claVeryi sections (33). However, a kinetic
study of the PPO activation by SDS depending on substrate
nature has not been carried out.
Thus, the aim of this paper was to study the variations in the
kinetic behavior of the latent beet root PPO through the
activation process mediated by SDS, by use of different types
of substrates. For the first time, we report a differential activation
of PPO by SDS depending on the substrate nature. This kinetic
behavior is modeled and interpreted in terms of a conformational
change that modifies the access of the substrates to the active
site of the enzyme but does not affect the structure of the active
site itself.
and diphenolic substrates. The selected compounds were the
L-tyrosine/L-DOPA and tyramine/dopamine pairs along with the
hydrophobic diphenols catechol, 4MC, and 4tBC. The in-depth
characterization of the enzymatic activation was carried out on
the latent PPO obtained from soluble and membrane fractions
of red beet root. The effect of the anionic detergent SDS has
been studied in relation to the surfactant concentration, pH, and
the nature of the substrate used to follow the enzymatic activity.
pH Study and Degree of Activation of PPO by SDS. pH
is a determining factor in the expression of enzymatic activity;
it alters the ionization states of amino acid side chains or the
ionization of the substrate. PPO activity was measured, at
different pH values, in the absence or presence of 0.69 mM
SDS. At this detergent concentration the enzyme was fully
active, as later demonstrated, and the concentration is below
the cmc (critical micelle concentration) for the detergent at the
experimental conditions (19, 38).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plant Material. Beta Vulgaris roots (granadina variety) were grown
in an ecological plantation with no addition of pesticides. The roots
were harvested, sliced, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80 °C
until use.
A pH variation in the absence and presence of SDS was
carried out on the soluble PPO for all the selected substrates
(Figure 1). In the absence of SDS, almost no activity was
detected at acid pH values for most of the substrates (Figure
1) with the exception of the more hydrophobic ones, 4MC
(Figure 1E) and 4tBC (Figure 1F). All the substrates showed
an optimum pH over pH 5.5 under these conditions.
Chemicals. PPO substrates and SDS were obtained from Sigma
(Barcelona, Spain). All other chemicals were of analytical grade.
Subcellular Fractionation. Soluble and membrane fractions were
obtained from red beet root slices, as previously described (34). Briefly,
a beet root homogenate was centrifuged at 1000g for 10 min. The pellet,
containing the wall fraction, was discarded, and the supernatant was
centrifuged at 120000g for 40 min. The supernatant was considered as
the soluble fraction, and the pellet, the membrane fraction. The soluble
fraction was brought up to 35-85% (NH4)2SO4. The salt content was
removed by dialysis against 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0.
The extraction of PPO from the membrane fraction was carried out
through treatment with Triton X-114 (34). To avoid possible activation
of the PPO enzyme by endogenous proteases, PMSF (phenylmethane-
sulfonyl fluoride) and benzamidine hydrochloride were added before
and after the dialysis to give a final concentration of 1 mM.
Spectrophotometric Assays. Monophenolase and diphenolase ac-
tivities were determined spectrophotometrically at 25 °C by measuring
the appearance of reaction products in the medium. Catechol, 4-me-
thylcatechol (4MC), and 4-tert-butylcatechol (4tBC) oxidations were
followed by the appearance of the o-benzoquinone product (ꢀ ) 1450,
1350, and 1150 M-1 cm-1, respectively) at 390 nm (catechol) and 400
nm (4MC and 4tBC). Aminechrome formation for L-tyrosine and L-3,4-
dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) (ꢀ ) 3600 M-1 cm-1) was moni-
tored at 475 nm, and for tyramine and dopamine (ꢀ ) 3300 M-1 cm-1),
at 480 nm (35). SDS studies were performed in 50 mM sodium
phosphate buffer, pH 6.5. Other conditions are detailed in the text and
figure captions. The percentage of enzyme activation was calculated
as % activation ) [(activity - latent activity)/(maximum activity -
latent activity)] × 100. Spectrophotometric measurements were per-
formed in a Kontron Uvikon 940 spectrophotometer (Kontron Instru-
ments, Zurich, Switzerland).
In the presence of SDS, the optimum pH value was the same
for the monophenol as for the corresponding diphenol, and this
value did not change in the absence of SDS. Thus, the optimum
pH was 6.0 for the L-tyrosine/L-DOPA pair (Figure 1B,C) and
6.5 for tyramine (Figure 1A) and dopamine. The activation
degree reached in the presence of SDS was 4-fold for L-tyrosine
and tyramine, whereas for L-DOPA and dopamine it was 2-fold.
For monophenols, the characteristic lag period (2) was also
affected by the pH and a decrease could be observed when pH
was increased, in both the absence and presence of SDS in the
reaction medium (results not shown). With respect to hydro-
phobic substrates, the enzyme exhibited an optimum pH of 5.5
toward 4MC and 4tBC (Figure 1E,F). For catechol, the
optimum pH observed was 7.0 (Figure 1D). A significant
difference in the degree of activation by SDS was not found
(around 2-fold) for these substrates. Thus the activation degree
was higher for the enzyme acting on monophenols than on
diphenols.
The pH profiles for all substrates studied in PPO from the
membrane fraction were similar to those obtained with the
soluble enzyme. However, the degree of activation changed
dramatically. Beet root PPO bound to membrane was fully
latent. In all cases the degree of activation was higher than 100-
fold, in contrast to the less than 4-fold activation found for the
soluble PPO. Figure 2 shows the pH profiles obtained for the
most hydrophobic substrate, 4tBC (Figure 2A), and for the most
hydrophilic L-tyrosine/L-DOPA pair (Figure 2B, inset). It is
noticeable that, in the absence of SDS, the membrane PPO
showed activity at acidic pH values (optimum pH ) 4.5).
However, this effect was not observed in the soluble PPO that
was not totally latent (Figure 1C,F). Other authors (5, 19, 21,
23) have proposed that PPO activity can be induced by acid
shocking, depending on the enzyme source. The presence of
SDS eliminated the low optimum pH.
Experiments were performed in triplicate and the mean and standard
deviations were plotted.
Kinetic Data Analysis. The values of Km and Vm on different
substrates were calculated from measurements of the steady-state rate,
Vss, which was defined as the slope of the linear portion of the product
accumulation curve. The lag period was estimated as the intercept on
the abscissa axis obtained by extrapolation of the linear portion. Kinetic
data analysis was carried out by linear and nonlinear regression fitting
(36), by use of SigmaPlot Scientific Graphing for Windows version
8.0 (2001; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
Protein Determination. Protein concentration was determined
according to the Bradford Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA) protein assay with
serum albumin as standard (37).
Differences in the pH profile found for beet root PPO
depending on the presence of SDS for different substrates
suggest that the activating effect of the detergent may be related
to substrate nature. Therefore, the subsequent experiments were
carried out to elucidate the mechanism for SDS activation.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The activation process of beet root PPO mediated by the
anionic detergent SDS was studied with several monophenolic