6794
N. Ramireddy et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 52 (2011) 6792–6795
Table 2
tion (entry 17). As the results show, the two methyl groups at
the C-5 of the dione has some beneficial effects on the enantiose-
lectivity but not on the reactivity (entry 3 vs entry 17). It should
be noted that extending the reaction times may result in slightly
lower ee values of the products. For example, compound 15j (Ta-
ble 2, entry 10) was obtained in 76% ee and 88% yield if the reaction
was conducted for 8.5 h. This is most likely due to a slow racemi-
zation of the stereogenic center under the reaction conditions.11
In summary, we have developed an organocatalyzed asymmet-
ric synthesis of 2-amino-5-oxo-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-4H-chromene-
3-carboxylates using quinine-derived thiourea as the catalyst.
The tandem Michael-cyclization reaction of 1,3-cyclohexanediones
and alkylidenecyanoacetates yields the title compounds in high
yields (up to 92%) and good enantioselectivities (up to 82% ee).
Enantioselective synthesis of 2-amino-5-oxo-5, 6, 7, 8-tetrahydro-4H-chromene-3-
carboxylatesa
R1
R1
O
R2 OR3
O
CO2R3
CN
7
*
O
toluene, 0 °C
R1
R1
R2
O
NH2
O
13
14
15
Entry
R1
R2
R3
15
Time (h)
Yieldb (%)
eec (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
H
Ph
Ph
Ph
Et
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
4.5
4
4.5
4
4
4.5
3
2.5
4.5
6.5
4.5
3.5
6.5
6.5
7.5
92
90
85
88
85
91
75
72
85
84
90
85
86
82
81
67
83
79
69
80
74
76
75
Me
i-Pr
i-Pr
i-Pr
i-Pr
i-Pr
i-Pr
i-Pr
i-Pr
i-Pr
i-Pr
i-Pr
i-Pr
i-Pr
i-Pr
i-Pr
4-FC6H4
4-ClC6H4
4-BrC6H4
4-CNC6H4
4-NO2C6H4
4-MeC6H4
4-MeOC6H4
3-BrC6H4
2-BrC6H4
3-MeOC6H4
2-MeOC6H4
1-Napthyl
2-Thienyl
Ph
Acknowledgments
66d
65d
82d
80
This research was financially supported by the Welch Founda-
tion (Grant No. AX-1593) and partially by the NIH/NIGMS (Grant
No. SC1GM082718), for which the authors are very grateful.
j
l
74
k
n
m
o
p
q
20d
74
Supplementary data
51d
65d
76d
70d
Supplementary data (detailed experimental procedure, com-
pound spectroscopic data, copy of NMR spectra and HPLC analysis
chromatograms) associated with this article can be found, in the
11
4.5
a
Unless otherwise specified, all reactions were conducted with cyclohexane-1,3-
dione (13, 0.1 mmol), alkylidenecyanoacetate (14, 0.12 mmol), and catalyst
(0.01 mmol, 10 mol %) in toluene (0.5 mL) at 0 °C.
7
References and notes
b
Yield of isolated product after column chromatography.
Determined by HPLC analysis on a ChiralCel OD-H column.
Determined by HPLC analysis on a ChiralPak AD-H column.
c
d
1. (a) Bonsignore, L.; Loy, G.; Secci, D.; Calignano, A. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1993, 28,
517–520; (b) Witte, E. C.; Neubert, P.; Roesch, A. Ger. Offen. DE 3427985, 1986;
Chem. Abstr. 1986, 104, 224915.; (c) Andreani, L. L.; Lapi, E. Boll. Chim. Farm.
1960, 99, 583–586; (d) DeSimone, R. W.; Currie, K. S.; Mitchell, S. A.; Darrow, J.
W.; Pippin, D. A. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screening 2004, 7, 473–494; (e)
Kumar, D.; Reddy, V. B.; Sharad, S.; Dube, U.; Kapur, S. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009,
44, 3805–3809; (f) Anders, A.; Jensen, A. A.; Erichsen, M. N.; Nielsen, C. W.;
Stensbøl, T. B.; Jan Kehler, J.; Bunch, L. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 912–915; (g)
Wang, J. L.; Liu, D.; Zhang, Z. J.; Shan, S.; Han, X.; Srinivasula, S. M.; Croce, C. M.;
Alnemri, E. S.; Huang, Z. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97, 7124–7129; (h)
Foloppe, N.; Fisher, L. M.; Howes, R.; Potter, A.; Robertson, A. G. S.; Surgenor, A.
E. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 4792–4802; (i) Ismail, Z. H.; Aly, G. M.; El-Degwi,
M. S.; Heiba, H. I.; Ghorab, M. M. Egypt J. Biotechnol. 2003, 13, 73–82; (j) Zaki, M.
E. A.; Soliman, H. A.; Hiekal, O. A.; Rashad, A. E. Z. Naturforsch. 2006, 61, 1–5; (k)
El-Tamany, E. S.; El-Shahed, F. A.; Mohamed, B. H. J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 1999, 64, 9–
18.
alkyl groups on the benzylidenecyanoacetates (14) have some ef-
fects on the enantioselectivity of this reaction: The ee value of
the product 15 increases from 69% to 80% when the ester alkyl
group is changed from a methyl to an isopropyl group (entries
1–3). These increases are most likely due to the steric effects. Since
the isopropyl group leads to the highest product ee value, it was
chosen for further study. Similarly, the electronic nature of the
substituent on the phenyl ring of 14 influences the enantioselectiv-
ity of this reaction. Electron-withdrawing groups on the para posi-
tion of the phenyl ring result in lower ee values: The stronger the
electron-withdrawing capacity of the substituent, the lower the
product ee value (entries 4–8). Strong electron-withdrawing
groups, such as the cyano and nitro groups, also lead to diminished
product yields (entries 7 and 8). In contrast, electron-donating
groups like methyl and methoxy groups lead to slightly higher ee
values of the product as compared to the unsubstituted phenyl
group (entries 9 and 10). The position of the substituent on the
phenyl ring also affects the enantioselectivity. While meta-substi-
tuted 14 give similar results as the para-substituted ones (entries
11 vs entry 6; entry 13 vs entry 10), ortho-substituted compounds
yield much lower ee values of the products (entry 12 vs entries 6
and 11; entry 14 vs entries 10 and 13). The drop in the enantiose-
lectivity in the ortho-substituted benzylidenecyanoacetates is most
likely due to steric effects. Besides phenyl substituted 2-cyanoacry-
lates, 1-naphthyl (entry 15) and 2-thienyl (entry 16) substituted 2-
cyanoacrylates are also good substrates for this reaction, and the
corresponding products were obtained in 65% and 76% ee, respec-
tively. The slightly lower ee value obtained with the 1-naphthyl-
substituted substrate may also be due to a steric reason. Unsubsti-
tuted 1,3-cyclohexanedione is also a good substrate for this reac-
2. (a) Hafez, E. A. A.; Elnagdi, M. H.; Elagamey, A. G. A.; Ei-Taweel, F. M. A. A.
Heterocycles 1987, 26, 903–907; (b) Morinaka, Y.; Takahashi, K. Jpn. Kokai
Tokkyo Koho JP52017498, 1977; Chem. Abstr. 1977, 87, 102299.
3. For examples of natural compounds containing the chromene moiety, see: (a)
Kemnitzer, W.; Drewe, J.; Jiang, S. C.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, J.; Jia, S.;
Herich, J.; Labreque, D.; Storer, R.; Meerovitch, K.; Bouffard, D.; Rej, R.; Denis, R.;
Blais, C.; Lamothe, S.; Attardo, G.; Gourdeau, H.; Tseng, B.; Kasibhatla, S.; Cai, S.
X. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 6299–6310; (b) Parmar, V. S.; Jain, S. C.; Bisht, K. S.;
Jain, R.; Taneja, P.; Jha, A.; Tyagi, O. D.; Prasad, A. K.; Wengel, J.; Olsen, C. E.; Boll,
P. M. Phytochemistry 1997, 46, 597–674; (c) Gill, M. Aust. J. Chem. 1995, 48, 1–
26; (d) Bohm, B. A.; Choy, J. B.; Lee, A. Y.-M. Phytochemistry 1989, 28, 501–504;
(e) Iacobucci, G. A.; Sweeny, J. G. Tetrahedron 1983, 39, 3005–3038; For a
ˇ
review, see: Núnez, M. G.; García, P.; Moro, R. F.; Díez, D. Tetrahedron 2010, 66,
2089–2109.
4. For selected examples, see: (a) Harb, A. F. A.; Hesien, A. H. M.; Metwally, S. A.;
Elnagdi, M. H. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1989, 585–588; (b) Wang, X.-S.; Wu, J.-R.; Li,
Q.; Tu, S.-J. J. Chem. Res. 2009, 234–236; (c) Zayed, S. E.; Abou Elmaged, E. I.;
Metwally, S. A.; Elnagdi, M. H. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 1991, 56, 2175–
2182; (d) Ballini, R.; Bosica, G.; Conforti, M. L.; Maggi, R.; Mazzacani, A.; Righi,
P.; Sartori, G. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 1395–1398; (e) Abdolmohammadi, S.;
Balalaie, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 3299–3303; (f) Gao, S.; Tsai, C. H.; Tseng,
C.; Yao, C.-F. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 9143–9149; (g) Khurana, J. M.; Kumar, S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 4125–4127.
5. (a) Wang, X. S.; Yang, G. S.; Zhao, G. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2008, 19, 709–714;
(b) Wang, X.-S.; Zheng, C.-W.; Zhao, S.-L.; Chai, Z.; Zhao, G.; Yang, G.-S.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2009, 19, 2699–2704; (c) Xie, J. W.; Huang, X.; Fan, L.
P.; Xu, D. C.; Li, X. S.; Su, H.; Wen, Y. H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 3077–3082;
(d) Ren, Q.; Siau, W.-Y.; Du, Z.; Zhang, K.; Wang, J. Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 7781–
7785; (e) Dong, Z.; Liu, X.; Feng, J.; Wang, M.; Lin, L.; Feng, X. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2011, 137–142.