36
X. Meng et al. / Catalysis Communications 89 (2017) 34–39
Fig. 3. The TEM and SEM images of Cu/OMS-2.
3. Results and discussion
or only using support OMS-2 as catalyst (Table 1, entries 1 and 2). Cat-
alytic amounts of commercial bulk CuO and nano-sized CuO could not
catalyze the reaction under the standard conditions as well (Table 1, en-
tries 3 and 4). Similarly, a physical mixture of CuO and OMS-2 did not
show any catalytic activity in the reaction (Table 1, entry 5). To our de-
light, the addition of Cu/OMS-2 (Cu: 0.25 mol%) led to the desired prod-
uct 1,2-dihydro-1,3,5-triazine (3a) in 91% isolated yield while another
cyclized product 4a was not observed (entry 6). Compared with Cu/li-
gand system of previous research [25], it is believed that OMS-2 en-
hanced the oxidative ability of supported Cu for converting benzyl
alcohol into benzaldehyde, next promoted nucleophilic attack ability
of amidine to carbonyl group, changed the reaction pathway by enhanc-
ing nucleophilicity of another molecule of amidine for the eventual ox-
idative cyclization as well (vide infra). Furthermore, above results
indicate highly dispersed copper species on OMS-2 might play an im-
portant role during the reaction. To confirm the reaction is an oxidative
process, the reaction was run under N2 and it did not proceed, which
means the oxygen in air played a role as terminal oxidant (entry 7).
After the reaction under N2, the XRD was used to analyze the catalyst,
which shows OMS-2 changed to a Mn3O4 phase (JCPDS card no. 24-
0734, Fig. S6, see ESI). Two other OMS-2-based catalysts, acid-modified
Cu/H-OMS-2 [12] (10 mg, Cu: 0.5 wt%) and hydroxide Cu(OH)x/OMS-2
[20] (10 mg, Cu: 1.3 wt%), were used to improve the reaction, but they
failed to show good selectivity (entries 8 and 9). Consequently, the op-
timal reaction conditions for the synthesis of 1,2-dehydro-1,3,5-triazine
can be indicated in entry 5 of Table 1 (for more optimizations and reuti-
lization of catalyst, see ESI).
Firstly, elemental analysis of the catalyst by atomic absorption spec-
trometry (AAS) indicated that the quantity of Cu in the sample was
0.5 wt.%. Next, X-ray diffraction (XRD) was used to analysis OMS-2,
Cu/OMS-2 and the OMS-2 material synthesized by conventional reflux
method (designated as OMS-2-Re) [15]. The patterns in Fig. 1 demon-
strated that the diffraction peaks of OMS-2 and Cu/OMS-2 were the
same as that of OMS-2-Re, which means OMS-2 was formed successful-
ly using TBHP as reductant and its supported catalyst was also typical
cryptomelane materials (JCPDS file #29-1020) [15]. No signals due to
copper metal (cluster) or copper oxide were observed, which suggests
that the copper oxide was low loading and highly dispersed on OMS-
2. Finally, OMS-2 and Cu/OMS-2 were characterized by transmission
electron microscope (TEM) and scanning electron microscope (SEM).
It was found that OMS-2 was very uniform in length and had a typical
uniformly nano-rod morphology (Fig. 2), which was in agreement
with the previous research [15]. Moreover, the width of the OMS-2
nanofibers was in 5–16 nm range based on the counting of 180 particles
(Fig. S3, see ESI). For Cu/OMS-2, the catalyst remained the fibers or nee-
dlelike morphology (Fig. 3) (For more characterization of OMS-2 and
Cu/OMS-2, see ESI).
According to previous reports, it is known OMS-2 has excellent
redox ability [11,16,17,19]. Therefore, we were supposed to direct use
alcohol as starting material which transforms in situ to aldehyde and
then reacts with two molecules of amidine to offer cyclized product
1,2-dihydro-1,3,5-triazine. A screening was conducted to optimize the
reaction conditions by reacting benzyl alcohol (1a) and N-arylamidine
(2a). Initially, background reactions were run in toluene under air at
90 °C, which demonstrates the reaction did not occur without catalyst
With the optimal conditions in hand, we continued to investigate
the scope of the reactions by employing a variety of alcohols with N-
phenylbenzimidamide (Scheme 3). Gratifyingly, benzyl alcohols with
Table 1
Optimization of the reaction conditionsa.
Entry
Catalyst
1a (mmol)
Solvent
Yield (%)b
3a
4a
1
2
3
4
–
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
19
24
OMS-2
CuO (10 mol%)
Nano-CuO (10 mol%)
CuO + OMS-2
Cu/OMS-2
Cu/OMS-2
Cu/H-OMS-2
Cu(OH)x/OMS-2
5c
6d
7e
8
0
95 (91)
0
76
52
9
a
Reaction conditions: 1a, 2a (0.5 mmol), catalyst (10 mg), solvent (2 mL), air, 90 °C, 20 h.
NMR yield using CH2Br2 an internal standard and isolated yield is given in parenthesis.
10 mol% of CuO and 10 mg OMS-2 were used.
10 mg of Cu/OMS-2 (Cu: 0.5 wt%) was used.
Under N2.
b
c
d
e