immobilization process, and it has to be taken into account
that the methodology can have a definite effect on the activity
and selectivity of the resulting catalysts.5
Scheme 1
We have shown that bis(oxazoline)-Cu(II) complexes can
be immobilized by formation of ion pairs with anionic solids6
and that the solids obtained promote enantioselective cyclo-
propanation reactions. Whereas the immobilized 2,2′-
isopropylidenebis[(4R)-4-phenyl-2-oxazoline]-Cu(II) com-
plex is stable, leads to good results, and can be reused, the
steric interactions with the support limit the applicability of
this strategy to immobilize the 2,2′-isopropylidenebis[(4S)-
4-tert-butyl-2-oxazoline].
Very recently a family of related chiral ligands, aza-bis-
(oxazolines), has been described.7 These ligands can be
attached to soluble polymeric supports, forming soluble
catalysts which can be recovered by precipitation. The utility
of this strategy has been demonstrated also in enantioselective
cyclopropanation reactions.
In this Letter, we present the first results on the im-
mobilization of bis(oxazoline)-Cu(II) complexes by forma-
tion of covalent bonds between the ligand and an organic
polymer and the use of these solids as insoluble catalysts in
enantioselective cyclopropanation, one of the reactions in
which these ligands form excellent catalysts in the homo-
geneous phase.8
Different strategies of covalent bonding of the bis-
(oxazoline) to a polymeric support were initially tested with
a ligand bearing phenyl groups (1a).
Double alkylation in the methylene bridge was carried out
with methyllithium in THF as a base (Scheme 1). In this
way the model ligand 2a for a homogeneous test was
prepared. In the preparation of polymer-supported enanti-
oselective catalysts, polymerization was shown to provide,
in some cases, advantages over grafting.5b,9 Dialkylation with
p-vinylbenzyl chloride led to 3a which was used in different
polymerization processes. The use of this monomer was
considered advantageous with regard to the C2 symmetry of
the chiral ligand.10 This monomer was used in a copolym-
erization process with styrene using AIBN as a radical
initiator and 1-dodecanol/toluene as the porogenic mixture
(polymeric ligand 4a) using the general protocol for the
preparation of the monolithic resins developed by Fre´chet.11
It was also used in three different homopolymerization
processes: in the first one the monomer is left to polymerize
thermally (ligand 5a) and in the second and third ones AIBN
was used to initiate the reaction and toluene (ligand 6a) or
a mixture of 1-dodecanol/toluene (ligand 7a) was used as
porogenic agent.
All the polymers showed the FT-IR bands corresponding
to the bis(oxazoline) ligand, mainly the CdN band at ca.
1655 cm-1. The polymeric catalysts were obtained by
treatment of resins 4-7 with Cu(OTf)2, and the copper
contents were determined by plasma emission spectroscopy.
The solids were tested as catalysts in the cyclopropanation
reaction of styrene and ethyl diazoacetate in equimolecular
amounts (Scheme 2). Table 1 compares the results obtained
with the homogeneous and the different polymeric catalysts.
The solid obtained by copolymerization with styrene 4a
(6) (a) Fraile, J. M.; Garc´ıa, J. I.; Mayoral, J. A.; Tarnai, T. Tetrahe-
dron: Asymmetry 1997, 8, 2089-2092. (b) Fraile, J. M.; Garc´ıa, J. I.;
Mayoral, J. A.; Tarnai, T. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1998, 9, 3997-4008.
(c) Fraile, J. M.; Garc´ıa, J. I.; Mayoral, J. A.; Tarnai, T.; Harmer, M. A. J.
Catal. 1999, 186, 214-221. (d) Alonso, P. J.; Fraile, J. M.; Garc´ıa, J.;
Garc´ıa, J. I.; Mart´ınez, J. I.; Mayoral, J. A.; Sa´nchez, M. C. Langmuir 2000,
16, 5607-5612.
(7) Glos, M.; Reiser, O. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2045-2048.
(8) (a) Lowenthal, R. E.; Abiko, A.; Masamune, S. Tetrahedron Lett.
1990, 31, 6005-6008. (b) Lowenthal, R. E.; Masamune, S. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1991, 32, 7373-7376. (c) Evans, D. A.; Woerpel, K. A.; Hinman, M.
M.; Faul, M. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 726-728. (d) Bedekar, A.
V.; Andersson, P. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 4073-4076. (e) Bedekar,
A. V.; Koroleva, E. B.; Andersson, P. G. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 2518-
2526. (f) End, N.; Pfaltz, A. Chem. Commun. 1998, 589-590. (g) Boulch,
R.; Scheurer, A.; Mosset, P.; Saalfrank, R. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41,
1023-1026.
(9) (a) Itsuno, S.; Sakurai, Y.; Ito, K.; Maruyama, T.; Nakahama, S.;
Fre´chet, J. M. J. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 304-310. (b) Kamahori, K.; Tada,
S.; Ito, K.; Itsuno, S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1995, 6, 2547-2555.
(10) Halm, C.; Kurth, M. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1998, 37, 510-
512.
(11) (a) Svec, F.; Fre´chet, J. M. J. Chem. Mater. 1995, 7, 707-715. (b)
Svec, F.; Fre´chet, J. M. J. Science 1996, 273, 205-211. (c) Xie, S.; Svec,
F.; Fre´chet, J. M. J. Chem. Mater. 1998, 10, 4072-4078. (d) Svec, F.;
Fre´chet, J. M. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1999, 38, 34-48. (e) Hird, N.;
Hughes, I.; Hunter, D.; Morrison, M. G. J. T.; Sherrington, D. C.; Stevenson,
L. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 9575-9584.
(12) (a) Altava, B.; Burguete, M. I.; Fraile, J. M.; Garc´ıa, J. I.; Luis, S.
V.; Mayoral, J. A.; Vicent, M. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 1503-
1506. (b) Breysse, E.; Pinel, C.; Lemaire, M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1998,
9, 897-900.
(13) (a) Altava, B.; Burguete, M. I.; Escuder, B.; Luis, S. V.; Salvador,
R.; Fraile, J. M.; Mayoral, J. A.; Royo, A. J. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 3126-
3134. (b) Hodge, P. In InnoVation and PerspectiVes in Solid-Phase Synthesis;
Epton, R., Ed.; SPCC (UK) Ltd.: Birmingham, 1990; pp 273-292.
3906
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 24, 2000