1440
Russ.Chem.Bull., Int.Ed., Vol. 63, No. 6, June, 2014
Kirillov et al.
meter (Perkin—Elmer). The H (300 MHz) and 13C (75 MHz)
1
sulfate, the solvents were distilled off, and the products were
recrystallized from ethyl acetate.
NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl on a Mercury Plusꢀ300
3
spectrometer using SiMe4 as the internal standard. Quantum
chemical calculations were carried out on a PGUꢀTesla multiꢀ
processor computer complex with hybrid architecture based on
4ꢀHydroxyꢀ3,4ꢀdiphenylꢀ2ꢀoxaspiro[4.5]decanꢀ1ꢀone (5a).
Yield 65%, m.p. 191—192 C. IR, /cm : 3455 (OH); 1750
–
1
1
(C=O). H NMR, : 0.74—2.25 (m, 10 H, (CH ) ); 4.69 (s, 1 H,
2
5
13
2
0 dualꢀprocessor nodes with Intel Xeon 5670 CPU and Nvidia
OH); 6.35 (s, 1 H, CHO); 7.22—7.64 (m, 10 H, Ar). C NMR,
: 20.76, 21.33, 24.67, 25.07, 31.07 (C(6)—C(10)); 51.69 (C(5));
81.26 (C(4)); 84.29 (C(3)); 126.94, 127.27, 128.16, 128.37,
128.46, 128.73, 132.98, 137.07 (Carom); 178.08 (C(1)). Found (%):
C, 78.03; H, 6.95. C H O . Calculated (%): C, 78.23; H, 6.88.
4
Tesla S2050 processors using the Firefly program package. The
Xꢀray diffraction data set for compound 5a was collected at 295(2) К
on a Xcalibur S automated singleꢀcrystal Xꢀray diffractometer
(
(
(
Oxford diffraction) using monochromatized MoꢀK radiation
0.71073 Å, graphite monochromator). Absorption was ignored
= 0.086 mm ). Colorless crystals belong to the monoclinic
21
22
3
4ꢀHydroxyꢀ3,4ꢀdiphenylꢀ2ꢀoxaspiro[4.4]nonanꢀ1ꢀone (5b).
–
1
–1
Yield 68%, m.p. 198—199 C. IR, /cm : 3450 (OH); 1755
1
system; the unit cell parameters a = 10.7285(9) Å, b = 6.4360(6) Å,
(C=O). H NMF, : 0.90—2.05 (m, 8 H, (CH ) ); 4.94 (s, 1 H,
2
4
3
13
c = 23.864(3) Å; = 90.671(8), V = 1647.6(3) Å , Z = 4, space
OH); 6.25 (s, 1 H, CHO); 7.20—7.70 (m, 10 H, Ar). C NMR,
: 24.93, 25.13, 27.69, 34.45 (C(6)—C(9)); 60.23 (C(5)); 82.62
(C(4)); 83.45 (C(3)); 127.03, 127.06, 128.38, 128.49, 128.60,
128.89, 132.94, 137.38 (Carom); 178.53 (C(1)). Found (%):
C, 77.81; H, 6.57. C H O . Calculated (%): C, 77.90; H, 6.54.
group P2 /c; a total of 3975 unique reflections were measured
1
(
Rint = 0.0678), of which 1475 reflections were with I > 2(I).
The structure solution and refinement were performed using the
5
SHELXTL program package; the final R factor was R = 0.0481
1
20 20
3
(
based on reflections with I > 2(I)). The crystallographic data
were deposited in the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre
CCDC 993240) and can be obtained, free of charge, on appliꢀ
The present work was financially supported by the Minꢀ
istry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation
(Project No. 3.3925.2011) and the Russian Foundation
for Basic Research (Project No. 13ꢀ03ꢀ96010).
(
cation to http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.
Methyl 1ꢀbromocyclohexaneꢀ and 1ꢀbromocyclopentaneꢀ
carboxylates were prepared by the successive treatment of the
corresponding cycloalkanecarboxylic acid with thionyl chloride,
6
References
bromine, and methanol. Commercial cyclopentaneꢀ and cycloꢀ
hexanecarboxylic acids and benzoin were used. Before the synꢀ
thesis, benzoin was recrystallized from ethanol. For drying, diꢀ
ethyl ether and benzene were distilled over sodium metal, and
HMPA was vacuum distilled over calcium oxide.
Synthesis of compounds 5a,b (general procedure). A solution
of methyl 1ꢀbromocyclohexaneꢀ or 1ꢀbromocyclopentanecarbꢀ
oxylate (0.025 mol) in anhydrous benzene (10 mL) was added
dropwise to a mixture of zinc chips (3 g), benzoin (0.01 mol),
a catalytic amount of mercury dichloride, anhydrous diethyl ether
1. A. Fürstner, Synthesis, 1989, 571.
2. W. R. Ocampo, W. R. Dolbier, Tetrahedron, 2004, 9325.
3. M. Gaudemar, Organomet. Chem. Rev., Sect. A, 1972, 8, 183.
4. A. Granovsky, Firefly Version 7.1 G. http://classic.chem.
msu.su/gran/firefly/index.html.
5. G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A, 2008, 64, 112.
6. C. Weygand—G. Hilgetag, Preparative Organic Chemistry,
John Wiley & Sons, New York, London—Sydney—Toronto,
1972, p. 176.
(
10 mL), anhydrous benzene (10 mL), and HMPA (2 mL). Then
the reaction mixture was refluxed for 2 h, cooled, decanted, and
hydrolyzed with 5% hydrochloric acid. The organic layer was
separated, and the aqueous layer was twice extracted with diꢀ
ethyl ether. The organic phase was dried with anhydrous sodium
Received November 25, 2013;
in revised form March 21, 2014