An Ammonium-Functionalized Cu(II) Complex
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 118, No. 50, 1996 12705
(ꢀ ) 1.21 × 10 M cm-1), 333 (ꢀ ) 1.27 × 10 ). Anal. Calcd for
4
-1
4
nitrophenyl) phosphate (BNPP), but it is only about 5 times
more reactive than related zinc complexes that do not carry
20 8
C H28CuN O14 (668.0): C, 35.91; H, 4.36; N, 16.75. Found C, 35.67;
H, 4.32; N, 16.18.
10
11
functional groups. A preliminary study revealed that the
2
2
1
[(L )Cu(NO
3
)
4
2 3 2
‚2(H O)] (2). L (NO ) (23 mg, 49 µmol) was
copper(II) compound of L has a much higher reactivity than
1
dissolved in 250 µL of water. Five hundred microliters of a Cu-
NO O stock solution (97 mM in ethanol) and 4.2 mL of dry
ethanol were added subsequently with stirring. Cooling to 5 °C for 1
(
L )Zn. Although copper(II) is not a natural cofactor of
(
3
)
2
‚3H
2
phosphodiesterase enzymes, various studies on the hydrolysis
of activated phosphodiesters and of RNA by copper(II) com-
plexes have contributed to the general understanding of metal
promoted phosphodiester hydrolysis.12,8d
h yielded green crystals which are isolated and air dried (yield 11 mg,
4
3
M
2%). UV (ethanol-water 19:1): λmax ) 321 nm (ꢀ ) 1.26 × 10
-1
-1
4
cm ), 333 (ꢀ ) 1.30 × 10 ). Anal. Calcd for C22
8
H32CuN O
14
In this paper we present a detailed kinetic study of BNPP
(696.1): C, 37.96; H, 4.63; N, 16.10. Found C, 37.79; H, 4.51; N,
15.80.
1
hydrolysis by (L )Cu together with crystallographic evidence
[(L1)
a solution of L (NO
phosphate (15 mg, 50 µmol) in 3 mL of ethanol-water (19:1) was
added with stirring Cu(NO ‚3H O (12 mg, 50 µmol). The solution
(1,3-µ-O
(OH
)
2 2
](NO
)
3 4
for bifunctional interaction of the complex with a phosphate
ester.
2
Cu
2
3
2
2
POPh) ‚2 EtOH‚2H O (3). To
(22 mg, 50 µmol) and disodium phenyl
1
3 2
)
)
3 2
2
Experimental Section
was allowed to stand for 2 h. Bright blue X-ray quality crystals were
obtained. The solvent was decanted, and the product was washed with
few diethyl ether and air dried (yield 19.6 mg, 52%). Anal. Calcd for
General Information. All reagents unless otherwise indicated were
of analytical grade and were used without further purification. Etha-
nol-water solvent mixtures were prepared from absolute ethanol and
ultrapure water. 2,4,6-Trimethylpyridine was distilled before use. pH
measurements in ethanol-water 19:1 (v/v) were performed with a
combined glass electrode calibrated with aqueous buffers and were
reproducible within (0.05 units. The pH values given in this work
correspond to pH meter reading + 0.8. This correction value was
obtained by extrapolation of literature data for ethanol-water mix-
C
56
H78Cu
N
2 12
O
26
P
2
(1524.3): C, 44.16; H, 5.16; N, 11.03. Found C,
43.21; H, 4.85; N, 10.95.
3 2
Spectrophotometric Titration. A solution of the ligand (L (NO )
1
2
3 2
or L (NO ) , respectively, 50 µM) and sodium diphenyl phosphate (100
mM) was prepared in ethanol-water 19:1 (v/v). The pH of the solution
was adjusted to 6.6 with NaOH in ethanol-water 19:1. Appropriate
amounts of a Cu(NO
19:1) were added with stirring. Immediately after addition of metal
salt a UV spectrum of the solution was taken at 20 °C, and the pH was
readjusted to 6.6 when necessary. The absorbance at 333 nm was
3
)
2
‚3H O stock solution (5 mM in ethanol-water
2
1
3
tures. EPR spectra were recorded on a Bruker ESP 300 X-band
spectrometer using ethanol-water 19:1 glasses at 77 K. UV-vis spectra
were measured on a Shimadzu UV 3100 spectrometer.
1
2+
6
,6′-Bis(3-dimethylaminopropynyl)-2,2′-bipyridine (L -2 H) and
corrected for the weak absorbance of Cu ions in the absence of ligand
1
were prepared by previously reported methods.10
2
-1
-1
L (NO
3
)
2
under the same conditions (ꢀ333 ) 3.6 × 10 M cm ). An isosbestic
point at ca. 313 nm was found when data were corrected for the
6
,6′-Bis(3-trimethylammoniopropynyl)-2,2′-bipyridine dinitrate
2
-1
-1
2
). 6,6′-Bis(3-dimethylaminopropynyl)-2,2′-bipyridine10 (200
3 2
)
absorbance of excess Cu (ꢀ313 ) 7.0 × 10
constants were calculated by fitting the increase in 333 nm absorbance
for Cu:L ratios > 1 to a 1:1 complex formation model, using ꢀ333
M
cm ). Stability
(
L (NO
mg, 0.63 mmol) was dissolved in 50 mL of acetonitrile. A solution
containing CH I (0.39 mL, 6.3 mmol) in 5 mL of acetonitrile was added
)
3
4
1
4
2
1
.27 × 10 for (L )Cu and ꢀ333 ) 1.30 × 10 for (L )Cu (the free
dropwise with stirring. After 15 min the white precipitate was
centrifuged off and washed with 20 mL of acetonitrile. The product
was suspended in 50 mL of ethanol, and 12.6 mL of a 0.10 M aqueous
ligands do not absorb at this wavelength).
1
pH Titration. A solution of L (NO
3
)
2
or 1 (5 mM), respectively,
AgNO
3
solution was added with stirring. After 0.5 h the precipitate
containing sodium diphenyl phosphate (100 mM), was prepared in
ethanol-water 19:1 (v/v). Aliquots (50 µL) of a CO -free NaOH
was removed by filtration and washed with 20 mL of ethanol. Filtrate
2
and washing solution were combined and reduced to dryness in Vacuo.
solution (50 mM) in ethanol-water 19:1 were added with stirring. The
pH was measured with a glass electrode and read after 30 s equilibration
time.
1
The white residue was dried in vacuo for 5 h (172 mg, yield 58%). H
NMR (D
2
O, 300 MHz): δ 3.51 (18 H, s, CH
.98 (2 H, d, J ) 7.6 Hz, bpy-H), 8.26 (2 H, t, J ) 7.9 Hz, bpy-H),
.33 (2 H, d, J ) 8.1 Hz, bpy-H). UV (ethanol-water 19:1): λmax
3 2
), 4.76 (4 H, s, CH ),
7
8
2
Kinetics. Reaction solutions were prepared by combining appropri-
1
2
)
ate amounts of ligand (L (NO
3
)
2
, L (NO
3
)
2
, or bpy), Cu(NO
)
3 2
2
‚3H O
4
-1
-1
97 nm (ꢀ ) 1.76 × 10 M cm ). Anal. Calcd for C22
H
28
N
6
O
6
(stock solution in ethanol), 2,4,6-trimethylpyridinium bis(p-nitrophenyl)-
phosphate (200 mM stock solution in ethanol, 1:1 mixture of 2,4,6-
trimethylpyridine and bis(p-nitrophenyl)phosphoric acid) and 2,4,6-
trimethylpyridinium nitrate. The final composition of solvent mixture
was ethanol-water 19:1 (v/v). It was not possible to perform the kinetic
experiments in the presence of excess (>0.3 M) standard electrolytes
(472.5): C, 55.92; H, 5.97; N, 17.78. Found: C, 55.30; H, 6.11; N,
1
8.20.
[
1
1
(L )Cu(NO
dissolved in a mixture of 250 µL of water and 3.6 mL of dry ethanol.
A stock solution (1.18 mL) of Cu(NO ‚3H O (40 mM in ethanol)
)
3 4
‚2(H
2 3 2
O)] (1). L (NO ) (22 mg, 50 µmol) was
3
)
2
2
was added with stirring. The green solution was allowed to stand at
room temperature for 2 h. Green crystals of 1 were isolated and air
dried (yield 19 mg, 56%). UV (ethanol-water 19:1): λmax ) 322 nm
(e.g., NaClO
4 3
, NaNO ) owing to precipitate formation. To achieve a
constant ionic strength (I ≈ 0.1 M) the 2,4,6-trimethylpyridinium salts
of bis(p-nitrophenyl)phosphate and nitrate, respectively, were combined
such that the total salt concentration was 100 mM in all reaction
solutions. The reaction was initiated by adjusting the desired pH by
addition of NaOH solution in ethanol-water 19:1. This does not result
in a change of ionic strength since the 2,4,6-trimethylpyridinium cation
(
(
10) K o¨ v a´ ri, E.; Kr a¨ mer, R. Chem. Ber. 1994, 127, 2151-2157.
11) K o¨ v a´ ri, E.; Heitker, J.; Kr a¨ mer, R. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1
995, 1205-1206.
(
12) (a) Morrow, J. R., Trogler, W. C. Inorg. Chem. 1988, 27, 3387-
+
1
is replaced by Na . For the pH-rate-profiles shown for (L )Cu and
(
3
394. (b) Stern, M. K.; Bashkin, J. K.; Sall, E. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990,
2
+
L )Cu (Figure 6) the Na /2,4,6-trimethylpyridinium ratio increases with
1
12, 5357-5359. (c) Modak, A. S.; Gard, J. K.; Merriman, M. C.; Winkeler,
K. A.; Bashkin, J. K.; Stern, M. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 283-
2
increasing pH. In a control experiment 2,4,6-trimethylpyridine was
used instead of NaOH to adjust pH 6.3; the same hydrolysis rates were
determined. This observation rules out that reactivity is significantly
affected by medium effects. In the absence of buffer, initial rates
appeared to be similar to those in the buffered reaction solutions, but
accurate data were difficult to obtain since the rate readily decreases
owing to a decrease in pH.
At pH < 6.6 in ethanol-water 19:1 (v/v) p-nitrophenol does in effect
not dissociate into p-nitrophenolate and protons. To detect the increase
in p-nitrophenol concentration in the reaction solutions (10 mL), at
least five 0.1 ml samples were taken in appropriate time intervals and
mixed with 3 mL of 40 mM NaOH solution in ethanol-water (2:3)
91. (d) Bashkin, J. K.; Jenkins, L. A. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1993,
631-3632. (e) Burstyn, J. N.; Deal, K. A. Inorg. Chem. 1993, 32, 3585.
3
(f) Wall, M.; Hynes, R. C.; Chin, J. Angew. Chem. 1993, 105, 1696-1697;
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 1633-1634. (g) Wahnon, D.; Hynes,
R. C.; Chin, J. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994, 1441-1442. (h)
Linkletter, B.; Chin, J. Angew. Chem. 1995, 107, 529-531; Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 472-474. (i) Young, M. J.; Chin, J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1995, 117, 10577-10578. (j) Deal, K. A., Burstyn, J. N. Inorg. Chem.
1
996, 35, 2792-2798. (k) Deal, K. A.; Hengge, A. C.; Burstyn, J. N. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 1713-1718.
13) (a) Bates, R. G. Determination of pH, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons:
(
New York, 1964; pp 226-227. (b) Galster, H. pH Messung; VCH:
Weinheim, 1990; pp 60-61, 243-244.