Alkylcobalt(III) Phthalocyanine Complexes
five-coordinate (or pseudo-five-coordinate) RCoIIIPc units in
a face-to-face dimer is of interest with regard to the SN2
reactivity of alkylcobalt(III) phthalocyanine complexes.
balamine chemistry being an obvious reason. Excessively
large bond dissociation energies (BDEs) and the resulting
inconveniently slow rates may have been another reason
for the scarcity of data on the homolytic cleavage of the
Co-(primary alkyl) systems, with simple primary alkyls such
as methyl or ethyl. In addition, â-hydrogen-containing alkyls,
such as ethyl, could have been avoided because of possible
in-cage â-H elimination. For the methyl-cobalt system, apart
from BDE values for the homolysis of MeCbl18 and its
popular model, CH3Co(DH)2(py),19 and some kinetic data
on CH3Co[TC-(4,4)],5 there is probably only one report on
the homolysis of σ-bonded methylcobalt(III) porphyrinic
model20 and one regarding the thermolysis of CH3CoIIIPc
under aerobic conditions.21
The structural data for σ-bonded alkyl-Co(III) octaeth-
ylporphyrins reported by Stolzenberg et al.6,7 set the stage
for interesting comparisons with their phthalocyanine con-
geners. While phthalocyanine complexes have the most
electron-deficient equatorial arrangement among porphyrinic
models, the octaalkylporphyrin compounds are just the
opposite. Octaalkylporphyrins (H2P) are ∼15 pKa units less
acidic than phthalocyanines.11 Another striking feature of
phthalocyanine complexes, consistent with their electron
deficiency, are their redox potentials, which are considerably
less negative than those for octaalkylporphyrins. For instance,
Co(II)/Co(I) potentials are -0.2 or -0.35 12 and -0.95 V13
vs SCE for phthalocyanine and octaethylporphyrin com-
pounds, respectively. Bond length and strength of the axial
system in alkylcobalt(III) complexes are a central problem
in bioinorganic chemistry. It appears that long Co-C bonds
coincide with a long trans Co-Nax bond. This unique feature
of the alkyl-Co-N axial system, known as inverse trans
influence, has recently gained much interest. Molecular
mechanics studies,14 as well as DFT calculations,15 aimed
at reproducing the structural data, and with less success, the
BDEs have been mostly conducted on corrinoids having
various axial ligands. The cis influence of the equatorial
system has received less attention. Riordan and Halpern noted
that, in closely related organoiron porphyrin complexes, the
metal-carbon bond dissociation is faster when the equatorial
ligand is less basic.16 Similar conclusions were derived by
Qiu and Sawyer from their electrochemical studies on iron
and cobalt porphyrins.17 No correlation of these observations
with the bond distances could be attempted because the
needed structural data are not available. A comparison of
the structural data for five-coordinate RCo(OEP) and RCoPc
complexes with equatorial ligands of sharply contrasting
basicity, as well as pyridine adducts with CH3CoPc and
CH3Co(OEP), should provide some insight into the scale of
the possible cis electronic influence.
A variety of alkylcobalt model complexes have been
synthesized and extensively studied. The phthalocyanine
model of MeCbl is unique in its outstanding methyl donor
ability. It is interesting to see if this atypical reactivity will
be reflected to any appreciable extent in the structural
parameters of the coordination sphere as well in the Co-C
bond dissociation energies. As follows from Marcus theory,
small BDEs should contribute to lowering the intrinsic free-
+
22
energy barrier for methyl (CH3 ) transfer.
Hence, a
comparison of the BDE values for inactive methyl donors,
such as methylcobaloxime or MeCbl, and reactive CH3CoPc
is of interest.
The alkyl group effect (Me > Et) has been demon-
strated to be a characteristic feature of the SN2 reactions of
RCoIIIPc complexes,9 in (anticipated) contrast to Et > Me,
for the homolytic cleavage. In this work, the faster homolysis
of CH3CH2CoIIIPc than that of CH3CoIIIPc is documented.
The homolysis data are also of interest because of the
possible correlation between structural parameters of the axial
system and the rates of homolysis. Rigid porphyrinic
models,23,24 with nonbulky axial alkyl groups, in which steric
trans influence is minimal and electronic effects can be more
easily observed, have not attracted as much attention as they
deserve. Further studies of these systems seem warranted.
Experimental Section
Materials. CH3CoIIIPc and CH3CH2CoIIIPc were prepared as
described earlier,9 and their solutions were handled at dim light.
All chemicals were purchased from Aldrich. Pyridine and toluene
were purified by standard methods. Double-distilled N-methylimi-
dazole was used as received. Dimethylacetamide (DMA) was
purified and handled as described elsewhere.9
Crystal Growth. X-ray quality crystals of CH3CH2CoIIIPc
were obtained by ethanol vapor infusion into a DMA solution of
the complex, which had been flash chromatographed on a SiO2-
packed column using DMA as the eluant. All manipulations were
Most of the literature data on the homolysis of the Co-C
bond relate to bulky axial alkyls, relevance to adenosylco-
(11) Stuzhin, P. A.; Khelevina, O. G.; Berezin, B. D. In Phthalocyanines.
Properties and Applications; Leznoff, C. C., Lever A. B. P., Eds.;
Wiley-VCH: New York, 1996; Vol. 4, Chapter 2.
(12) Lever, A. B. P.; Milaeva, E. R.; Speier, G. In Phthalocyanines.
Properties and Applications; Leznoff, C. C., Lever A. B. P., Eds.;
Wiley-VCH: New York, 1993; Vol. 3, Chapter 1, p 47.
(13) Zhou, D.-L.; Gao, J.; Rusling, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117,
1127.
(14) Sirovatka, J. M.; Rappe´, A. K.; Finke, R. G. Inorg. Chim. Acta. 2000,
300-302, 545. (b) Brown, K. L.; Marques, H. M. J. Inorg. Biochem.
2001, 83, 121.
(15) Jensen, K. P.; Ryde, U. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 7539. (b) Jensen,
K. P.; Ryde, U. THEOCHEM 2002, 585, 239. (c) Jensen, K. P.; Sauer,
S. P. A.; Liljefors, T.; Norrby, P.-O. Organometallics 2001, 20, 550.
(d) Friendorf, M.; Kozlowski, P. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
1928. (e) Andriuniow, T.; Zgierski, M. Z.; Kozlowski, P. M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 2679. (f) Andriuniow, T.; Zgierski, M. Z.;
Kozlowski, P. M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 10921. (g) Do¨lker, N.;
Maseras, F.; Lledo´s, A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 306.
(16) Riordan, C. G.; Halpern, J. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1996, 243, 19.
(17) Qiu, A.; Sawyer, D. T. J. Porphyrins Phthalocyanines 1997, 1, 125.
(18) Martin, B. D.; Finke, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 585.
(19) Toscano, P. J.; Seligson, A. L.; Curran, M. T.; Skrobutt, A. T.;
Sonnenberger, D. C. Inorg. Chem. 1989, 28, 166.
(20) Fukuzumi, S.; Miyamoto, K.; Suenobu, T.; Van Caemelbecke, E.;
Kadish, K. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 2880.
(21) Galezowski, W.; Ibrahim, P. N.; Lewis, E. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993,
115, 8660.
(22) See eq 12 in Marcus, R. A. J. Phys. Chem. A 1997, 101, 4072.
(23) Geno, M. K.; Halpern, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 1238.
(24) Kaplan, W. A.; Scott, R. A.; Suslick, K. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990,
112, 1283.
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 44, No. 26, 2005 9903