CF3COSH and CF3CSOH.30 Carbon disulfide was reported to
react with Me3SiCF3.31
5 S. P. Kotun, J. D. O. Anderson and D. D. DesMarteau, J. Org. Chem.,
1992, 57, 1124.
6 J. Wiedemann, T. Heiner, G. Mloston, G. K. S. Prakash and G. A. Olah,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1998, 37, 820.
7 A. A. Kolomeitsev, V. N. Movchun, N. V. Kondratenko and Y. L.
Yagupolski, Synthesis, 1990, 1155.
8 R. P. Singh, R. L. Kirchmeier and J. M. Shreeve, J. Org. Chem., 1999,
64, 2579.
The present report describes a powerful and simple method
for the preparation of several fluorinated compounds with some
advantages in comparison with some other routes.
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation
(Grant No. CHE-9720365) and by the Petroleum Research
Fund, administered by ACS.
9 R. P. Singh, G. Cao, R. L. Kirchmeier and J. M. Shreeve, J. Org. Chem.,
1999, 64, 2873.
10 Organofluorine Chemistry: Principles and Commercial Applications,
eds. R. E. Banks, B. E. Smart and J. C. Tatlow, Plenum, New York,
1994.
Notes and references
† Caesium fluoride (0.30 g, 2.0 mmol) and ethylene glycol dimethyl ether
(1 mL) were added in a dry flask (100 mL), cooled to 2196 °C. The flask
was evacuated to remove any air or nitrogen gas. NOCl (2.0 mmol) was
transferred under vacuum followed by the condensation of Me3SiCF3 (2.0
mmol) at 2196 °C. The cold bath was removed. The formation of the blue
gas (CF3NO) commenced shortly after the reaction reached 25 °C. The
reaction mixture was stirred for 3 h. Based on the gas phase IR, all of the
NOCl was consumed. CF3NO was separated from other volatile compounds
by trap-to-trap distillation. It was isolated in 92% yield. Product was
characterized by comparing the spectroscopic data reported in the
literature.19 C2F5NO was prepared in the similar way in 85% isolated
yield.20
11 Biomedical Frontiers of Fluorine Chemistry, eds. I. Ojima, J. R.
McCarthy and J. T. Welch, ACS Symposium Series 639; American
Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1996.
12 Organic Chemistry in Medicinal Chemistry and Biomedical Applica-
tions, ed. R. Filler, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1993.
13 J. T. Welch and S. Eswaraksrishnan, Fluorine in Bioorganic Chemistry,
John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1991.
14 R. Filler and K. Kirk, Biological Properties of Fluorinated Compounds
inChemistry of Organic Fluorine Compounds II: A Critical Review, eds.
M. Hudlicky and A. E. Pavlath, ACS Monograph 187; American
Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1995, pp. 1011.
15 Recent Developments in Fluorine-Containing AgrochemicalsinOrgano-
fluorine Chemistry: Principles and Commercial Applications, eds. R. E.
Banks, B. E. Smart and J. C. Tatlow, Plenum, New York, 1994, pp.
237.
16 R. W. Lang, Fluorinated AgrochemicalsinChemistry of Organic
Fluorine Compounds II; eds. M. Hudlicky and A. E. Pavlath, ACS
Monograph 187; American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1995,
pp. 1143.
17 D. A. Barr and R. N. Haszeldine, J. Chem. Soc., 1955, 1881.
18 R. N. Haszeldine, Nature, 1951, 168, 1028.
19 J. Jander and R. N. Haszeldine, J. Chem. Soc., 1954, 912.
20 R. N. Haszeldine, J. Chem. Soc., 1953, 2075.
21 J. Banus, Nature, 1953, 171, 173.
‡ In general, caesium fluoride was added in a flask and 1.5 equiv. of
Me3SiRf was added at 2196 °C followed by monoglyme. The mixture was
evacuated and 1.5 equiv. of sulfur dioxide were added. After warming
slowly to 25 °C the reaction mixture was stirred for 24 h. Removal of
volatile materials at reduced pressure gave the caesium salt of per-
fluoroalkylated sulfinic acids. CF3SO22Cs+: Yield, 95%; IR (nujol mull):
1260, 1219, 1190, 1121, 1026, 945, 801 cm21
285.63 (s); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): d 125.5 (q, JC–F
C2F5SO22Cs+: Yield, 95%; IR (nujol mull): 1262, 1163, 1132, 1083, 1022,
.
19F NMR (DMSO-d6): d
=
360 Hz);
958, 801, 723 cm21
.
19F NMR (DMSO-d6): d 278.17 (s, 3F), 2131.91 (s,
2F); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): d 120.3 (triplet of quartets, JC–F = 287.5 Hz,
JC–C–F = 34 Hz).
§ Prepared by the similar procedure as used for SO2 reaction.
22 J. Banus, J. Chem. Soc., 1953, 3775.
23 R. E. Banks, M. G. Barlow, R. N. Haszeldine and M. K. McCreath, J.
Chem. Soc., 1966, 1350.
CF3COO2Cs+: Yield: 95%. IR (nujol mull): 1665, 1456, 1417, 1205, 1228,
984, 828, 801, 720 cm21 19F NMR (DMSO-d6): d 273.35 (s, 3F); 13C
.
NMR (DMSO-d6): d 122.7 (q, JC–F = 293 Hz, CF3COO); 164.3 (q, JC–C–F
= 37.5 Hz, CF3COO). To the salt was added an equimolar amount of
anhydrous HCl and after the flask was agitated for 1 h, CF3COOH was
separated in 90% yield by distillation from caesium chloride and
characterized by comparing the spectroscopic data with authentic samples.
C2F5COO2Cs+: Yield: 95%. IR (nujol mull): 1689, 1455, 1366, 1322, 1195,
24 K. Ludovici, D. Naumann, G. Siegmund, W. Tyrra, H.-G. Varbelow and
H. Wrubel, J. Fluorine Chemistry, 1995, 73, 273.
25 H. W. Roesky, H. Niederpruem and M. Wechsberg, Ger. Offen. 2, 1973,
148, 597.
26 J. C. Folest, J. Y. Nedelec and J. Perichon, Synth. Commun., 1988, 18,
1491.
27 H. W. Roesky, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1971, 10, 810.
28 Nucleophilic Perfluoroalkylation of Organic Compounds Using Per-
fluoroalkyltrialkylsilanesinSynthetic Fluorine, eds. G. A. Olah, R. D.
Chamber and G. K. S. Prakash, John Wiley, New York, 1992, pp.
227.
1113, 1024, 984, 935, 806, 730 cm21
.
19F NMR (DMSO-d6): d 281.30 (s,
3F), 2118.10 (s, 2F); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): d 114.7 (quartet of troplet, 2F,
JC–F = 262 Hz, CF3CF2, JC–C–F, 37.5 Hz, = CF3CF2); 125.0 (triplet of
quartet, 3F, JC–F = 285 Hz, CF3CF2, JC–C–F, 37.5 Hz, CF3CF2, 163.8 (q,
JC–C–F = 22.5 Hz, CF3CF2COO).
29 H. W. Roesky and J. Holtschneider, J. Fluorine Chemistry, 1976, 7,
77.
1 G. K. S. Prakash and A. K. Yudin, Chem. Rev., 1997, 97, 757.
2 R. P. Singh and J. M. Shreeve, Tetrahedron, 2000, 56, 7613.
3 R. Krishnamurti, D. R. Bellew and G. K. S. Prakash, J. Org. Chem.,
1994, 56, 984.
4 D. W. Nelson, N. J. O’Reilly, J. Speier and P. G. Gassman, J. Org.
Chem., 1994, 59, 8157.
30 W. A. Sheppard and E. L. Muetterties, J. Org. Chem., 1960, 25, 180.
31 Y. L. Yagupolskii, V. N. Movchun, N. V. Kirij, D. Naumann, N.
Magiarosa and W. Tyrra, 16th International Symposium Fluorine
Chemistry, University of Durham, UK, July 16–21, 2000, Abstract No.
A38.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2002, 1818–1819
1819