Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
Y. Sun et al. / Tetrahedron 65 (2009) 3480–3485
3481
O
N
O
N
O
N
NO2
Cl
NO2
NO2
NO2
H
H
H
NO2
1
NO2
2
NO2
3
O
N
O
N
O
N
NO2
NO2
NO2
NO2
H
H
H
NO2
4
6
5
Scheme 1. The chemosensors evaluated in this study.
2. Results and discussion
2.1. Synthesis and crystal structure
Figure 2, compound 1 displayed an obvious absorption at 441 nm,
giving a yellow solution in 9:1 DMSO–H2O. However, with further
increase of water, the absorption band fades along with a blue shift,
giving a pale yellow solution. In 1:1 DMSO–H2O (v/v), the absorp-
tion band completely disappeared, giving an almost colorless
solution.
The synthesis of these receptors is straightforward. Treatment of
4-substituted benzoyl chloride with corresponding aromatic
amines in CH2Cl2 in the presence of triethylamine afforded the
objective compounds (1–5). A control compound (6) was also
synthesized according to the same procedures. All of the com-
pounds were characterized by NMR, IR, and MS spectroscopy, and
elemental analysis. Crystal of receptor 1 suitable for X-ray crystal-
lography was also obtained on slow evaporation of MeOH solution
of 1. In an attempt to characterize the conformation, the crystal
structure of 1 was determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction, as
shown in Figure 1. The most interesting feature of the structure is
the coplanarity of amided2,4-dinitrophenyl unit, indicating the
optimal conformation for ICT process resulting from the de-
localization of electron on the nitrogen of amide group toward
electron-withdrawing 2,4-dinitrophenyl unit.
We speculate that the color change of 1 observed in the mixture
of DMSO–H2O should be originated from a deprotonated species
due to an acidic ionization, that is, the corresponding anion of 1,
which enhanced the charge-transfer interactions between the
electron-rich donor unit and the electron-deficient 2,4-dini-
trophenyl moiety, resulting in a visible color change. The assump-
tion could be supported by the following facts: upon addition of
acid, such as TsOH or HCl, to the mixture of 9:1 DMSO–H2O solution
of 1, the absorption at 441 nm disappears; however, upon addition
of base, such as Et3N or NaOH, to the mixture of 1:1 DMSO–H2O
solution of 1, the strong absorption at 405 nm is observed (see Figs.
S1 and S2). It appears that water plays a key role in inhibiting the
acidic ionization of 1, as shown in 1:1 DMSO–H2O. While the de-
tailed mechanism on water effect is plausible at present, the feature
has been utilized by us to sense cyanide with high selectivity.
Next, in order to gain systematic knowledge on the effect of
water on the binding affinity and selectivity for cyanide, we chose
DMSO–H2O mixtures as solvents (9:1, 7:3, and 1:1 of DMSO–H2O
(v/v), respectively) and various anions of present interest, namely,
CNꢀ, Fꢀ, Clꢀ, Brꢀ, Iꢀ, ClO4ꢀ, AcOꢀ, H2PO4ꢀ, NO3ꢀ, and Nꢀ3 as their so-
dium salts were added to the solution of 1, respectively. The cor-
responding absorption spectra upon addition of different anions in
DMSO–H2O mixtures are shown in Figure 3. In 9:1 DMSO–H2O,
compound 1 displayed a strong absorption band at 441 nm, and
CNꢀ, Fꢀ, and AcOꢀ showed slight effect to the band, whereas less
basic anions such as Clꢀ, Brꢀ, Iꢀ, ClOꢀ4 , H2POꢀ4 , NO3ꢀ, and Nꢀ3 showed
less or no effect (Fig. 3a). In 7:3 DMSO–water, only CNꢀ, Fꢀ, and
AcOꢀ showed obvious interaction with the sensor 1 (Fig. 3b), but,
the selectivity for CNꢀ was rather poor due to the interference of Fꢀ
and AcOꢀ. However, to our delight, a remarkably higher selectivity
for CNꢀ over the other anions were obtained in 1:1 DMSO–H2O, and
other anions tested did not cause any significant changes in the
absorption intensity, even at a concentration of 100 equiv of guests
(Fig. 3c).
2.2. UV–vis titration studies of compound 1
The UV–vis absorption is one of the most interesting output
signals not only because the instrumentation is widely available,
but also because it would be possible to sense target species with
the naked eye. In order to obtain the systematic knowledge on the
photochemical properties of these sensing systems in solution and
to estimate the possible absorption mechanism, we first studied the
absorption spectra of 1 in various DMSO–H2O mixtures [9:1, 8:2,
7:3, 6:4, and 1:1 of DMSO–H2O (v/v), respectively]. As shown in
The above results indicate that the selectivity for CNꢀ is greatly
influenced by water. In 1:1 DMSO–H2O, anions such as Fꢀ and AcOꢀ
could interact with the aqueous medium through H-bonding, and
this salvation leads to a decrease in their basicity, thus, resulting in
the poor deprotonation reaction. In contrast, cyanide has much
weaker H-bonding ability in comparison with Fꢀ and AcOꢀ but has
stronger carbonyl carbon affinity, which results in the addition
reaction of CNꢀ to carbonyl carbon. Subsequent proton transfer of
amide hydrogen to the developing alkoxide anion of 1 produces an
active state (its anionic state) of 1, which enhanced the charge-
transfer interactions between the electron-rich and electron-
Figure 1. The single crystal X-ray structure of sensor 1.