Communications
the direct radiation–water interaction, that is, to the direct
K. F. Cassidy, J. Phys. Chem. 1988, 92, 4680; e) N. J. Turro, S.
Jockusch, X. G. Lei, J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 5779.
2]N. J. Turro, Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 637.
production of hydroxyl radicals in water. On the other hand,
the intercept is linked to an overproduction of oxidative
species at the water/silica interface. Such an overproduction
can be associated with energy transfer from the oxide to the
[
[
3]a) J. Ahn, R. Kopelman, P. Argyrakis, J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110,
2116; b) A. L. Lin, R. Kopelman, P. Argyrakis, Phys. Rev. E 1997,
56, 6204; c) A. L. Lin, R. Kopelman, P. Argyrakis, J. Phys. Chem.
[
20]
adsorbed water. As expected, this energy transfer is more
efficient for materials with a large specific surface area, that is,
for smaller pores. Therefore, the contribution of water to the
production of HOC radicals can be separated from the surface
contribution. A more accurate determination of the effects of
confinement on 7-OHC production inside the pores can be
obtained by subtracting the surface contribution. When this is
done for the data in Figures 2 and 3b, the amount of HOC
available for reaction with coumarin is decreases by a factor
of almost 6 for 8 nm pores and by a factor of 1.5 for 50 nm
pores with respect to the amount for 300 nm pores.
A 1997, 101, 802; d) A. L. Lin, R. Kopelman, P. Argyrakis, Phys.
Rev. E 1996, 54, R5893.
[4]a) P. Hunt, D. R. Worrall, F. Wilkinson, S. N. Batchelor, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 8532; b) S. N. Batchelor, A. I. Shushin, J.
Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 3405.
[
[
[
5]S. C. Chemirisov, A. D. Trifunac, Chem. Phys. Lett. 2001, 347, 65.
6]J. K. Thomas, Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 301.
7]J. W. T. Spinks, R. J. Woods, An Introduction to Radiation
Chemistry, 3rd ed., Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1990.
[8]a) W. A. Armstrong, R. A. Facey, D. W. Grant, W. G. Hum-
phreys, Can. J. Chem. 1963, 41, 1575; b) W. A. Armstrong, D. W.
Grant, Nature 1958, 182, 747.
9]a) R. W. Matthews, Radiat. Res. 1980, 83, 27; b) J. C. Baretto,
G. S. Smith, N. H. P. Strobel, P. A. McQuillin, T. A. Miller, Life
Sci. 1995, 54, 89; c) X. Fang, G. Mark, C. von Sonntag, Ultrason.
Sonochem. 1996, 3, 57.
[
To explain this effect, we must take into account that the
quantity of 7-OHC produced is the result of competition
between recombination of radiolytic radicals and their
capture by coumarin. In the 8 nm pores the hydroxyl radicals
cannot migrate as far apart as in bulk water, and thus they
recombine faster with radicals produced in the same radio-
lytic track than they can react with a solute such as
[10]G. Louit, S. Foley, J. Cabillic, H. Coffigny, F. Taran, A. Valleix,
J. P. Renault, S. Pin, Rad. Phys. Chem., in press.
[
11]G. M. Makrigiorgos, J. Baranowska-Kortylewicz, E. Bump, S. K.
Sahu, R. M. Berman, A. I. Kassis, Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 1993, 63,
445.
12]S. C. Ashawa, U. R. Kini, U. Madhvanath, Int. J. Appl. Radiat.
Isot. 1979, 30, 7.
13]K. Gopakumar, U. R. Kini, S. C. Ashawa, N. S. Bhandari, G. U.
Krishnan, D. Krishnan, Radiat. Eff. 1977, 32, 199.
[14]J. A. R. Mead, J. N. Smith, R. T. Williams, Biochem. J. 1958, 68,
[
21]
coumarin. This recombination is reminiscent of the recom-
binations of both the primary and secondary geminate radical
pairs resulting from photolysis of ketones in the “void space”
of MFI zeolites, although the diameters of the cylindrical
channels and their spherical intersections are smaller (5.5 and
[
[
[
2]
61.
9
, respectively). This acceleration of the reaction induced
[
[
15]W. Haller, Nature 1965, 206, 693.
by confinement has been theoretically described by Tachiya in
16]A table listing pore size distributions and mean values for the
various materials used, a SEM image of CPG 300 nm, and
experimental details are available as Supporting Information.
[17]A. K. Collins, G. M. Makrigiorgos, G. K. Svenson, Med. Phys.
1994, 21, 1741.
18]M. Suh, P. S. Bagus, S. Pak, M. P. Rosynek, J. H. Lunsford, J.
Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 2736.
19]a) M. Rovere, P. Gallo, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2003, 15, S145;
b) P. Gallo, M. Rapinesi, M. Rovere, J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117,
[
22]
micelles.
From this model, such cage effects are not
expected to be effective for pore sizes as large as 50 nm. A
complementary explanation for the observed results can be
provided by the model of Barzykin and Tachiya which was
[
23]
[
developed for gels.
In porous media, reactions on long
timescales are expected to be slowed down by local depletion
and impaired diffusion, especially for low concentrations of
reactants. We assume that this slowing down of the capture of
HOC radicals by coumarin can explain part of the decrease in
radiolytic yield of 7-OHC in porous glasses.
These results show that the effects of confinement, clearly
identified at the nanopore scale, are important even at the
mesopore scale, and this suggests the need to completely
reevaluate our knowledge of reactivity in this type of
environment. Experiments are underway to better under-
stand the effects of confinement on the rates of radical
reactions.
[
369; c) P. Gallo, M. A. Ricci, M. Rovere, J. Chem. Phys. 2002,
116, 342.
[20]a) J. A. LaVerne, L. Tandon, J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 13623;
b) J. A. LaVerne, L. Tandon, J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 380;
c) N. G. Petrik, A. B. Alexandrov, A. I. Vall, J. Phys. Chem. B
2001, 105, 5935.
[
21]A simple way to understand the confinement effect of 8 nm
pores is to evaluate whether HOC reacts with coumarin before
À9
2 À1
reaching the pore wall. Taking D = 2.3 10 m s for the
diffusion constant of HOC (G. V. Buxton, C. L. Greenstock, W. P.
Helman, A. B. Ross, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1988, 17, 513) one
can estimate the average time needed for a hydroxyl radical to
reach the pore wall as 5 ns. If the reaction constant between
hydroxyl radical and coumarin is taken as k = 8.2
Received: April 9, 2004
Revised: September 6, 2004
9
À1
3 À1
1
0 mol dm s (K. Gopakumar, U. R. Kini, S. C. Ashawa,
N. S. Bhandari, G. U. Krishnan, D. Krishnan, Radiat. Eff. 1977,
Keywords: confinement effects · fluorescence spectroscopy ·
mesoporous materials · radical reactions · radiolysis
À3
3
.
32, 199) the half-life of HOC in 10 moldm coumarin solution is
about 85 ns. According to this analysis, confinement in 8 nm
pores can effectively prevent diffusion of HOC out of their
production site and increase their recombination with their
parent radicals prior to reaction with coumarin.
[
1]a) N. K. Mal, M. Fujiwara, Y. Tanaka, Nature 2003, 421, 350;
b) P. J. A. Kenis, R. F. Ismagilov, G. M. Whitesides, Science 1999,
[
[
22]M. Tachiya in Kinetics of Nonhomogeneous Processes (Ed.:
G. R. Freeman), Wiley, New York, 1987, p. 575.
23]A. V. Barzykin, M. Tachiya, J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 2953.
2
1
85, 83; c) B. H. Barretz, N. J. Turro, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983,
05, 1309; d) J. M. Drake, P. Levitz, N. J. Turro, K. S. Nitsche,
1
12
ꢀ 2005 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 110 –112