6
756
C. Wang et al. / Electrochimica Acta 55 (2010) 6755–6760
electrode was polished with 0.05-m alumina and then washed
by sonication for 2 min in purified water. The electrolyte solution
was deaerated by purging with pure argon for 10 min before each
experiment.
2.3. Analytical methods
The DMP concentration was analyzed by HPLC (Techcomp, LC
130, Shanghai, China) equipped with a reverse phase column
2
(
Phenomenex® C18, 5 m, 150 mm × 4.6 mm) and a UV detector.
The mobile phase was comprised of 30% acetonitrile and 70% water
containing 0.5% tetrabutylammonium bromide, and the detec-
tion wavelength was 276 nm. The flow rate of mobile phase was
−
1
1
mL min and the sample volume injected was 25 L. The qual-
itative identification of PW11Fe (III) (H O ) was also performed
2
2
using the same HPLC under the same conditions mentioned-above.
Cumulative H O2 concentrations were measured by spectropho-
2
tometric method based on the pink Ti(IV)-H O2 complex [23,24]
2
using a TU1810 UV–vis spectrophotometer (Universal Analysis,
Beijing, China). TOC concentrations were measured using a Shi-
madzu 5000A analyzer.
Fig. 1. The spatial structure of the PW11O39Fe(III) (H2O)4− anion.
reagent grade and were used as received. D301R anion exchange
resin was purchased from Nankai University (China). The Keggin
heteropolytungstate Na7PW11O39 and iron-substituted het-
3. Results and discussion
3.1. DMP degradation
eropolytungstate Na PW11O39Fe(III) (H O) were synthesized as
4
2
described in the literature [2,22]. Fig. 1 shows the spatial structure
PW11Fe(III)(H O) has been proved to be an excellent electrocat-
2
4−
of the PW11O39Fe(III) (H O)
anion. In all experiments, double
alyst for H O reduction to hydroxyl radicals[1]. Herein it was used
2
2 2
distilled water was used.
to constitute a novel EFL system that was directly applied to DMP
degradation under neutral pH conditions. The results are shown in
Fig. 2A.
2.2. DMP degradation and electrochemical impedance
spectroscopy (EIS)
As can be seen from Fig. 2A, without application of a cathodic
potential, the DMP concentration remained nearly unchanged in
DMP degradation experiments were performed using an elec-
trochemical workstation (CHI, Shanghai, China) under a controlled
potential using a conventional three-compartment cell (volume
solution containing 0.1 mM DMP and 1.0 mM PW11Fe(III)(H O)
2
under ambient conditions (curve a). Once a cathodic potential of
−0.5 V was applied, a slow decrease in DMP concentration was
observed (curve b) and reached ∼78% degradation after a reaction
time of 120 min. This result indicates that application of a cathodic
potential is necessary for DMP degradation because it causes reduc-
4
0 mL). The working electrode was a graphite rod with a diameter
2
of 6 mm and a surface area of ca. 2.5 cm , and the counter electrode
was a platinum flake placed in the anodic compartment. The anodic
compartment was separated from the cathodic compartment by a
porous glass frit. The reference electrode was Ag/AgCl (3 M KCl). The
cathodic compartment had a volume of 20 mL and was equipped
with a magnetic stirrer.
tion of O2 in solution to H O2 in situ at the graphite electrode and
2
reduction of Fe(III) to Fe(II), which further catalyzes H O reduc-
2
2
•
tion to HO that destroys DMP. The slow degradation rate is due
to insufficient O2 under ambient conditions, which resulted in a
−
1
Before electrolysis, the solution containing 1.0 mM
slow H O2 generation. When an O2 flow of 60 mL min was fed to
2
PW11Fe(III)(H O) and different initial DMP concentrations was
added to the electrochemical cell in a single batch. Pure O2 (99.9%)
was blown through the solution in the cathodic compartment. The
the solution at the same potential, the decrease in DMP concentra-
tion immediately accelerated and complete DMP degradation was
obtained after 80 min (curve c and inset). We believe that this is the
2
O flow rate was controlled by a valve with scale. After the solution
2
result of a faster H O2 generation.
2
was saturated with O , electrolysis was started. During reactions,
To confirm the generation of H O2 via O2 reduction at the
2
2
1
00-L samples were withdrawn at different time intervals and
graphite cathode, the cumulative H O2 concentration in the pH
2
diluted to 500 L for HPLC analysis. For TOC analysis, a 5-mL
6.86 phosphate buffer solution was monitored. Fig. 2B shows the
sample was withdrawn at the end of the electrolysis.
experimental results. It can be seen that the H O2 concentration
2
In order to prove the existence of H O generated in situ at elec-
trode during reaction, a series of experiments were performed in
increased with the reaction time. Under both ambient conditions
and a more positive potential, H O was produced at a low concen-
2
2
2
2
the pH 6.86 phosphate buffer solution free of PW11Fe(III)(H O)
tration. With an increase in O2 and application of a more negative
2
in the electrochemical cell by purging oxygen (99.9%) onto the
graphite cathode by a glass frit diffuser under cathodic potentials.
A valve with scale was used to ensure the oxygen flow rate. The
solution sample of 200 L was taken and analyzed immediately to
measure the H O concentration.
potential, H O2 was generated at higher concentrations. However,
an O2 flow too fast is detrimental to oxygen adsorption onto the
2
cathode and is thus unfavorable for H O2 generation [17].
2
Because the cathodic potential and O2 flow rate directly influ-
ence the rate of H O generating at the graphite electrode, and thus
2
2
2
2
Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements
were conducted using the same electrochemical workstation and
a one-compartment cell with glassy carbon (GC) as the working
the DMP degradation rate, the optimal cathodic potential and O2
flow rate values were investigated. The results are shown in Fig. 3.
We can see from Fig. 3A that a more negative cathodic potential
2
electrode (0.07 cm ), a platinum wire as the counter electrode, and
accelerated the rate of DMP degradation by facilitating H O gener-
2 2
Ag/AgCl (3 M KCl) as the reference electrode. Prior to use, the GC
ation. However, when the potential was more negative than −0.5 V,