A.A. Soares-Paulino et al.
Dyes and Pigments 179 (2020) 108355
complexes with some biomolecules like DNA, RNA, proteins and amino
acids leading to disturbs in a variety of cell processes [26]. One of the
most used analytical techniques to detect and quantify the presence of
palladium in a sample is the inductively coupled plasma mass spec-
trometry (ICP-MS). Although it is a highly sensitive and selective
method, this technique presents a high financial cost, requires well
trained people to operate the equipment and presents complex sample
preparation processes [31]. Alternatively, methods using fluorescent
probes have been extensively explored in recent years [32]. They are
usually based on the catalytic action of palladium cleaving the C–O bond
in allyl and propargyl ethers, where occasionally the addition of addi-
tives like PPh3 and reducing agents is required [33,34]. Other recently
explored methods use coordination compounds where a Pd-complex is
formed through binders containing amines and sulfides [32,35].
In the present study, a selected selenide and the rhodamine moieties
were conjugated to synthesize a new naked-eye fluorescent probe for the
fast detection of palladium with high selectivity and sensitivity. The
molecular probe acts by complexation with palladium by opening of the
spirolactam ring of rhodamine unit, exhibiting an orange fluorescence
answer in good global yield. The Rh–Se probe was fully characterized by
HRMS, 1H NMR, 13C NMR, 77Se NMR, IR, UV–vis, fluorescence and X-
ray diffraction. Additionally, theoretical investigations were conducted
elucidating the mechanism of interaction of the selenide with the metal
ion.
solved by direct methods using SHELXS [38]. Subsequent
Fourier-difference map analyses yielded the positions of the
non-hydrogen atoms. Refinements were carried out with the SHELXL
package [38]. All refinements were made by full-matrix least-squares on
F2 with anisotropic displacement parameters for all non–hydrogen
atoms. Hydrogen atoms were included in the refinement in calculated
positions but the atoms (hydrogen) that are commenting performing
special bond were located in the Fourier map. Drawings were done using
ORTEP-3 for Windows [39]. The pH measurements were recorded on a
Digimed DM-20. The equipment presented the same values of pH, in a
range of 2–12, in an organic/aqueous medium (EtOH/H2O 1:1) when
compared to a purely aquous medium through the addition of HCl e
NaOH.
2.3. Spectrophotometric and spectrofluorimetric measurements
Ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis) spectra were recorded on an Agilent
Technologies Cary 60 spectrophotometer, with a quartz cuvette (path
length, 1 cm). The fluorescence spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu
RF-5301PC spectrofluorimeter (slit widths at excitation and emission of
the spectrofluorimeter are 5-5). A correction for the absorbed light was
performed when necessary. The spectroscopic characterizations and ti-
trations were performed by preparing stock solutions of compound
Rh–Se in EtOH (ca. 10À 3 mol/L) in a 1 mL volumetric flask. The studied
solutions were prepared by appropriate dilution of the stock solutions in
EtOH/H2O (50:50, v/v). All the measurements were performed at 298 K.
The association constant (log K) were obtained from software HypSpec
[40]. Fluorescence quantum yields (Φ) of Rh–Se were measured using a
solution of rhodamine B in absolute ethanol as standard (Φ ¼ 0.70) [41]
and is calculated using the equation:
2. Experimental section
2.1. Chemicals and starting materials
Methyl 2-aminobenzoate, hydrochloric acid (HCl), sodium nitrite
(NaNO2), Sodium tetrafluoroborate (NaBF4), sodium acetate (AcONa),
ethane-1,2-diamine, 1-(4-bromophenyl)ethanone, potassium phenyl-
trifluoroborate, 4-methylbenzene-1-sulfonyl chloride (TsCl), 4-dimethy-
laminopyridine (DMAP), rhodamine-B were purchased from Sigma-
Aldrich. The 1,2-dimethyldiselane (Me2Se2) was prepared as reported
in the literature [36,37]. Metallic salts: Al(NO3)3⋅9H2O, Cr(NO3)3⋅9H2O,
Ga(NO3)3, Co(NO3)2⋅6H2O, Nd(NO3)3⋅6H2O, Pb(ClO4)2⋅3H2O, Ni
(ClO4)2⋅6H2O, Ca(ClO4)2⋅4H2O, Mg(ClO4)⋅6H2O, Zn(ClO4)2⋅6H2O, Cd
(ClO4)2⋅6H2O, Hg(ClO4)2⋅XH2O, Fe(ClO4)3⋅XH2O, Mn(ClO4)2⋅6H2O,
AgClO4, Fe(ClO4)2⋅XH2O, Ba(ClO4)2, LiClO4, Co(ClO4)2⋅6H2O, KCl,
CeCl3, RuCl3⋅3H2O, HAuCl4⋅3H2O, PtCl2, PdCl2, PdBr2, Pd(PhCN)2Cl2,
Pd(AcO)2, Pd(dppe)2, Pd(dba)2, [PdCl(allyl)]2, Pd-PEPPSI-SIPr,
Pd-PEPPSI-IPr, Pd(dppf)Cl2.CH2Cl2, Pd(acac)2 and Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 were
purchased from Alpha Aesar and used as received. All salts were dis-
solved in distilled water except the palladium, platinum and ruthenium
salts, which were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). CAUTION!
All compounds (intermediates, reagents and final products) were
manipulated in a fume hood and avoiding contact with skin.
À
�
R
2
Risample
sample
std
R
ФSample
¼
x
x ФStd
(1)
ðRistdÞ2
Φsample and Φstd are the radiative quantum yields of sample and the
standard respectively, Risample and Ristd are the refractive indices of the
sample and standard solutions (pure solvents were assumed respec-
R
R
tively), sample and std the respective areas of emission for sample
and standard. The sample and the standard were excited at the same
wavelength, maintaining equal absorbance. For Detection (LOD) and
quantification (LOQ) limits, ten different analyses for the selected re-
ceptor were performed in order to obtain the LOD and LOQ. The LOD
and LOQ were obtained by applying the formula:
LOD ¼ yblank þ3 std
LOQ ¼ yblank þ 10 std
(2)
(3)
Where yblank ¼ signal detection limit and std ¼ standard deviation.
2.2. Instrumentations
2.4. Computational procedures
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded on a
Bruker Avance III 200 (200 MHz, 1H; 50 MHz, 13C; 38 MHz, 77Se) and
Bruker DPX 300 (300 MHz, 1H; 75 MHz, 13C) using CDCl3 as solvent and
tetramethylsilane (0 ppm) and diphenyl diselenide (463 ppm) as scale
calibrating standards. High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were
recorded at micrOTOF-QII Bruker mass spectra (by electron spray time-
of-flight (ESI-TOF)). Other mass spectra were recorded at a Shimadzu
LCMS-8030 quadrupole mass spectrometer operating in the electrospray
ionization (ESI) mode and GC/MS-QP2010 (70 eV) Shimadzu, chro-
matography column Restek Rtx-5MS. The infra-red (IR) spectra were
recorded on a FTIR-Frontier-PerkinElmer. X-ray diffraction analysis
were collected on a Bruker D8 Venture Photon 100 diffractometer
Geometry optimizations in gas phase were done with density func-
tional M06L. SDD basis set was used for Palladium and selenium atoms
while 6-31G(d) basis set was used for the remaining ones. All the cal-
culations were performed with Gaussian09 rev. D.01 suite of quantum
chemical programs.
The X-ray structure and the geometry optimized with M06L func-
tional and basis set SDD for Pd and Se and 6-31G(d) for the remaining
atoms are compared in Fig. S32. This structure was used in subsequent
calculations after opening the spirolactam ring and adding Pd2þ be-
tween the N of this ring and the Se atom, keeping the two N of amides
deprotonated. Potential energy surface scans were done with PM6 semi
empirical method for looking for new conformations of Rh–Se plus Pd2þ
complex without Cl-anion and with Cl-anion plus H in the N atom of one
of amide groups. The energy minima structures found were used in ge-
ometry optimizations with density functional M06L with SDD basis set
equipped with an Incoatec IμS high brilliance Mo Kα X-ray tube with two
dimensional Montel micro-focusing optics at 100(2) K using an Oxford
Cryosystems Cryostream 800 low temperature unit. The structure was
2