Please do not adjust margins
Page 7 of 9
New Journal of Chemistry
Journal Name
ARTICLE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
35.8, 31.89, 31.82, 28.2, 28.0, 27.6, 24.2, 23.8, 22.8, 22.5, 21.6, efficiency of the dye via the equation as: RE = (Ci – Cf)V/Cieiw, iAnrtiwclehOicnhlinCei
21.0, 19.3, 18.7, 11.8; FTIR (KBr, cm-1): 3445, 3214, 2949, 1766, represents the initial concentration of the dye in solution; Cf is the
DOI: 10.1039/C8NJ05613G
1608, 1440, 1363, 1213, 1163; HRMS (TOF MS ES+): calcd. 717.4301 final concentration of dye in the presence of adsorbing gel.
(M+H)+, found 717.4385 (M+H)+; calcd. 739.4121 (M+Na)+, found For the gel column, gel of 1 (50 mg) was prepared in 2 mL DMSO-
739.4122 (M+Na)+.
General procedure for gelation test
H2O (1:2, v/v) in the syringe. Then aqueous solution of ER solution
(5 mL, c = 3.5 x 10-5 M) was passed through it. The removal
The required amount of compound 1 was dissolved in desired efficiency (RE) of ER from its aqueous solution (2 mL) was estimated
solvent (1 mL) by slight warming and then cooled to room according to the procedure as described above.
temperature to form a gel. For solvent mixtures, compound 1 was
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
first dissolved in a solvent and then the co-solvent was added as per
requirement. The gel was tested via the usual inversion of vial
method. The gel-to-sol transition temperature (Tgel) was measured
by dropping ball method. Sample of gel for SEM imaging was dried
under vacuum and then coated with a thin layer of gold metal.
Acknowledgements
AP thanks CSIR, New Delhi, India for a fellowship. SG thanks
University of Kalyani for providing University Research
Fellowship. KG thanks SERB, DST, New Delhi, for financial
support (File No. EMR/2016/008005/OC). We also
acknowledge DST, Govt. of India for financial assistance in
PURSE-II program.
General procedures for UV-vis titrations
Stock solution of the compound 1 (c = 2.50 × 10−5 M) was prepared
in DMSO-H2O (1:1 v/v). Stock solutions of anions (c = 1.0 × 10−3 M)
were prepared in DMSO. Then 2 mL solution of the compound was
taken in the cuvette and different amounts of various anions were
sequentially added to it. Upon addition of anions, change in
absorbance of the compound was recorded.
References
1
(a) M. Liu, G. Ouyang, D. Niua and Y. Sang, Org. Chem. Front.
2018, 5, 2885; b) C. D. Jones and J. W. Steed, Chem. Soc. Rev.
2016, 45, 6546; (c) D. B. Amabilino, D. K. Smith and J. W.
Steed, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 2404; (d) E. R. Draper, D. J.
Adams, Chem 2017, 3, 390: (e) M. J. Webber and R. Langer,
Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 6600; (f) H. Svobodova, V.
Noponen, E. Kolehmainen and E. Sievanen, RSC Adv. 2012, 2,
4985; (g) H. M. T. Albuquerque, C. M. M. Santos and A. M. S.
Silva, Molecules, 2019, 24, 116; (h) A. B. Matheson, V.
Koutsos, G. Dalkas, S. Euston and P. Clegg, Langmuir, 2017,
33, 4537.
Binding constant determination12
Benesi-Hildebrand plot was adopted to determine the binding
-
constant value using the expression: A0/(A-A0) = [εM /(εM – εC)](Ka
1Cg-1 +1), where εM and εC represent molar extinction coefficients for
the compound 1 and the complex, respectively, at a selected
wavelength, A0 denotes the absorbance of free compound 1 at that
specific wavelength and Cg is the concentration of the anion. The
measured absorbance A0/(A-A0) as a function of the inverse of the
2
3
(a) S. Datta, S. Bhattacharya, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 5596;
(b) N. M. Sangeetha and U. Maitra, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2005, 34,
821; (c) X. Yu, L. Chen, M. Zhang and T. Yi, Chem. Soc. Rev.
2014, 43, 5346; (d) X. Sui, X. Feng, M. A. Hempenius and G. J.
Vancso, J. Mater. Chem. B 2013, 1, 1658; (e) S. S. Babu, V. K.
Praveen and A. Ajayaghosh, Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 1973.
(a) M. D. Segarra-Maset, V.J. Nebot, J. F. Miravet and B.
Escuder, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 7086; (b) X. Yang, G.
Zhang and D. Zhang, J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 38; (c) M. O.
M. Piepenbrock, G. O. Lloyd, N. Clarke and J. W. Steed, Chem.
Rev. 2010, 110, 1960; (d) G. Yu, K. Jie and F. Huang, Chem.
Rev. 2015, 115, 7240; (e) A. Y. –Y. Tam, V. W. –W. Yam,
Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 1540; (f) H. Maeda, Chem. Eur. J.
2008, 14, 11274; (g) S. Panja and D. J. Adams, Chem.
Commun. 2019, 55, 47.
(a) A. Panja and K. Ghosh, Supramol. Chem. 2018, 30, 722;
(b) K. Ghosh, S. Panja and S. Bhattacharya, ChemistrySelect
2017, 2, 959; (c) A. Panja and K. Ghosh, New. J. Chem. 2018,
42, 13718; (d) A. Panja and K. Ghosh, Mater. Chem. Front.
2018, 2, 2286; (e) K. Ghosh, A. Panja and S. Panja, New. J.
Chem. 2016, 40, 3476; (f) S. Panja, S. Bhattacharya and K.
Ghosh, Langmuir, 2017, 33, 8277; (g) S. Panja, S.
Bhattacharya and K. Ghosh, Mater. Chem. Front. 2018, 2,
385; (h) S. Panja, S. Ghosh and K. Ghosh, New J. Chem. 2018,
42, 6488; i) A. Panja and K. Ghosh, ChemistrySelect 2018, 3,
1809; (j) A. Panja and K. Ghosh, Mater. Chem. Front. 2018, 2,
1866; (k) A. Panja and K. Ghosh, ChemistrySelect 2018, 3,
9448.
anion concentration fits
a linear relationship, indicating 1:1
stoichiometry of the compound 1-anion complex. The ratio of the
intercept to slope was used to determine the binding constant Ka.
Calculation of detection limit13
Detection limit was calculated by using the UV-vis titration data.
The absorbance of 1 was measured 5 times, and the standard
deviation of blank measurement was achieved. To have the slope,
absorbance values were plotted against the concentrations of
anion. The detection limits were calculated using the equation:
Detection limit = 3σ/k, where σ is the standard deviation of blank
measurement, and k is the slope.
4
Dye adsorption experiment4f
For this experiment, gel of 1 [25 mg/ml] was prepared in DMSO-H2O
(1:1 v/v). Dye solutions were prepared in the concentration of c =
3.5 x 10-5 M in pure water. Then an amount of 3 ml of different dye
solutions was separately added to the gel. Adsorption of dyes was
monitored by UV-vis spectroscopy. The dye adosrption efficiency of
the gel was determined by comparing the absorption spectral
changes of respective dye solutions, recorded before and after the
experiment. The final concentration of the dye in solution was
calculated according to the Beer-Lambert law (A = cl, A is the
absorbance of the dye at a certain absorption wavelength in
solution, is the molar extinction coefficient and l is the path length
of the incident light) which ultimately determined the removal
5
(a) K. Ghosh, A. R. Sarkar, T. Sarkar, S. Panja and D. Kar, RSC
Adv. 2014, 4, 20114; (b) K. Ghosh and S. Panja,
ChemistrySelect 2016, 1, 3667; (c) K. Ghosh and S. Panja, RSC.
Adv. 2015, 5, 12094; (d) P. Rajamalli and E. Prasad, Org. Lett.
2011, 13, 3714; (f) T. Ono, S. Amemori, H. Komatsu, S.
Shinkai and K. Sada, Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 1571; (g) H.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 7
Please do not adjust margins