THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY VOL. 285, NO. 27, pp. 20756–20768, July 2, 2010
© 2010 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. Printed in the U.S.A.
Glutamates 78 and 122 in the Active Site of Saccharopine
Dehydrogenase Contribute to Reactant Binding and
Modulate the Basicity of the Acid-Base Catalysts*
Received for publication, March 3, 2010, and in revised form, April 27, 2010 Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 28, 2010, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M110.119826
Devi K. Ekanayake, Babak Andi, Kostyantyn D. Bobyk, Ann H. West, and Paul F. Cook1
From the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019
Saccharopine dehydrogenase catalyzes the NAD-dependent
oxidative deamination of saccharopine to give L-lysine and
␣-ketoglutarate. There are a number of conserved hydrophilic,
ionizable residues in the active site, all of which must be impor-
tant to the overall reaction. In an attempt to determine the con-
tribution to binding and rate enhancement of each of the resi-
dues in the active site, mutations at each residue are being made,
and double mutants are being made to estimate the interrela-
tionship between residues. Here, we report the effects of muta-
tions of active site glutamate residues, Glu78 and Glu122, on
reactant binding and catalysis. Site-directed mutagenesis was
used to generate E78Q, E122Q, E78Q/E122Q, E78A, E122A, and
E78A/E122A mutant enzymes. Mutation of these residues
increases the positive charge of the active site and is expected to
affect the pKa values of the catalytic groups. Each mutant
enzyme was completely characterized with respect to its kinetic
and chemical mechanism. The kinetic mechanism remains the
same as that of wild type enzymes for all of the mutant enzymes,
with the exception of E78A, which exhibits binding of ␣-ketogl-
utarate to E and E⅐NADH. Large changes in V/KLys, but not V,
suggest that Glu78 and Glu122 contribute binding energy for
lysine. Shifts of more than a pH unit to higher and lower pH of
the pKa values observed in the V/KLys pH-rate profile of the
mutant enzymes suggests that the presence of Glu78 and Glu122
modulates the basicity of the catalytic groups.
lyzes the final step of the ␣-aminoadipate pathway, the revers-
ible pyridine nucleotide-dependent oxidative deamination of
saccharopine using NAD as the oxidizing agent, to produce
␣-ketoglutarate (␣-Kg) and lysine (Scheme 1) (2). SDH from
Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a monomer with a molecular mass
of 41 kDa, with one active site (8).
On the basis of the pH dependence of the kinetic parame-
ters (9), dissociation constants for the competitive inhibitors
(1), and isotope effects (9), a chemical mechanism has been
proposed for SDH (1, 10). In the direction of saccharopine
oxidation, once NAD and saccharopine are bound, a group
with a pKa of 6.2 accepts a proton from the secondary amine
of saccharopine as it is oxidized. The imine of saccharopine
is hydrolyzed via general base-catalyzed activation of a water
molecule, via the intermediacy of carbinolamine intermedi-
ates. The base participating in the hydrolysis reaction has a
pKa of 7.2. Finally, the ⑀-amine of lysine is protonated by the
conjugate acid of the base with a pKa of 6.2, and products are
released (1, 9, 10). Isotope effects suggest that hydride trans-
fer and hydrolysis of the imine contribute to rate limitation
(9).
Structures of SDH have been solved in the apoenzyme
form (11) and with either AMP or oxalylglycine (OG), ana-
logues of NAD and ␣-Kg, bound (10). A semiempirical struc-
ture of the E⅐NAD⅐saccharopine ternary complex was gener-
ated on the basis of E⅐AMP and E⅐OG structures (Fig. 1) (10).
Given the semiempirical nature of the model, the relative
The ␣-aminoadipate pathway for lysine biosynthesis is positions of reactants and active site groups are estimates,
unique to fungi and euglenoids (1–3). Lysine is an essential and the overall model represents an open form of the
amino acid for most organisms. Human pathogenic fungi, enzyme, e.g. the distance for hydride transfer from the C␣
including Candida albicans, Aspergillus fumigatus, and Cryp- proton of the glutamyl moiety to the 4 position of the nico-
tococcus neoformans and the plant pathogen Magnaporthe tinamide ring is 4.7 Å, much too long for hydride transfer.
grisea, use this pathway for lysine biosynthesis (4–6). Knocking There are a number of ionizable residues in the active site,
out the LYS1 gene is lethal to the fungal cells, suggesting that and a multiple sequence alignment of the SDH from C. albi-
selective inhibition of one or more enzymes may help to control cans, Pichia guilliermondii, S. cerevisiae, A. fumigatus, and
or completely eradicate these pathogens in vivo (5, 7).
C. neoformans indicated that all are conserved in all five
Saccharopine dehydrogenase (SDH)2 (N6-(glutaryl-2)-L-ly- organisms, consistent with their importance in the mecha-
sine:NAD oxidoreductase (L-lysine forming) (EC 1.5.1.7)) cata- nism. In the ternary complex, Arg131 and Arg18 are likely
ion-paired to two of the carboxylates of saccharopine. In
addition, however, there are three lysine residues, Lys99 in
* Thisworkwassupported, inwholeorinpart, byNationalInstitutesofHealth
Grant GM 071417 (to P. F. C. and A. H. W.). This work was also supported by
the vicinity of the ␣-carboxylate of saccharopine, Lys77 in the
vicinity of the secondary amine of saccharopine, and Lys13
the Grayce B. Kerr Endowment to the University of Oklahoma (for P. F. C.).
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Chemistry and
Biochemistry, University of Oklahoma, 620 Parrington Oval, Norman, OK
73019. Fax: 405-325-7182; E-mail: pcook@ou.edu.
2 The abbreviations used are: SDH, saccharopine dehydrogenase; ␣-Kg, ␣-ke-
toglutarate; OG, oxalylglycine; WT, wild type; D2O, deuterium oxide; Ni-
NTA, nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid; Ches, 2-(cyclohexylamino)ethanesulfonic
acid; Mes, 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid; Taps, 3-[tris(hydroxy-
methyl)methyl]aminopropanesulfonic acid; NADD, reduced nicotinamide
adenine dinucleotide with deuterium in the 4R position.
20756 JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
VOLUME 285•NUMBER 27•JULY 2, 2010