Enantioselective Carbonyl-Ene Reactions of Arylglyoxals
FULL PAPERS
hydrate and 0.25 mmol of the alkene. The resulting mixture References
was stirred for required time at room temperature. The re-
action mixture was firstly concentrated and then diluted
with 1 mL of hexane. The mixture was immediately loaded
onto a silica gel column, and eluted with hexane/ethyl ace-
tate mixture to give the corresponding product. The isolated
compound was characterized with 1H NMR and 13C NMR
(CDCl3, 400 MHz). The enantiomeric excess was deter-
mined by HPLC with a chiral column.
[1] For a catalyst based on Al, see: K. Maruoka, Y. Hoshi-
no, T. Shirasaka, H. Yamamoto, Tetrahedron Lett. 1988,
29, 3967–3970.
[2] For catalysts based on Ti, see: a) K. Mikami, M.
Terada, T. Nakai, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 1940–
1941; b) K. Mikami, M. Terada, T. Nakai, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1990, 112, 3949–3954; c) K. Mikami, Pure Appl.
Chem. 1996, 68, 639–644; d) Y. M. A. Yamada, M. Ichi-
nohe, H. Takahashi, S. Ikegami, Tetrahedron Lett. 2002,
43, 3431–3434; e) Y. Yuan, X. Zhang, K. Ding, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5478–5480; f) H. Guo, X.
Wang, K. Ding, Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 2009–2012.
[3] For catalysts based on Ln, see: a) C. Qian, T. Huang,
Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 6721–6724; b) C. Qian, L.
Wang, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2000, 11, 2347–2357.
[4] For catalysts based on Cu, see: a) D. A. Evans, C. S.
Burgey, N. A. Paras, T. Vojkovsky, S. W. Tregay, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5824–5825; b) D. A. Evans, S. W.
Tregay, C. S. Burgey, N. A. Paras, T. Vojkovsky, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7936–7943.
General Procedure for Catalyst Recycle in Ionic
Liquid
The in situ activated catalyst solution in dichloromethane
was transferred through a small filter into another small
Schlenk flask which was already charged with 0.5 mL or
1 mL of ionic liquid. Then 0.25 mmol of phenylglyoxal mon-
ohydrate was added and the resulting mixture was stirred
for several minutes until the phenylglyoxal monohydrate
had dissolved completely. After removing the dichlorome-
thane under vacuum, 0.25 mmol of alkene was added and
the reaction was run for the required time at room tempera-
ture. Then the reaction mixture was extracted with ether
(2 mL3). Removal of the ether gave a residue which was
[5] For a catalyst based on Co, see: S. Kezuka, T. Ikeno, T.
Yamada, Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1937–1939.
then dissolved into 1.5 mL of hexane/ethyl acetate(9:1),
G
[6] For catalysts based on Pd and Pt, see: a) J. Hao, M.
Hatano, K. Mikami, Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 4059–4062;
b) K. Mikami, K. Aikawa, Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 99–101;
c) J. H. Koh, A. O. Larsen, M. R. GagnØ, Org. Lett.
2001, 3, 1233–1236; d) J. J. Becker, P. S. White, M. R.
GagnØ, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9478–9479; e) H.-
K. Luo, H. Schumann, J. Mol. Cat. A: Chem. 2006, 248,
42–47; f) S. Doherty, P. Goodrich, C. Hardacre, H.-K.
Luo, M. Nieuwenhuyzen, R. K. Rath, Organometallics
2005, 24, 5945–5955.
loaded onto a silica gel column, and eluted with hexane/
ethyl acetate mixture (9:1) to give the corresponding prod-
uct. The isolated material was checked with 1H NMR
(CDCl3, 400 MHz). The enantiomeric excess was deter-
mined by HPLC with a chiral column. After being extract-
ed, the reaction mixture (i.e., ionic liquid layer) was dried
under vacuum to remove the residual ether. According to
the above procedure, the reaction was repeated for 21 times
to evaluate the capabilities of the ionic liquid immobilized
chiral catalyst.
[7] For a catalyst based on Sc, see: D. A. Evans, J. Wu, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 8006–8007.
[8] a) R. A. Brown, P. Pollet, E. McKoon, C. A. Eckert,
C. L. Liotta, P. G. Jessop, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,
1254–1255; b) C. E. Song, E. J. Roh, Chem. Commun.
2000, 837–838; c) I. Kawasaki, K. Tsunoda, T. Tsuji, T.
Yamaguchi, H. Shibuta, N. Uchida, M. Yamashita, S.
Ohta, Chem. Commun. 2005, 2134–2136.
SupportingInformation
Detailed descriptions of the procedures for the preparation
and characterization of products 1a–g, 2a–g, 3a–g, 4a–g, 5a–
g, 6a–g, 7a–g, 8a–g, 9a–e and 10a–e are given in the Support-
ing Information.
[9] R. Bousset, Bull. Soc. Chim. 1939, 6, 986–988.
[10] H.-K. Luo, H.-Y Yang, X. J. Tan, S. C. Ong, H. Schu-
mann, B. K. Lim, C. Lim, J. Mol. Cat. A: Chem. 2007,
261, 112–119.
[11] a) M.-C. Tseng, Y.-M. Liang and Y.-H. Chu, Tetrahe-
dron Lett. 2005, 46, 6131–6136; b) L. Cammarata, S. G.
Kazarian, P. A. Salter, T. Welton, Phys. Chem. Chem.
Phys. 2001, 3, 5192–5200.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Institute of Chemical and Engi-
neering Sciences (ICES) A-STAR, Singapore.
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 1781 – 1795
ꢀ 2007 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
1795